Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Wild ride at Mid Ohio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2011 | 10:25 AM
  #46  
S4ordie's Avatar
S4ordie
Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,856
Likes: 335
From: Chandler, AZ, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Default

Not me.
Old 08-17-2011 | 10:31 AM
  #47  
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 2,248
From: Up Nort
Default

Originally Posted by finally!
928? and 944 off the track... Red one might be a 968?
I was there with a different team, that is a 968. There were zero 928's at Mid-Ohio this past weekend. At least I didn't see any.
Old 08-17-2011 | 10:44 AM
  #48  
Jim Child's Avatar
Jim Child
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 11
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by finally!

928? and 944 off the track... Red one might be a 968?
Those pictures are the aftermath of the incident discussed in this thread. The red car is a 968, and the white car on its roof is a 944 S2.
Old 08-17-2011 | 12:54 PM
  #49  
Randy V's Avatar
Randy V
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 40,449
Likes: 98
From: Insane Diego, California
Default

Originally Posted by finally!


928? and 944 off the track... Red one might be a 968?




Banned from the 928 Club for mistaking a 968 for a real Porsche.

Old 08-17-2011 | 01:02 PM
  #50  
pmcrespo's Avatar
pmcrespo
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Cape Coral, FL
Default

Glad to read you are ok Mike. Same for the other driver of course.
Old 08-17-2011 | 03:00 PM
  #51  
KLR's Avatar
KLR
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Default

FWIW, I wouldn’t want anyone to conclude from this thread that NASA tolerates contact or that cars are more prone to damage in a NASA race than with other sanctioning bodies. At fault contact results in a DQ in a NASA race. The definition of “at fault” is very clearly spelled out in the NASA rule book for almost every conceivable incident (they have diagrams). The GTS series also uses a 13/13 rule, however, all series are policed by a points system that identifies and deals with repeat offenders rapidly.

Cars are not required to pit after contact in SCCA, NASA, or most other independent sanctioning body races. There’s nothing wrong with a series requiring a pit in, but standard operating procedure the world over is that racers are permitted to continue at their discretion after contact.

I’ve raced with NASA Midwest and Great Lakes for 2 years. I’ve been to several PCA club races (as a DE participant) and IMHO the carnage rate is similar.
Old 08-17-2011 | 04:06 PM
  #52  
Racerrob's Avatar
Racerrob
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 19
Default

So, what if any penalties were administered over this wreck?
Old 08-17-2011 | 04:22 PM
  #53  
dave morris's Avatar
dave morris
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 22
Default

Hard to believe the driver of the white car was a rookie. Somebody from NASA should have a serious sit down discussion with him. I'd be seriously considering a ban.
Old 08-17-2011 | 04:29 PM
  #54  
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 2
From: Lexington, KY
Default

He may not be a rookie. He has lots of racing videos on his Vimeo page.
Old 08-17-2011 | 04:29 PM
  #55  
Bigpinekey's Avatar
Bigpinekey
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Default

Per the CCR:

"13.3 Provisional License Revocation
The Race Director or the Event Chairman may revoke a Provisional License for any reason."

I assumed he was a rookie because he still had the R on his car.
Old 08-17-2011 | 04:35 PM
  #56  
gums's Avatar
gums
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 5
From: New York, NY
Default

better be careful here guys, we've been down this road before; seems like a clear culprit, but we haven't heard his side yet.
Old 08-17-2011 | 08:36 PM
  #57  
Speedtoys's Avatar
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 13,582
Likes: 1,034
From: Boulder Creek, CA
Default

Mike:

Im acting in RD and Tech Chief roles at NASA Nats this year...stop by tech and say hi!
Old 08-17-2011 | 08:50 PM
  #58  
Speedtoys's Avatar
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 13,582
Likes: 1,034
From: Boulder Creek, CA
Default

Originally Posted by KLR
FWIW, I wouldn’t want anyone to conclude from this thread that NASA tolerates contact or that cars are more prone to damage in a NASA race than with other sanctioning bodies. At fault contact results in a DQ in a NASA race. The definition of “at fault” is very clearly spelled out in the NASA rule book for almost every conceivable incident (they have diagrams). The GTS series also uses a 13/13 rule, however, all series are policed by a points system that identifies and deals with repeat offenders rapidly.

Cars are not required to pit after contact in SCCA, NASA, or most other independent sanctioning body races. There’s nothing wrong with a series requiring a pit in, but standard operating procedure the world over is that racers are permitted to continue at their discretion after contact.

I’ve raced with NASA Midwest and Great Lakes for 2 years. I’ve been to several PCA club races (as a DE participant) and IMHO the carnage rate is similar.

"At fault contact results in a DQ in a NASA race."


There are three levels of 'contact' that involve NASA penalties.

-Any contact causing deviation, with no damage, but loss of a position: Reposition.
-Any contact resulting in “damage” as defined by these guidelines: One (1) race suspension.
-Any contact resulting in a “punt” as defined by these guidelines: Disqualification.
-Any contact resulting in damage and punt: Disqualification and one (1) race suspension.


I DQ'd a racer this last weekend over contact/damage with loss of position..but I was overruled in an appeal where other evidence was presented, which is fine...we take it seriously, and if a region isnt taking it seriously, National Office needs to know about it.


Requiring a pit-in is a bad idea..because that affects the race. You deal with issues -after- a race, because its far too easy to be wrong up in the tower during the race. Observing the racer contact reports, in-car video, and viewing where the contact was on both cars..helps tell the larger story you really cant get most of the time from the tower.

One of the very few pit-in penalties that exists, are jumped starts requiring a stop & go.
Old 08-17-2011 | 09:27 PM
  #59  
VaSteve's Avatar
VaSteve
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Default

Looked like you both were on the grass to the right by the time his car pops out in front.

What's up with those wings. Someone told me "all the guys in Ohio were running a big wing" He wasn't kidding!
Old 08-18-2011 | 10:49 AM
  #60  
911racer's Avatar
911racer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 3
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by North Coast Cab
Glad they were both ok.

BMW got blacked flagged.

Race ended under FCY - worked out ok for some
I am glad that there was not a one lap blast to the checker like the one mid ohio race we had last year. That was nerve racking.

Ed


Quick Reply: Wild ride at Mid Ohio



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:29 AM.