ASK THE COACH
#2701
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 19,052
Received 3,192 Likes
on
1,841 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The publicly available information for many tracks is not correct.
That's why the IMSA event track walks are populated with engineers, including Porsche AG engineers taking actual measurements. Some of the raw laser-scanned data is useful, but I like OptimumLap, myself.
Also, there exists a portable "learning"'device that will deliver that information real-time, that is likely to be available soon...
That's why the IMSA event track walks are populated with engineers, including Porsche AG engineers taking actual measurements. Some of the raw laser-scanned data is useful, but I like OptimumLap, myself.
Also, there exists a portable "learning"'device that will deliver that information real-time, that is likely to be available soon...
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
#2702
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
unlikely...
its a combination of elevation changes, camber, track surface, tires and track conditions and that is assuming car, weight, setup are all constant.....
in my GT4 on RE71R I never see more than 1.3x G sustained on flat corners;
some days I can t get to those numbers (cold, wet)
some corners I cant get to those numbers; especially higher speed corners I tend to see lower numbers (maybe I should look for a set of bigger *****)
some times my tires are head cycled out and I cant get to these numbers
etc
btw did you mean you wanted to look for highest vMin in corners instead of vMax?
its a combination of elevation changes, camber, track surface, tires and track conditions and that is assuming car, weight, setup are all constant.....
in my GT4 on RE71R I never see more than 1.3x G sustained on flat corners;
some days I can t get to those numbers (cold, wet)
some corners I cant get to those numbers; especially higher speed corners I tend to see lower numbers (maybe I should look for a set of bigger *****)
some times my tires are head cycled out and I cant get to these numbers
etc
btw did you mean you wanted to look for highest vMin in corners instead of vMax?
My problem; and it's one that most driver have, is that while my conscious brain has no idea how fast I can enter a given corner, my subconscious has a very strict idea. Whenever I KNOW, from comparing data that I can carry more speed, I'm able to convince my subconscious and it lets it happen. I'm just trying to find other ways to do that.
#2703
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's a great device. I've been evaluating one for a couple of weeks. I was playing with it in the Yukon XL today!
I see just under 1.3 Gs (1.26) max in my SPB across several fairly flat tracks. It's a little less at Sebring though and I'm not sure if that is because of slight camber at other tracks or less grip at Sebring. I'm looking for the Vmax for corners in isolation for that LatGmax and a given R. I know published radii would only be valid for a corner if it's taken square but it's a good starting point. I could extrapolate a bit from there.
My problem; and it's one that most driver have, is that while my conscious brain has no idea how fast I can enter a given corner, my subconscious has a very strict idea. Whenever I KNOW, from comparing data that I can carry more speed, I'm able to convince my subconscious and it lets it happen. I'm just trying to find other ways to do that.
My problem; and it's one that most driver have, is that while my conscious brain has no idea how fast I can enter a given corner, my subconscious has a very strict idea. Whenever I KNOW, from comparing data that I can carry more speed, I'm able to convince my subconscious and it lets it happen. I'm just trying to find other ways to do that.
Assuming you have an AiM device, the math channel for corner radius is band_pass((Speed*MPH2FTS)^2/(LatAcc*32.2),-2000,2000)
You have to make sure the "Speed" and "latacc" match what your logger channel name is.
I posted up a thread on how to create math channels and gave Roger Caddell's math channel info at https://rennlist.com/forums/data-acq...nel-video.html
#2704
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 19,052
Received 3,192 Likes
on
1,841 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's available now and has been for a bit. They exhibited at PRI too. https://apextrackcoach.com/
It's a really cool piece, but the first production batch has yet to be made.
#2705
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 19,052
Received 3,192 Likes
on
1,841 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#2706
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's available now and has been for a bit. They exhibited at PRI too. https://apextrackcoach.com/
It's a great device. I've been evaluating one for a couple of weeks. I was playing with it in the Yukon XL today!
Use your data and then you will have the correct radius that you actually drive.
Assuming you have an AiM device, the math channel for corner radius is band_pass((Speed*MPH2FTS)^2/(LatAcc*32.2),-2000,2000)
You have to make sure the "Speed" and "latacc" match what your logger channel name is.
I posted up a thread on how to create math channels and gave Roger Caddell's math channel info at https://rennlist.com/forums/data-acq...nel-video.html
It's a great device. I've been evaluating one for a couple of weeks. I was playing with it in the Yukon XL today!
Use your data and then you will have the correct radius that you actually drive.
Assuming you have an AiM device, the math channel for corner radius is band_pass((Speed*MPH2FTS)^2/(LatAcc*32.2),-2000,2000)
You have to make sure the "Speed" and "latacc" match what your logger channel name is.
I posted up a thread on how to create math channels and gave Roger Caddell's math channel info at https://rennlist.com/forums/data-acq...nel-video.html
#2707
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I prefer to have concrete circuit info. This is a good way to do it: https://racelogic.support/02VBOX_Mot...n_Google_Earth
Plus, why would you not use the driven line? It will always be different than the actual inside/outside/mid track radius, usually by a good amount. For instance, the published radius for turn 13 at Sebring is 130', while the data shows the driven radius is about 190' feet.
#2708
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
An original Mychron I? That would be an oldie! I'll offer you a good upgrade if that is what you have. Heck, I'll offer a deal either way!
#2709
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#2710
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 19,052
Received 3,192 Likes
on
1,841 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hah! I wouldn't EVER want to calculate the theoretical and desirable velocity or loading through THAT corner, based on a number like that! Too many variables with surface height and tire loading.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#2711
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 19,052
Received 3,192 Likes
on
1,841 Posts
#2712
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So do you get radii from Google Earth? I know you can draw a radius circle, but that would take a long time to do for each corner, let along track. What you posted before is for a track map in a video, not corner radius measurement (which was asked).
#2713
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,037
Received 4,355 Likes
on
2,479 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Keep in mind that driven radius generally varies through a corner. Typically, you're spiraling in to the apex (decreasing radius), then holding a constant or gradually increasing radius for most of the corner exit past apex until opening the wheel near the exit.
And of course the average radius driven is bigger than the radius through the centerline of the track (which isn't always constant either). If you want to factor in camber, the camber will transition into and out of corners, which further complicates things.
And of course the average radius driven is bigger than the radius through the centerline of the track (which isn't always constant either). If you want to factor in camber, the camber will transition into and out of corners, which further complicates things.
#2714
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I started reading this wonderful thread months ago, and Wow, now I'm finally at the end.
I have a question on line theory.
Let's say Driver A begins his line into a corner staying, say, 3 feet away from the outside of the track on turn in. He hits the apex and uses all the road on the exit.
Driver B turns into the corner using all the entry, and he also uses all the road on the exit, but he misses the apex by 3 feet.
Now, my understanding is that both drivers have reduced the radius of the corner an equal amount, and that therefore both of these compromised line would result in an equal maximum speed through the corner. Is this really correct? Is the effect on the radius the same?
If it is, then what I don't understand is why is just doesn't feel like it when you're driving. Not being exactly at the outside edge of the road on the entry just doesn't feel like it has as much of an affect on your speed through the corner. On the other hand, being able to cut the apex, such as by using all of the apex-marker curb or even hanging a wheel over the grass, really does feel like it allows you to carry more speed through the corner.
I have a question on line theory.
Let's say Driver A begins his line into a corner staying, say, 3 feet away from the outside of the track on turn in. He hits the apex and uses all the road on the exit.
Driver B turns into the corner using all the entry, and he also uses all the road on the exit, but he misses the apex by 3 feet.
Now, my understanding is that both drivers have reduced the radius of the corner an equal amount, and that therefore both of these compromised line would result in an equal maximum speed through the corner. Is this really correct? Is the effect on the radius the same?
If it is, then what I don't understand is why is just doesn't feel like it when you're driving. Not being exactly at the outside edge of the road on the entry just doesn't feel like it has as much of an affect on your speed through the corner. On the other hand, being able to cut the apex, such as by using all of the apex-marker curb or even hanging a wheel over the grass, really does feel like it allows you to carry more speed through the corner.
#2715
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 19,052
Received 3,192 Likes
on
1,841 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I started reading this wonderful thread months ago, and Wow, now I'm finally at the end.
I have a question on line theory.
Not being exactly at the outside edge of the road on the entry just doesn't feel like it has as much of an affect on your speed through the corner.
On the other hand, being able to cut the apex, such as by using all of the apex-marker curb or even hanging a wheel over the grass, really does feel like it allows you to carry more speed through the exit of the corner.
I have a question on line theory.
Not being exactly at the outside edge of the road on the entry just doesn't feel like it has as much of an affect on your speed through the corner.
On the other hand, being able to cut the apex, such as by using all of the apex-marker curb or even hanging a wheel over the grass, really does feel like it allows you to carry more speed through the exit of the corner.