Gloves Off in Austin?
#46
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First of all I'd dispense with a name that has the word "circuit" in it's makeup!
Why? Because it sounds pretentious and needs to stay over yonder in Europa where names like that belong. This is TEXAS for God's sakes. Down to earth and God fearing. Keep it simple without going all The Retaard.
Austin Motor Speedway
Want to make it more rustic? Toss some local color on top and slow cook till moist and tender... just like an awesome brisket.
Balcones Fault Raceway
Travis
Pow. Pop. You want a Circuit of the Americas? Just drive around the 410 in San Antonio any day of the week.
Austin Motor Speedway
Want to make it more rustic? Toss some local color on top and slow cook till moist and tender... just like an awesome brisket.
Balcones Fault Raceway
Travis
Pow. Pop. You want a Circuit of the Americas? Just drive around the 410 in San Antonio any day of the week.
#49
Rennlist Member
Why is this bull**** masquerading as a discussion about a racetrack not pushed off to the OT forum? Crap like this self flagellation is really knocking this forum down (and with THIS group that's really saying something...)
#50
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Loosen your bullets Zonie... just the muchachos having some fun for God's sakes!
Serve it up amigo!
#51
Rennlist Member
Corporate welfare almost never works because it is based on flawed and biased justification. As a former elected public official (village board) I agreed with helping out new ventures for a few years at most when the public funding could make the difference between success and failure and there were quality of life issues, for example improving roads helped in bringing a new grocery store into an area that did not have one.
Sports arenas are a great example of the failure of optomistic projections to bear out the justification for tax breaks, added investment in roads, and investments. Most of these just foster redistribution of wealth (or theft) from the middle class to wealthy investors. Read "Public Funding of Sports Arenas" by the University of Utah for detailed support.
As much as I want F1 in the US, building a new track is a waste of public money. If a few wealthy people want to fund this then fine. I just see this as the people of Texas being fooled again.
Sports arenas are a great example of the failure of optomistic projections to bear out the justification for tax breaks, added investment in roads, and investments. Most of these just foster redistribution of wealth (or theft) from the middle class to wealthy investors. Read "Public Funding of Sports Arenas" by the University of Utah for detailed support.
As much as I want F1 in the US, building a new track is a waste of public money. If a few wealthy people want to fund this then fine. I just see this as the people of Texas being fooled again.
#52
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well said Tedster!
#54
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just read most of that report you mentioned regarding public funding for such events!
Corporate welfare almost never works because it is based on flawed and biased justification. As a former elected public official (village board) I agreed with helping out new ventures for a few years at most when the public funding could make the difference between success and failure and there were quality of life issues, for example improving roads helped in bringing a new grocery store into an area that did not have one.
Sports arenas are a great example of the failure of optomistic projections to bear out the justification for tax breaks, added investment in roads, and investments. Most of these just foster redistribution of wealth (or theft) from the middle class to wealthy investors. Read "Public Funding of Sports Arenas" by the University of Utah for detailed support.
As much as I want F1 in the US, building a new track is a waste of public money. If a few wealthy people want to fund this then fine. I just see this as the people of Texas being fooled again.
Sports arenas are a great example of the failure of optomistic projections to bear out the justification for tax breaks, added investment in roads, and investments. Most of these just foster redistribution of wealth (or theft) from the middle class to wealthy investors. Read "Public Funding of Sports Arenas" by the University of Utah for detailed support.
As much as I want F1 in the US, building a new track is a waste of public money. If a few wealthy people want to fund this then fine. I just see this as the people of Texas being fooled again.
What's really kooky about all this is the massive risk these fellows have been willing to take. F1 is a niche of a niche here in the US. Even at a seasoned venue such as Indianapolis we all saw attendance drop substantially with each passing year.
Odd.
#55
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
There are enough F1 fans to fill the stand at 1 US GP. Indy seats hundreds of thousands of people making it a very unique venue. Even at it's lowest point of attendance (and this includes the year after the Micheline Tire Debable), Indy still had more spectators than any other race on the calender so I don't buy that the US won't support a GP here. And we know that the manufacterers want a race here as it's their biggest market.
I don't like any public funds being used for private businesses, especially during these economic times. In the end I don't believe the $25m they are talking about is going to make or break the track from happening.
I don't like any public funds being used for private businesses, especially during these economic times. In the end I don't believe the $25m they are talking about is going to make or break the track from happening.
#56
Rennlist Member
And again, the supposed "public funds" are an advance rebate on anticipated sales taxes derived from the venue. No venue = no sales taxes = no economic benefit = no alleged "public funds".
Some pretty simple FACTS lost or purposely ignored by the dip****s who don't want this track and/or race to happen.
Some pretty simple FACTS lost or purposely ignored by the dip****s who don't want this track and/or race to happen.
#57
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't think they'll complete it in time for the 2012 date hombre!
There are enough F1 fans to fill the stand at 1 US GP. Indy seats hundreds of thousands of people making it a very unique venue. Even at it's lowest point of attendance (and this includes the year after the Micheline Tire Debacle), Indy still had more spectators than any other race on the calender so I don't buy that the US won't support a GP here. And we know that the manufacterers want a race here as it's their biggest market.
I don't like any public funds being used for private businesses, especially during these economic times. In the end I don't believe the $25m they are talking about is going to make or break the track from happening.
I don't like any public funds being used for private businesses, especially during these economic times. In the end I don't believe the $25m they are talking about is going to make or break the track from happening.
This entire PROJECT has impending fiasco written all over it, no matter how hard some sad Transplantos stomp their feet and hold their collective breaths.
This teacher firing coming down at the same time is making Texas look not so good. Here's a thought. If McCombs is willing to pay $280.000,000 for a shrine to his legacy... why even bother the state for the measly $25,000,000 going to paid out to that Evil Bernie every year?
Well?
#58
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Frankie, you and I are from California. We KNOW the politicians here have screwed the pooch pretty badly. The stadium/arenas fiasco in ARIZONA should be an embarassment to everyone there. I tend to hold Texans in higher regard. They appear to be more "logical" and have more common sense any other states. Just my .02 and worth what you paid for it.
The roads to and from have to be addressed. I remember Silverstone from years ago where the Brits couldn't even get to the race because of the cluster. They worked it out the following year. Hopefully the CoTA will learn from that experience that happened not too long ago at an older established track.
The roads to and from have to be addressed. I remember Silverstone from years ago where the Brits couldn't even get to the race because of the cluster. They worked it out the following year. Hopefully the CoTA will learn from that experience that happened not too long ago at an older established track.
#59
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quite the eye-opener Tedster!
Read "Public Funding of Sports Arenas" by the University of Utah for detailed support.
As much as I want F1 in the US, building a new track is a waste of public money. If a few wealthy people want to fund this then fine. I just see this as the people of Texas being fooled again.
As much as I want F1 in the US, building a new track is a waste of public money. If a few wealthy people want to fund this then fine. I just see this as the people of Texas being fooled again.
http://www.cppa.utah.edu/publication...s_Stadiums.pdf
#60
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Texans can go all "crazy politico" on par with anyone from The Golden State amigo!
Frankie, you and I are from California. We KNOW the politicians here have screwed the pooch pretty badly. The stadium/arenas fiasco in ARIZONA should be an embarassment to everyone there. I tend to hold Texans in higher regard. They appear to be more "logical" and have more common sense any other states. Just my .02 and worth what you paid for it.
The roads to and from have to be addressed. I remember Silverstone from years ago where the Brits couldn't even get to the race because of the cluster. They worked it out the following year. Hopefully the CoTA will learn from that experience that happened not too long ago at an older established track.
The roads to and from have to be addressed. I remember Silverstone from years ago where the Brits couldn't even get to the race because of the cluster. They worked it out the following year. Hopefully the CoTA will learn from that experience that happened not too long ago at an older established track.
CoTA. That is the silliest name EVER!