New Spyder w/H&R Springs
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
New Spyder w/H&R Springs
Quick thanks to ECS Tuning for the springs and also to RSS for the spacers, not installed yet. Pictures attached show car with the springs installed and the 5mm spacers on the rear only. I have 7's front and rear on their way.
I'll post a few more picts when I get them installed.
I did not drive the car in stock form so I can not make the comparison but what I can tell you is that there is no harshness or poor ride quality issues. The Porsche tech that installed them said he loved it and also my wife was out for a few hours today driving it and also, NO complaints. She even admitted that she had a blast driving it and now claims it hers!
Thanks for all of the great information on this site!
I'll post a few more picts when I get them installed.
I did not drive the car in stock form so I can not make the comparison but what I can tell you is that there is no harshness or poor ride quality issues. The Porsche tech that installed them said he loved it and also my wife was out for a few hours today driving it and also, NO complaints. She even admitted that she had a blast driving it and now claims it hers!
Thanks for all of the great information on this site!
Last edited by Pete C; 11-11-2012 at 10:23 PM. Reason: 1
#2
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
What a beauty Pete!
Post some pictures after installing the 7mm spacers and again when you get the springs installed.
Post some pictures after installing the 7mm spacers and again when you get the springs installed.
#6
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#7
Rennlist Member
I really don't see a difference in ride height from my Stock Spyder. However, the springs will "Settle" in less than a month like they did on my Audi.
I want to see the rear spacer setup too.
I want to see the rear spacer setup too.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Link to dealer pictures, side profile definitley looks lower:
http://www.porschexchange.com/web/us...ition_id=10426
#9
I don't get it, why fit these when you have never driven a stock one ?
Again wider spacers on the rear will just cause more understeer !
Again wider spacers on the rear will just cause more understeer !
#10
After spring installation, spacers are ideal because the non-flush look of fender-to-tires will become more evident. However, I'm hesitant about spacers because they're not ideal for the track (if wider than 7-10 mm) due to increased stress on wheel bearings.
Haven't decided which way to go yet. Springs are also $$ to install (many hours of labor)...
#11
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Plus I ordered 7MM spacers front and rear.
Also, with the exception of my '02 GT2, I've lowered every car I've purchased
since 1991. I've also used spacers on a bunch. The typical performance gain is nice but it really cleans up the look...the way they should come from the factory.
Also, it was easier to get everything done before taking delivery. I also had the paddle/sport steering wheel & clear markers installed at the same time.
Vetman - if you want to come see it, you are more than welcome anytime.
#12
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
That was my next question...does anybody know if you can get more negative camber out of the Spyder by adding the springs.
I hear your point, but many people like the look of a lowered "aggressive" stance. Many also dislike the wide fender gap in stock cars (though less so in Spyders and Rs). You can also get more negative camber with a lowered car. Finally, springs give you firmer ride and better handling - especially cornering but also in braking and accelerating. The final point is why I'm interested in the springs.
After spring installation, spacers are ideal because the non-flush look of fender-to-tires will become more evident. However, I'm hesitant about spacers because they're not ideal for the track (if wider than 7-10 mm) due to increased stress on wheel bearings.
Haven't decided which way to go yet. Springs are also $$ to install (many hours of labor)...
After spring installation, spacers are ideal because the non-flush look of fender-to-tires will become more evident. However, I'm hesitant about spacers because they're not ideal for the track (if wider than 7-10 mm) due to increased stress on wheel bearings.
Haven't decided which way to go yet. Springs are also $$ to install (many hours of labor)...
#13
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#14
Pete, I'd love to come check out your beauty. I'm in Pottstown.
On an unrelated note, anyone know the best or easiest way to get the tire marks off of the clear bra and paint? My CW Spyder has already built up quite a bit of black marks from the bits of tire (clag) thrown around at the track. I have a bottle of Goo Gone but have been hesitant to use it... though I may try it on the fender where the clear bra is set to be replaced soon. Maybe I should make a separate thread about this.
On an unrelated note, anyone know the best or easiest way to get the tire marks off of the clear bra and paint? My CW Spyder has already built up quite a bit of black marks from the bits of tire (clag) thrown around at the track. I have a bottle of Goo Gone but have been hesitant to use it... though I may try it on the fender where the clear bra is set to be replaced soon. Maybe I should make a separate thread about this.
#15
Springs are always a half way house imo, if you want it to handle better fit coilovers,
Quite a few cars handle worse with after market springs as the damping rates are wrong.
As for spacers, the Spyder has a wider track any way, any wider and you just get road rash paint.
And as for wider on the rear I have already stated more understeer.
I guess some do all this for looks and not performance though.
Quite a few cars handle worse with after market springs as the damping rates are wrong.
As for spacers, the Spyder has a wider track any way, any wider and you just get road rash paint.
And as for wider on the rear I have already stated more understeer.
I guess some do all this for looks and not performance though.