Expired belts in DEs?
#31
Mr. Excitement
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Replacing belts evey 5 years does nothing to extend your life. On the other hand due to the fact we have to replace them time based rather than a wear based I have seen first hand people buying the bottom end rigs rather than better setups. Why not spend that money on a better belt rig and in 5 years a better fire supression system or a suit for someone that is not using one? The argument "it is cheap insurance" is not upheld by any data. It is clearly a way to increase sales on an otherwise durable device.
Why replace something that can be visualy inspected based on 0.0 data of time based failure? Thre are many items on a track car that are safety items that are visualy inspected.
With belts for many of the replacement cycles we are replacing same with same. Snell at least increases the standard a bit each time
Got to love the AU. Common sense abounds.
Why replace something that can be visualy inspected based on 0.0 data of time based failure? Thre are many items on a track car that are safety items that are visualy inspected.
With belts for many of the replacement cycles we are replacing same with same. Snell at least increases the standard a bit each time
Got to love the AU. Common sense abounds.
#32
Three Wheelin'
Like I said, 5 years is aggressive and covers the worst case scenario ...
#33
Mr. Excitement
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
It is not "aggressive" it is baseless. Aggressive would be to do a study and set replacement when the tested values first start to drop off not when the makers of the devices and sellers of the little stickers with letters on them simply say so without backing the timeline. Real world testing of belts of all ages would not be hard to do.
Proper install far outshines age in belt safety. I see some real poor setups in cars with logbooks or DE tech stickers on them. But a solid policy on installs is not as easy as go / no go based on a number. We go by numbers and feel like something is done.
Proper install far outshines age in belt safety. I see some real poor setups in cars with logbooks or DE tech stickers on them. But a solid policy on installs is not as easy as go / no go based on a number. We go by numbers and feel like something is done.
#34
Racer
Thank you for your many views on this controversial subject. Let me give you the reasoning behind the PCA decision to limit the harness belt life to five years.
First of all, as Manny stated, in another thread recently, we are a volunteer organization so in many cases we must rely on professional in certain areas, the SFI and FIA certification standards. In that context, when we write a DE Standard, it is written for all 140 PCA Regions, no exception and we hope we write them to not only make our events safer but easier to run and control.
Tech inspection prior to and grid tech at events is a very important aspect of our program to ensure that we have looked at each car before it enters the track. Most of our vehicles are street driven and thus, do not have a harness system. Very few harness systems are DOT legal for the street. The OEM belt is installed by the factory and thus have the final responsibility for the integrity of the restraint system which includes the air bags. Once the DE entrant installs a harness system, that system is no longer OEM and now falls under the PCA National Standards. FIA and SFI certify belts for a set period of time, 5 and 3 years ,respectively. PCA has chosen the five year period. It is easier for our tech inspectors to look at a date of expiration than to determine how much wear is appropriate or inappropriate for use. I do not think many of us have the knowledge to accurately make that call. All harness system are made to stretch on impact to minimize damage to our internal organs. How much wear may cause that "stretch" to break? Let's make it simple, folks ...look at a date just like we do for helmets. Most of us spend more money on tires in a year, than the cost of a harness system every five years.
Pete
First of all, as Manny stated, in another thread recently, we are a volunteer organization so in many cases we must rely on professional in certain areas, the SFI and FIA certification standards. In that context, when we write a DE Standard, it is written for all 140 PCA Regions, no exception and we hope we write them to not only make our events safer but easier to run and control.
Tech inspection prior to and grid tech at events is a very important aspect of our program to ensure that we have looked at each car before it enters the track. Most of our vehicles are street driven and thus, do not have a harness system. Very few harness systems are DOT legal for the street. The OEM belt is installed by the factory and thus have the final responsibility for the integrity of the restraint system which includes the air bags. Once the DE entrant installs a harness system, that system is no longer OEM and now falls under the PCA National Standards. FIA and SFI certify belts for a set period of time, 5 and 3 years ,respectively. PCA has chosen the five year period. It is easier for our tech inspectors to look at a date of expiration than to determine how much wear is appropriate or inappropriate for use. I do not think many of us have the knowledge to accurately make that call. All harness system are made to stretch on impact to minimize damage to our internal organs. How much wear may cause that "stretch" to break? Let's make it simple, folks ...look at a date just like we do for helmets. Most of us spend more money on tires in a year, than the cost of a harness system every five years.
Pete
#35
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Most of us spend more money on tires in a year, than the cost of a harness system every five years.
Pete your statement here is ....dead on.
Pete your statement here is ....dead on.
__________________
Clark
ApexPerformance.net
Premier Racing Outfitters
Toll free: 866-505-2739
Direct: 843-299-0997
EM: chamerly@apexperformance.net
www.apexperformance.net
Save 10% on your next order over $75 on most items- enter Promocode Rennlist-10 on your next order or mention Rennlist during your phone order.
PCA Club Racing - National Sponsor
Clark
ApexPerformance.net
Premier Racing Outfitters
Toll free: 866-505-2739
Direct: 843-299-0997
EM: chamerly@apexperformance.net
www.apexperformance.net
Save 10% on your next order over $75 on most items- enter Promocode Rennlist-10 on your next order or mention Rennlist during your phone order.
PCA Club Racing - National Sponsor
#36
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thank you for your many views on this controversial subject. Let me give you the reasoning behind the PCA decision to limit the harness belt life to five years.
First of all, as Manny stated, in another thread recently, we are a volunteer organization so in many cases we must rely on professional in certain areas, the SFI and FIA certification standards. In that context, when we write a DE Standard, it is written for all 140 PCA Regions, no exception and we hope we write them to not only make our events safer but easier to run and control.
Tech inspection prior to and grid tech at events is a very important aspect of our program to ensure that we have looked at each car before it enters the track. Most of our vehicles are street driven and thus, do not have a harness system. Very few harness systems are DOT legal for the street. The OEM belt is installed by the factory and thus have the final responsibility for the integrity of the restraint system which includes the air bags. Once the DE entrant installs a harness system, that system is no longer OEM and now falls under the PCA National Standards. FIA and SFI certify belts for a set period of time, 5 and 3 years ,respectively. PCA has chosen the five year period. It is easier for our tech inspectors to look at a date of expiration than to determine how much wear is appropriate or inappropriate for use. I do not think many of us have the knowledge to accurately make that call. All harness system are made to stretch on impact to minimize damage to our internal organs. How much wear may cause that "stretch" to break? Let's make it simple, folks ...look at a date just like we do for helmets. Most of us spend more money on tires in a year, than the cost of a harness system every five years.
Pete
First of all, as Manny stated, in another thread recently, we are a volunteer organization so in many cases we must rely on professional in certain areas, the SFI and FIA certification standards. In that context, when we write a DE Standard, it is written for all 140 PCA Regions, no exception and we hope we write them to not only make our events safer but easier to run and control.
Tech inspection prior to and grid tech at events is a very important aspect of our program to ensure that we have looked at each car before it enters the track. Most of our vehicles are street driven and thus, do not have a harness system. Very few harness systems are DOT legal for the street. The OEM belt is installed by the factory and thus have the final responsibility for the integrity of the restraint system which includes the air bags. Once the DE entrant installs a harness system, that system is no longer OEM and now falls under the PCA National Standards. FIA and SFI certify belts for a set period of time, 5 and 3 years ,respectively. PCA has chosen the five year period. It is easier for our tech inspectors to look at a date of expiration than to determine how much wear is appropriate or inappropriate for use. I do not think many of us have the knowledge to accurately make that call. All harness system are made to stretch on impact to minimize damage to our internal organs. How much wear may cause that "stretch" to break? Let's make it simple, folks ...look at a date just like we do for helmets. Most of us spend more money on tires in a year, than the cost of a harness system every five years.
Pete
buy best buy latest install properly and use it right.
if only your life that matters.
#37
Rennlist Member
I am comfortable replacing belts every five years. Can't imagine wearing the same helmet to expiration either because it gets really disgusting with wear long before.
I'm happy spending relatively minor sums of money on stuff that might keep me alive given how much I **** away on fuel, tires other consumables and general mechanical twerking.. I'm OK with doing this by date since a visual inspection is too abstract and subject to opinion.
And notice that they don't actually insist that we prove that we've replaced our belts after a serious accident. They assume that we aren't complete fools. Need a regulation there!!!
Oh but what the hell.. Its time for our semi-annual rant about replacing stuff that just might keep us alive.
I'm happy spending relatively minor sums of money on stuff that might keep me alive given how much I **** away on fuel, tires other consumables and general mechanical twerking.. I'm OK with doing this by date since a visual inspection is too abstract and subject to opinion.
And notice that they don't actually insist that we prove that we've replaced our belts after a serious accident. They assume that we aren't complete fools. Need a regulation there!!!
Oh but what the hell.. Its time for our semi-annual rant about replacing stuff that just might keep us alive.
#38
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by TREMPER
The OEM belt is installed by the factory and thus have the final responsibility for the integrity of the restraint system which includes the air bags.
#39
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco & parts north
Posts: 1,013
Received 197 Likes
on
88 Posts
TWERKING? Wow! How much extra does that cost?
Oh...and re: belts. I tighten mine at least once during every session. Isn't it surprising how much they stretch when they are under constant static tension plus enduring an ever-changing dynamic load-vector from your bodyweight being thrown around at 1-1.5g's all session? (Note this is apples-to-oranges different from what an OEM inertial-reel belt sees in normal use on the street, BTW).
I have no problem with a 5 year replacement cycle on a fabric component that changes shape during every single usage-cycle. How many sessions do you run in 5 years? It holds my life in the balance.
Oh...and re: belts. I tighten mine at least once during every session. Isn't it surprising how much they stretch when they are under constant static tension plus enduring an ever-changing dynamic load-vector from your bodyweight being thrown around at 1-1.5g's all session? (Note this is apples-to-oranges different from what an OEM inertial-reel belt sees in normal use on the street, BTW).
I have no problem with a 5 year replacement cycle on a fabric component that changes shape during every single usage-cycle. How many sessions do you run in 5 years? It holds my life in the balance.
#40
I ordered new belts- I received them. My associate pointed out in the rules of NJMP that for DE belts can just be "inspected" rather than replaced on expiration date. Racers are different. Not sure of position of each PCA region on belts for DE. They ain't cheap!! I'll contact some of the local regions. I always try to comply with expected standards on my vehicle
#41
Rennlist Member
Five Years
I ordered new belts- I received them. My associate pointed out in the rules of NJMP that for DE belts can just be "inspected" rather than replaced on expiration date. Racers are different. Not sure of position of each PCA region on belts for DE. They ain't cheap!! I'll contact some of the local regions. I always try to comply with expected standards on my vehicle
From www.pca.org
Harness Systems: ..... Due to UV degradation and wear the harness webbing must be replaced every five years. Four point systems are not allowed in Porsches because of the integrated headrest supplied by the factory. In addition to the standard SFI and/ or FIA approved 5- and/or 6-point system, a 4-point system is allowed in non-Porsches that meet the following requirements:
- Meets the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 209.
- Attaches to the factory seat belt mounting points.
- Each belt is designed to work in a specific vehicle and that vehicle tag must be attached to the belt system.
Last edited by bella1; 01-09-2014 at 11:43 AM.
#42
Rennlist Member
We in NJ have become so used to government managing our lives from cradle to grave we are now incapable of deciding these things for our selves. Good thing theres a law in NJ or we would be using bungies.
#43
Bungies !! yes!! I remember when EMRA used vice grips as fuel regulators on some of their cars. After adjustment they would use racers tape to attach to fire wall. !!! I think they also had soldered rollcages. lol- It's just weird that NJMP would exclude DE when originally I remember the State Troppers were check belts on Thunderbolt tech.. . I'm just looking for confirmation from Local Chapters that these will be checked at Tech. I am also going to check with NASA, HOD, FCA, FOC, SCDA, etc out of curiosity. - they probably need to check with the insurance underwriters on this technicality. ( new belt are dated 2019)
#44
NNJR PCA- yes- belts need replacement for DE- on Tech form. NASA- inspection at DE for belt condition only- Racers must replace. HOD - inspect only.
Last edited by Gofishracing; 01-09-2014 at 12:42 PM.
#45
Nordschleife Master
My first career was in the rock climbing and mountaineering industry. The webbing used in waist harnesses and slings and runners for protection is very similar to seat belt webbing. All the climbing manufacturers strongly suggested replacing everything every 5 years.
Their claim was that the nylon loses 10% of its strength per year due to uv exposure and other degradation. So after 5 years they asserted that the webbing was now only 50% as strong as when new.
A lot of climbers use the stuff for much longer than that. I see guys at the crags wearing harnesses that haven't been made since the 90's. Its their life and their choice.
But when you get a track, and a sanctioning body, and insurance involved it becomes a different game. It may not be 100% agreeable but it really does make sense.
Just today I am buying a set of expired Sparcos for my 912 hot rod. Car will never see the track but you can bet those 2010 Sparcos are safer than my 1967 lap belts.
Their claim was that the nylon loses 10% of its strength per year due to uv exposure and other degradation. So after 5 years they asserted that the webbing was now only 50% as strong as when new.
A lot of climbers use the stuff for much longer than that. I see guys at the crags wearing harnesses that haven't been made since the 90's. Its their life and their choice.
But when you get a track, and a sanctioning body, and insurance involved it becomes a different game. It may not be 100% agreeable but it really does make sense.
Just today I am buying a set of expired Sparcos for my 912 hot rod. Car will never see the track but you can bet those 2010 Sparcos are safer than my 1967 lap belts.