Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Watkins Glen Cayman Interseries crash at Connecticut PCA DE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2011, 10:10 PM
  #196  
MUSSBERGER
uninformed gas bag
(contemplating on whether gas bag is one or two words)
Rennlist Member
 
MUSSBERGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne Beach
Posts: 20,514
Received 171 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Qwickrick
Car cannot accelerate when you lose it on grass unless Newton's laws of physics don't apply there. What you are feeling, is the difference in the rate of DECELERATION.
Unless it's a grassy down slope.
MUSSBERGER is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 02:27 PM
  #197  
bobt993
Rennlist Member
 
bobt993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 3,077
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

actually if your car is sliding on the track, leaves the track and hits wet grass it will pick up speed (yes it will). I have unfortunately had this happen avoiding a spinning car on a drying track and when I looked the data trace it sure did happen.
bobt993 is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 02:40 PM
  #198  
winders
Race Car
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Martin, CA
Posts: 4,553
Received 865 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bobt993
actually if your car is sliding on the track, leaves the track and hits wet grass it will pick up speed (yes it will). I have unfortunately had this happen avoiding a spinning car on a drying track and when I looked the data trace it sure did happen.
Not possible unless you are sliding downhill.......

Scott
winders is online now  
Old 07-04-2011, 02:59 PM
  #199  
sundog
Race Director
 
sundog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 17,585
Received 197 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bobt993
actually if your car is sliding on the track, leaves the track and hits wet grass it will pick up speed (yes it will). I have unfortunately had this happen avoiding a spinning car on a drying track and when I looked the data trace it sure did happen.
You will have less deceleration on the grass, and therefore it seems like the car is speeding up. The velocity vector of the center of mass will not increase without power being supplied to accelerate the car.
sundog is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 03:18 PM
  #200  
winders
Race Car
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Martin, CA
Posts: 4,553
Received 865 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

As sundog suggests, even wet grass has friction so the car will continue to slow down, so the car cannot pickup speed unless their is enough slope for gravity to overcome the friction from the grass. Simple physics really....

Scott
winders is online now  
Old 07-04-2011, 03:26 PM
  #201  
Circuit Motorsports
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Circuit Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,183
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by winders
As sundog suggests, even wet grass has friction so the car will continue to slow down, so the car cannot pickup speed unless their is enough slope for gravity to overcome the friction from the grass. Simple physics really....

Scott
Just remember that a spinning car is not simple physics. And I'd bet that bobt993 is talking about actual data when he mentions something that shows a speed increase.
Circuit Motorsports is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 03:33 PM
  #202  
winders
Race Car
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Martin, CA
Posts: 4,553
Received 865 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Circuit Motorsports
Just remember that a spinning car is not simple physics. And I'd bet that bobt993 is talking about actual data when he mentions something that shows a speed increase.
A spinning object is not different than a non-spinning object in this situation. At least in regards to the acceleration issues being discussed. The speed of the spin may very well increase but the speed of the car cannot.

Scott
winders is online now  
Old 07-04-2011, 03:37 PM
  #203  
Circuit Motorsports
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Circuit Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,183
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by winders
A spinning object is not different than a non-spinning object in this situation. At least in regards to the acceleration issues being discussed. The speed of the spin may very well increase but the speed of the car cannot.

Scott
It is different. Think about how the speed of the spin could increase and work backwards towards what if the speed of the spin decreased....
Circuit Motorsports is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 03:53 PM
  #204  
bobt993
Rennlist Member
 
bobt993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 3,077
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I tried to arrest this by sending a PM. Linear velocity is handled different than angular velocity where you must factor in the physical radius. V is proportional to the R. Cars go off tracks in corners where they are using grip along a radius to move forward (hopefully). If you go straight off after locking up your brakes that is a different situation and not what I encountered. My car swerved avoiding a spinning car then continued into a very wet corner where the car lost grip from leaving the track prior. The once loss of asphalt lat grip to now grass (which is less than half that of asphalt when wet) changed the corner radius slide I attempting to stay on. " R" basically went to infinity and ended at a guard rail.
bobt993 is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 04:22 PM
  #205  
winders
Race Car
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Martin, CA
Posts: 4,553
Received 865 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Circuit Motorsports
It is different. Think about how the speed of the spin could increase and work backwards towards what if the speed of the spin decreased....
Except that you are going from a surface with more friction to one with less friction. So the speed of the spin cannot decrease any faster than the speed of the car compared what was happening on pavement. The rate of spin could not decrease any faster in relation to the linear velocity so the linear speed cannot increase.

Scott
winders is online now  
Old 07-04-2011, 04:58 PM
  #206  
magnetic1
Racer
 
magnetic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bobt993
I tried to arrest this by sending a PM. Linear velocity is handled different than angular velocity where you must factor in the physical radius. V is proportional to the R. Cars go off tracks in corners where they are using grip along a radius to move forward (hopefully). If you go straight off after locking up your brakes that is a different situation and not what I encountered. My car swerved avoiding a spinning car then continued into a very wet corner where the car lost grip from leaving the track prior. The once loss of asphalt lat grip to now grass (which is less than half that of asphalt when wet) changed the corner radius slide I attempting to stay on. " R" basically went to infinity and ended at a guard rail.
Bob, I agree with you on many things, but this one I dont. You cant introduce more forces than you had before.

It is impossible to accelerate by going off into wet grass unless you either hit the gas or go downhill. Data may have showed an increase in velocity which was a result of one of the other two scenarios.

Rate of deceleration will be less, sure. Acceleration? No. That would be defying laws of physics.
magnetic1 is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 05:10 PM
  #207  
bobt993
Rennlist Member
 
bobt993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 3,077
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by magnetic1
Bob, I agree with you on many things, but this one I dont. You cant introduce more forces than you had before.

It is impossible to accelerate by going off into wet grass unless you either hit the gas or go downhill. Data may have showed an increase in velocity which was a result of one of the other two scenarios.

Rate of deceleration will be less, sure. Acceleration? No. That would be defying laws of physics.
Eric,

I think were arguing two sides of a coin. My point is leaving a track onto a wet surface and losing the forward motion leaving the corner the car does pick up speed in the direction you want least (towards the wall). The sensation is the car is accelerating just not in the direction you wanted (you have traded cornering speed for a very fast slide in one direction). You are losing one vector of your course direction and exchanging angular velocity for a somewhat larger radius towards a very hard surface.
bobt993 is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 05:52 PM
  #208  
J richard
Rennlist Member
 
J richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,639
Received 39 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

...I miss Kibort...
J richard is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 02:27 AM
  #209  
J richard
Rennlist Member
 
J richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,639
Received 39 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

...he would have charts & graphs...
J richard is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 02:43 AM
  #210  
winders
Race Car
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Martin, CA
Posts: 4,553
Received 865 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bobt993
I think were arguing two sides of a coin. My point is leaving a track onto a wet surface and losing the forward motion leaving the corner the car does pick up speed in the direction you want least (towards the wall). The sensation is the car is accelerating just not in the direction you wanted (you have traded cornering speed for a very fast slide in one direction). You are losing one vector of your course direction and exchanging angular velocity for a somewhat larger radius towards a very hard surface.
But, that is not what you said previously. You said:

"actually if your car is sliding on the track, leaves the track and hits wet grass it will pick up speed (yes it will)."


That statement is false. The direction can change, but the speed does not increase. In fact, it is always decreasing.

This link explains the feeling of acceleration:

http://courses.ncssm.edu/aphys/labs/elab1/jerk.html

Scott
winders is online now  


Quick Reply: Watkins Glen Cayman Interseries crash at Connecticut PCA DE



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:43 PM.