Which brake fluid?
#1
Which brake fluid?
Need to flush my brake fluid before my fall season next month. What do you guys recommend?
http://www.suncoastparts.com/product/RBF660.html
http://www.suncoastparts.com/product/CASTROLSRF.html
It's a DD street car with stock pads BTW. Thanks.
http://www.suncoastparts.com/product/RBF660.html
http://www.suncoastparts.com/product/CASTROLSRF.html
It's a DD street car with stock pads BTW. Thanks.
#2
Stick with a street fluid. You will never be at risk of boiling the fluid on the street. You do not need a higher boiling point. By increasing the boiling point you also make the fluid more hygroscopic which means you will need to change the fluid more regularly.
#4
Makes perfect sense then and I apologize for incorrectly interpurting your post. In that case we have had great success with the Motul RBF600. Both are great fluids.
Trending Topics
#8
Stick with a street fluid. You will never be at risk of boiling the fluid on the street. You do not need a higher boiling point. By increasing the boiling point you also make the fluid more hygroscopic which means you will need to change the fluid more regularly.
#9
That what i used to believe and then was educated on Castrol SRF (and a few other high performance racing brake fluids).... seems that its hygroscopic qualities are even better than street fluid along with the higher boiling points. needs to be changed less often due to its fluid performance qualities.
#10
Brake fluid chemistry is complex to be sure. I have never seen any data that suggests that brake fluids with higher dry and wet boiling points are more or less hygroscopic because of the higher boiling points. Castro SRF is marketed as being less hygroscopic than "typical" brake fluids.
In my personal experience, I have found Castrol SRF to work better longer than any Motul product. More so than would seem to be indicated by the difference in wet boiling points.
In my personal experience, I have found Castrol SRF to work better longer than any Motul product. More so than would seem to be indicated by the difference in wet boiling points.
#11
Brake fluid chemistry is complex to be sure. I have never seen any data that suggests that brake fluids with higher dry and wet boiling points are more or less hygroscopic because of the higher boiling points. Castro SRF is marketed as being less hygroscopic than "typical" brake fluids.
In my personal experience, I have found Castrol SRF to work better longer than any Motul product. More so than would seem to be indicated by the difference in wet boiling points.
In my personal experience, I have found Castrol SRF to work better longer than any Motul product. More so than would seem to be indicated by the difference in wet boiling points.
Using SFR now in both my street car and the race car and seems to be better.
(vs the usual well known suspects)
good point about the wet boiling point, because if it had adsorbed any moisture from the air, boiling point would go down, not be higher.
#12
I"d throw Endless RF-650 into the mix of this conversation. I switched to it from Motul 600 (not the 660 mentioned here) a couple of seasons ago and could not be happier. I have better pedal feel now and my bleed intervals are 4x what they were with the Motul. As a matter of fact I could probably go longer on the bleed process It just gets to the point where I feel I should do it on time vs. degraded pedal feel
#13
I"d throw Endless RF-650 into the mix of this conversation. I switched to it from Motul 600 (not the 660 mentioned here) a couple of seasons ago and could not be happier. I have better pedal feel now and my bleed intervals are 4x what they were with the Motul. As a matter of fact I could probably go longer on the bleed process It just gets to the point where I feel I should do it on time vs. degraded pedal feel