Shock tower failure on 718 Spyder
#76
There have been GT3 Strut tower failures and the it’s my understanding the GT3 uses the same strut tower part as the GT4 etc.
Given the seeming randomness of this issue, it would seem it could be the coilovers themselves that are the offending part. They are active, compressing and expanding so if there was some variable causing this issue the probability would favor a “moving” part over a fixed part such as the strut tower itself. Also given the adjustability of these coilovers for camber etc., there might be certain setting that expose greater risk of failure. The strut tower itself should have been reinforced to provide a greater margin of error but barring a material defect in the aluminum it seems the more likely culprit is the coilover.
Good to hear it was a rear apparent “stress” failure. I hope the front strut tower failure is a thing of the past. Interesting, looks like that car with the failure was running PCCBs
Given the seeming randomness of this issue, it would seem it could be the coilovers themselves that are the offending part. They are active, compressing and expanding so if there was some variable causing this issue the probability would favor a “moving” part over a fixed part such as the strut tower itself. Also given the adjustability of these coilovers for camber etc., there might be certain setting that expose greater risk of failure. The strut tower itself should have been reinforced to provide a greater margin of error but barring a material defect in the aluminum it seems the more likely culprit is the coilover.
Good to hear it was a rear apparent “stress” failure. I hope the front strut tower failure is a thing of the past. Interesting, looks like that car with the failure was running PCCBs
Last edited by Underblu; 07-23-2020 at 02:56 AM.
#77
Burning Brakes
#78
There have been GT3 Strut tower failures and the it’s my understanding the GT3 uses the same strut tower part as the GT4 etc.
Given the seeming randomness of this issue, it would seem it could be the coilovers themselves that are the offending part. They are active, compressing and expanding so if there was some variable causing this issue the probability would favor a “moving” part over a fixed part such as the strut tower itself. Also given the adjustability of these coilovers for camber etc., there might be certain setting that expose greater risk of failure. The strut tower itself should have been reinforced to provide a greater margin of error but baring a material defect in the aluminum it seems the more likely culprit is the coilover.
Good to hear it was a rear apparent “stress” failure. I hope the front strut tower failure is a thing of the past. Interesting, looks like that car with the failure was running PCCBs
Given the seeming randomness of this issue, it would seem it could be the coilovers themselves that are the offending part. They are active, compressing and expanding so if there was some variable causing this issue the probability would favor a “moving” part over a fixed part such as the strut tower itself. Also given the adjustability of these coilovers for camber etc., there might be certain setting that expose greater risk of failure. The strut tower itself should have been reinforced to provide a greater margin of error but baring a material defect in the aluminum it seems the more likely culprit is the coilover.
Good to hear it was a rear apparent “stress” failure. I hope the front strut tower failure is a thing of the past. Interesting, looks like that car with the failure was running PCCBs
I want to believe Porsche did pay attention to this issue and strengthened the 718 top mounts a bit more.
#79
That's the top hat, not the strut tower. No biggy, cheap to fix/replace and nothing to do with the structure...Mazda 3's were known for doing this all the time on their rear struts too. Aftermarket can even deal with this if it becomes a regular problem.
I'd call this a non-issue.
I'd call this a non-issue.
The following users liked this post:
Underblu (07-23-2020)
#80
That looks like a tension failure. It looks like the top of the shock tore when the suspension was unloaded. Maybe they were doing a Dukes of Hazard jump. Even so, it would be really bizarre for it to tear just under the force of gravity (weight of the suspension hanging down), but it sure looks like a tension failure. The shock tower looks ok. And a rear failure would we far easier to fix since there is nothing else really going on back there. Quite strange.
#82
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,309
Received 618 Likes
on
422 Posts
This. This was not a common problem on the 981 and every instance was due to hitting something. Shame it's not more durable, but it's not a design or manufacturing defect. Don't hit stuff.
That said, I cringe every time I watch a 718 track video where the driver is just pummeling the car over the curbing.
That said, I cringe every time I watch a 718 track video where the driver is just pummeling the car over the curbing.
https://rennlist.com/forums/gt4/9483...r-failure.html
#83
Let's be careful here, EVERY instance was due to hitting something is not 100% accurate. If you take the time to read the GT4 forum thread you'll learn a lot about this failure mode.
https://rennlist.com/forums/gt4/9483...r-failure.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/gt4/9483...r-failure.html
The following users liked this post:
elevensheep (12-23-2020)
#84
Rennlist Member
#85
Guys - he reports that there was an accident on the highway - the real damage is a twisted frame in the rear rendering the car a write off. Seems like a torn strut was a byproduct of the accident. This is certainly different from the 981 failures.
The following users liked this post:
Croc999 (07-26-2020)
#86
If you look at the picture carefully, you will see the base of the top hat is wavy meaning there must of been something to cause this to happen. This is probably the initial source of the problem. The fact that the top part ripped probably happened afterwards (maybe a few days later) from the initial damage. When the top hat is bolted to the chassis, it should sit flush/flat with 3 bolts. So if it is wavy, the chassis would be wavy too? If the bolts were loose, I am sure driver would have heard some noise from the rear, it would be like a thumping noise as the suspension is doing it’s job. I think everyone is looking for answers....
One thing to consider is this is the first time they put inverted dampers with helper springs (full Motorsport setup) in a boxster chassis. Maybe the chassis needs extra reinforcement to handle the more aggressive damper settings. You noticed the weight of the spyder is same as cayman, normally open top cars need extra reinforcement and weigh more than close top counterpart. Just something to consider....
#87
You must be kidding right? The chassis needs extra support for more aggressive damper settings?
The Cayman was developed from the Boxster not the other way around. The “Boxster” has one of the most rigid chassis of any open top car. If it was an open top issue it should’ve happened to the Speedster first. You know that other chopped top Porsche GT car that was developed from the coupe.
Ferrari doesn’t seem to have issue with their Speciale Aperta or Pista Spyder suspension imploding for “no reason” So to suggest it is an open top issue is beyond absurd.
For that level of damage, some major impact had to occur. Otherwise, Porsche has a major quality control issue, but this would have nothing to do with open top vs hard top.
The Cayman was developed from the Boxster not the other way around. The “Boxster” has one of the most rigid chassis of any open top car. If it was an open top issue it should’ve happened to the Speedster first. You know that other chopped top Porsche GT car that was developed from the coupe.
Ferrari doesn’t seem to have issue with their Speciale Aperta or Pista Spyder suspension imploding for “no reason” So to suggest it is an open top issue is beyond absurd.
For that level of damage, some major impact had to occur. Otherwise, Porsche has a major quality control issue, but this would have nothing to do with open top vs hard top.
I read all the comments and pictures on FB before I saw this thread. The car is a write off because there is a 1.4cm bend in the frame, it would cost more than 70000 EUR to fix it, new chassis is needed. Looks like car is taken apart by either insurance company and/or Porsche to find out what happened but the owner is trying to get more information. The owner mentioned “accident” on the highway in 4th gear but there looks to be no physical damage to the exterior of the car. The way I interpreted the comments is that it was not an accident but the incident happened on the highway (I.e. maybe a loud noise, car felt off, etc). He did not hit any bumps and said it is not his fault. When they took car apart, the found the rear shock in the picture and the frame damage and determined car is not worth fixing.
If you look at the picture carefully, you will see the base of the top hat is wavy meaning there must of been something to cause this to happen. This is probably the initial source of the problem. The fact that the top part ripped probably happened afterwards (maybe a few days later) from the initial damage. When the top hat is bolted to the chassis, it should sit flush/flat with 3 bolts. So if it is wavy, the chassis would be wavy too? If the bolts were loose, I am sure driver would have heard some noise from the rear, it would be like a thumping noise as the suspension is doing it’s job. I think everyone is looking for answers....
One thing to consider is this is the first time they put inverted dampers with helper springs (full Motorsport setup) in a boxster chassis. Maybe the chassis needs extra reinforcement to handle the more aggressive damper settings. You noticed the weight of the spyder is same as cayman, normally open top cars need extra reinforcement and weigh more than close top counterpart. Just something to consider....
If you look at the picture carefully, you will see the base of the top hat is wavy meaning there must of been something to cause this to happen. This is probably the initial source of the problem. The fact that the top part ripped probably happened afterwards (maybe a few days later) from the initial damage. When the top hat is bolted to the chassis, it should sit flush/flat with 3 bolts. So if it is wavy, the chassis would be wavy too? If the bolts were loose, I am sure driver would have heard some noise from the rear, it would be like a thumping noise as the suspension is doing it’s job. I think everyone is looking for answers....
One thing to consider is this is the first time they put inverted dampers with helper springs (full Motorsport setup) in a boxster chassis. Maybe the chassis needs extra reinforcement to handle the more aggressive damper settings. You noticed the weight of the spyder is same as cayman, normally open top cars need extra reinforcement and weigh more than close top counterpart. Just something to consider....
#88
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,534
Received 833 Likes
on
458 Posts
You must be kidding right? The chassis needs extra support for more aggressive damper settings?
The Cayman was developed from the Boxster not the other way around. The “Boxster” has one of the most rigid chassis of any open top car. If it was an open top issue it should’ve happened to the Speedster first. You know that other chopped top Porsche GT car that was developed from the coupe.
Ferrari doesn’t seem to have issue with their Speciale Aperta or Pista Spyder suspension imploding for “no reason” So to suggest it is an open top issue is beyond absurd.
For that level of damage, some major impact had to occur. Otherwise, Porsche has a major quality control issue, but this would have nothing to do with open top vs hard top.
The Cayman was developed from the Boxster not the other way around. The “Boxster” has one of the most rigid chassis of any open top car. If it was an open top issue it should’ve happened to the Speedster first. You know that other chopped top Porsche GT car that was developed from the coupe.
Ferrari doesn’t seem to have issue with their Speciale Aperta or Pista Spyder suspension imploding for “no reason” So to suggest it is an open top issue is beyond absurd.
For that level of damage, some major impact had to occur. Otherwise, Porsche has a major quality control issue, but this would have nothing to do with open top vs hard top.
Was the wheel damaged?
The following users liked this post:
Underblu (07-23-2020)
#89
You must be kidding right? The chassis needs extra support for more aggressive damper settings?
The Cayman was developed from the Boxster not the other way around. The “Boxster” has one of the most rigid chassis of any open top car. If it was an open top issue it should’ve happened to the Speedster first. You know that other chopped top Porsche GT car that was developed from the coupe.
Ferrari doesn’t seem to have issue with their Speciale Aperta or Pista Spyder suspension imploding for “no reason” So to suggest it is an open top issue is beyond absurd.
For that level of damage, some major impact had to occur. Otherwise, Porsche has a major quality control issue, but this would have nothing to do with open top vs hard top.
The Cayman was developed from the Boxster not the other way around. The “Boxster” has one of the most rigid chassis of any open top car. If it was an open top issue it should’ve happened to the Speedster first. You know that other chopped top Porsche GT car that was developed from the coupe.
Ferrari doesn’t seem to have issue with their Speciale Aperta or Pista Spyder suspension imploding for “no reason” So to suggest it is an open top issue is beyond absurd.
For that level of damage, some major impact had to occur. Otherwise, Porsche has a major quality control issue, but this would have nothing to do with open top vs hard top.
I know ~20 years ago, my friend had a 911 cab and it would squeak when the car went over the driveway, we both commented how it was a coupe chassis which had the roof chopped off so even with reinforcement, it was not perfect.
I know a properly designed open top chassis should not have any of these concerns. My last car was very stiff and I ran Penske racing shocks with 900/800 pound springs with no problems.
The following users liked this post:
Underblu (07-23-2020)
#90
Frame bend just driving down the highway. Didn’t hit anything. Rigggggghhttttttt.....