Notices
Taycan 2019-Current The Electric Porsche
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tesla existential threat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2019, 01:27 PM
  #1666  
westwest888
Instructor
 
westwest888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 140
Received 54 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Centx
I love the Model S/X screen setup, the 3 not so much. I don’t like the 3 not having an instrument display and don’t like the look of the iPad stuck into the dash look, much prefer the integrated look. I also think I prefer the two screen look on the Taycan from an aesthetic perspective than the S even. Not sure why it’s any functionally worse to have two screen instead of one long vertical. They serve different functions, being separate doesn’t hurt and I think looks better. Agree I’m unlikely to get the passenger screen unless it’s cheap, doubtful, but I don’t think it’s necessarily a negative either.
I kind of feel the opposite now. Getting into a normal car feels like getting into a bathtub. I can’t see the road because the instrument cluster blocks the bottom half of the windscreen.

The risk the European automakers are taking is that (all) buyers will want a classic luxury car powered by batteries. In reality, as Tesla is showing, consumers want an integrated smartcar with lifetime upgrades — like an iPhone you keep for 15 years.
The following users liked this post:
RonF (08-25-2019)
Old 08-25-2019, 03:11 PM
  #1667  
4pipes
Rennlist Member
 
4pipes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 581
Received 29 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I agreed with everything you said until “an iPhone you keep for 15 years”. Who keeps the same smartphone for 15 years!
Old 08-26-2019, 12:07 AM
  #1668  
westwest888
Instructor
 
westwest888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 140
Received 54 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4pipes
I agreed with everything you said until “an iPhone you keep for 15 years”. Who keeps the same smartphone for 15 years!
Well, it’s more like a desktop computer. The main board for the display is a $600 Intel Celeron 1.4 ghz. In theory you could upgrade it, but it seems to be fine for a decade. Think of all of those old cash registers and airport checkin screens out there.
Old 08-28-2019, 01:16 PM
  #1669  
acoste
Burning Brakes
 
acoste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: California
Posts: 813
Received 138 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

https://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/taycan/first-drive
Old 08-28-2019, 02:16 PM
  #1670  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,329
Received 3,631 Likes on 1,777 Posts
Default

It’s impressive, no doubt, but does it feel any different in a straight line to a Tesla Model S P100D? Nope. And right there is the challenge for makers of fast EVs: for now, extreme speed on tap is a novelty, but in the future differentiating your wares has to be a priority.
good article - nothing new here - but a continuous stream of data confirming over and over a clear marketing message.
Old 08-28-2019, 03:28 PM
  #1671  
Cloudplay
Instructor
 
Cloudplay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 105
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveo4porsche
good article - nothing new here - but a continuous stream of data confirming over and over a clear marketing message.
Nothing new here? Haven't you been going on and on about the Taycan not matching the Tesla Model S or even M3P in low speed, straight line performance? Looks like 0-60mph (once or twice) might still go to the Model S, 1/4 mile will be interesting, 0-200km/h, 1/2 mile etc should go to the Taycan Turbo. Competition makes life fun.
Old 08-28-2019, 03:37 PM
  #1672  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,329
Received 3,631 Likes on 1,777 Posts
Default

I'll believe the number when I see them…if it's sub 3 seconds then woot! range is still going to be interesting.
Old 09-01-2019, 04:54 AM
  #1673  
groundhog
Race Car
 
groundhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 3,757
Received 1,015 Likes on 644 Posts
Default

A number of articles are giving a range of 310 to 320 miles
The following users liked this post:
daveo4porsche (09-01-2019)
Old 09-01-2019, 07:23 AM
  #1674  
whiz944
Burning Brakes
 
whiz944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,014
Received 416 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by groundhog
A number of articles are giving a range of 310 to 320 miles
EPA or WLTP? EPA is the more realistic of the two.
Old 09-01-2019, 08:21 AM
  #1675  
Adk46
Rennlist Member
 
Adk46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Adirondack Mountains, New York
Posts: 2,399
Received 310 Likes on 161 Posts
Default

Anyone who switched early on from a PC to a Mac is personally familiar with the interesting human psychology behind hostility towards Tesla and Elon Musk. The most interesting thing is that those who indulge in the negativity do not appear to know or care where it bubbles up from - it's fairly obvious, isn't it?

As mainstream manufacturers trip over themselves to introduce EVs, Tesla could be posting ads similar to those of Apple in 1995: "CONGRATS.W95".
The following 2 users liked this post by Adk46:
RonF (09-01-2019), westwest888 (09-01-2019)
Old 09-01-2019, 07:37 PM
  #1676  
Cloudplay
Instructor
 
Cloudplay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 105
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveo4porsche
I'll believe the number when I see them…if it's sub 3 seconds then woot! range is still going to be interesting.
While we're waiting for anything more useful from Porsche than comfortably under this and that, this may help kill some time:
Old 09-01-2019, 09:18 PM
  #1677  
Outlaw
Pro
 
Outlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 567
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Seems to me Tesla is a drivetrain and battery innovator, but the rest of the car not so evolved.
Old 09-01-2019, 09:43 PM
  #1678  
Lapis
Burning Brakes
 
Lapis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Outlaw
Seems to me Tesla is a drivetrain and battery innovator, but the rest of the car not so evolved.
Not that I’m a Tesla fan, but they also were ahead of their time on interior infotainment and controls user interfaces by way of integrating just about everything into a large central touch screen instead of dedicated buttons and switches. And also on software updates over the air to a car.

On the former, this is actually a reason I dislike Tesla. I prefer dedicated buttons, switches, dials, etc for the critical controls rather than everything on a big screen in nested menus, because dedicated switchgear is easier to use by feel, is less distracting while driving, and just looks and feels good. I suspect Tesla went this route more so to save costs than to really innovate. Software is cheaper than hardware.

But I really do wish other car manufacturers would follow Tesla’s lead for software updates. Why should our infotainment systems be frozen in time the year a car was made? They should update just like our iPhones with new features.
Old 09-01-2019, 10:37 PM
  #1679  
RonF
Racer
 
RonF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: California
Posts: 457
Received 95 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Not just infotainment system everything that controls the car can be updated over the air in a Tesla. The car can continue to improve not to mention It probably saved a lot of recalls and service visits. Don't know how hard it is but it's definitely something other manufactures should do too.
Old 09-01-2019, 11:08 PM
  #1680  
acoste
Burning Brakes
 
acoste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: California
Posts: 813
Received 138 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RonF
Not just infotainment system everything that controls the car can be updated over the air in a Tesla. The car can continue to improve not to mention It probably saved a lot of recalls and service visits. Don't know how hard it is but it's definitely something other manufactures should do too.
And that is the problem.

Updating infotainment system is ok. Updating anything that is related to safety and drivability is not ok. I want to buy a car that is complete when it is released to the public. Not a car that is still in beta version and a major brakes software update comes after the car is released because they skipped very basic tests. If we allow them to follow Tesla, companies won't complete cars by the release date because "I can always fix it later". No. I don't want to drive a beta.


Quick Reply: Tesla existential threat?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:29 PM.