LN Engineering Ceramic IMS Bearing Failure at 30k miles
#16
So, could the rear end accident have caused or contributed to the bearing failure or the fact that they "removed and reinstalled" his engine to repair the collision damage? Or, does Jake want to share what causes the bearing wear and why the qualification process will change for future retrofits?
Last edited by sds911; 04-20-2015 at 02:28 AM.
#17
Former Vendor
The IMS housing bore is sometimes not centered other times the crankshaft is not centered. Both of these create a condition that is less than favorable for the IMS bearing.
I noted certain constants when disassembling bearings that lead to the current developments.
This is why some engines see multiple bearing failures; because the engine it's self is a leading contributor.
I noted certain constants when disassembling bearings that lead to the current developments.
This is why some engines see multiple bearing failures; because the engine it's self is a leading contributor.
#18
Rennlist Member
As with any reported failure, I am sorry to see that one of kits possibly was at fault, but being there was already a thread going on 986 Forum regarding this failure, I figured it was important to reference that thread and make a few clarifications.
http://986forum.com/forums/general-d...g-failure.html
The engine builder in question was banned from Rennlist and his motivations are questionable, as he's trying to use this failure to get his roller bearing kit into wholesale distribution by discrediting the work Jake and I have done. At no point was LN Engineering contacted to even discuss this - this went straight to the forums, again past posts by "Porsche-Land" again and again have been self-serving.
We do not have all the information here to truthfully understand what happened.
As with any mechanical system or component of that system, there will be failures, it's a matter of reducing the liklihood of said failure. Well knowing that the M96 engine has dozens of modes of failure which can cause foreign object debris that can in turn damage the rest of the engine, including the IMS Retrofit bearing, with a reported 30k miles on the bearing, it's likely there are external factors contributing to the excessive thrust loading indicated in the photos of our bearing.
Again, as I have posted on other threads and as is posted on our website, there have been legit LN bearing failures which are far and few between- these occur almost immediately and we can substantiate that it's likely the bearing itself due to jobs being properly qualified and the health of the engine verified and determined as suitable for retrofitting. Warranty or not, if the procedure is carried out properly, we stand behind our product and will usually help out in some way to lessen the pain, even beyond the part warranty, again, if the job was carried out properly and if there is even the slightest chance that indeed it was our bearing.
http://986forum.com/forums/general-d...g-failure.html
The engine builder in question was banned from Rennlist and his motivations are questionable, as he's trying to use this failure to get his roller bearing kit into wholesale distribution by discrediting the work Jake and I have done. At no point was LN Engineering contacted to even discuss this - this went straight to the forums, again past posts by "Porsche-Land" again and again have been self-serving.
We do not have all the information here to truthfully understand what happened.
As with any mechanical system or component of that system, there will be failures, it's a matter of reducing the liklihood of said failure. Well knowing that the M96 engine has dozens of modes of failure which can cause foreign object debris that can in turn damage the rest of the engine, including the IMS Retrofit bearing, with a reported 30k miles on the bearing, it's likely there are external factors contributing to the excessive thrust loading indicated in the photos of our bearing.
Again, as I have posted on other threads and as is posted on our website, there have been legit LN bearing failures which are far and few between- these occur almost immediately and we can substantiate that it's likely the bearing itself due to jobs being properly qualified and the health of the engine verified and determined as suitable for retrofitting. Warranty or not, if the procedure is carried out properly, we stand behind our product and will usually help out in some way to lessen the pain, even beyond the part warranty, again, if the job was carried out properly and if there is even the slightest chance that indeed it was our bearing.
The following users liked this post:
Enevs1 (06-27-2021)
#19
Drifting
The IMS housing bore is sometimes not centered other times the crankshaft is not centered. Both of these create a condition that is less than favorable for the IMS bearing.
I noted certain constants when disassembling bearings that lead to the current developments.
This is why some engines see multiple bearing failures; because the engine it's self is a leading contributor.
I noted certain constants when disassembling bearings that lead to the current developments.
This is why some engines see multiple bearing failures; because the engine it's self is a leading contributor.
#20
Definitely a tough situation for everyone involved given that other factors (i.e., a third variable) can cause a meltdown. To Jake's point, one local Porsche shop owner told me that he had an owner/car that had 3 failures.
Hope the car gets back on the road and the owner gets his money's worth on his new engine. The X51 is great.
Hope the car gets back on the road and the owner gets his money's worth on his new engine. The X51 is great.
#21
Oh boy, here we go again. 20+ pages on the topic of the month predicted. To be fair to Martin, he really can't reply since he was banned, so topic should really be centered around the failure itself and not him or roller ball bearing, at least in this thread.
#22
Ok running with that, how does this issue affect any kind of retrofit or the solution if one has those conditions present in their engine?
#23
Yes, that was my original question about whether the IMS Solution would have saved this motor?
And, are you guys (Chuck/Jake) developing a tool or measuring device to tell if the bore or crankshaft are centered or within spec?
And, are you guys (Chuck/Jake) developing a tool or measuring device to tell if the bore or crankshaft are centered or within spec?
#25
So is a ceramic bearing more or less susceptible to failure that a standard bearing is the bore is misaligned?, is one more tolerant than the other?
General question on bearings to any engineering experts.
I dont wish to be flamed, but I wonder how many actual failures are due to misalignment in which case replacing the bearing with a ceramic of any makebrand/seller makes no difference.
General question on bearings to any engineering experts.
I dont wish to be flamed, but I wonder how many actual failures are due to misalignment in which case replacing the bearing with a ceramic of any makebrand/seller makes no difference.
#26
Former Vendor
And, are you guys (Chuck/Jake) developing a tool or measuring device to tell if the bore or crankshaft are centered or within spec?
There are several planes to be concerned with in regard to alignment and the tool I have developed takes all of these into consideration.
#27
Porsche discovered the bore misalignment for RMS a long time ago (~9yrs) and they came up with the go no-go tool where a tech will use to decide whether to replace the RMS or the engine (under warranty). Those engines with misalignment will have the RMS failed repeatedly.
So it's quite easy to imagine the same kind of misalignment can happen to IMS as well.
So it's quite easy to imagine the same kind of misalignment can happen to IMS as well.
#30
Former Vendor