Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

964 Cage Install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2011 | 10:15 PM
  #46  
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 2
From: Lexington, KY
Default

Originally Posted by winders
For side impact? Do you have the facts to back that up? I would love to see the data...
I doubt there is actual data. But just consider the geometry: most NASCAR bars have little to keep them from creasing and bending inward. On the other hand, the pyramid X distributes force outwards towards the four corners. This allows the front and main hoop sections of the cage to help out.

Again, I want what the Porsche factory welds into their cars (with carbon fiber doors). When a GT3 Cup comes over from Germany with NASCAR bars then maybe I'll change my mind.
Old 01-26-2011 | 11:00 PM
  #47  
winders's Avatar
winders
Race Car
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,604
Likes: 927
From: San Martin, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Astroman
I doubt there is actual data. But just consider the geometry: most NASCAR bars have little to keep them from creasing and bending inward. On the other hand, the pyramid X distributes force outwards towards the four corners. This allows the front and main hoop sections of the cage to help out.

Again, I want what the Porsche factory welds into their cars (with carbon fiber doors). When a GT3 Cup comes over from Germany with NASCAR bars then maybe I'll change my mind.
Porsche is not famous for looking out for the safety of their drivers so I would not hold up their cage design as a paragon of safety.

NASCAR, with their "rubbin' is racin'" attitude, have to build structures that will protect drivers from heavy cars and heavy collisions at greater speeds than what you normally see in sport car racing. There is a lot more energy in a typical NASCAR crash than a typical ALMS crash.

That "pyramid X" structure you are touting is too shallow to provide much force distribution and would likely cave in easily during a side impact of any consequence.

That's why I would like to see some numbers. I don't have any answers either but what I see from Porsche is not confidence inspiring for side impact protection.

Scott
Old 01-26-2011 | 11:34 PM
  #48  
Auto_Werks 3.6's Avatar
Auto_Werks 3.6
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 322
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

I would recommend that you take a second look at the belt routing on the pass side as well. If you don't have manufacturer's information to suggest your current routing, you should probably change it up.

Also, it looks like you are missing a required element if you plan on competing in SCCA events. See as follows:

2. One tube must extend, from each front down tube, forward
to the firewall or through the firewall except in vehicles in
Improved Touring, Showroom Stock, Spec Miata, and Touring.
This tube, one on each side, must connect to the chassis at a
point not more than 12 inches forward of the front axle centerline.
3. Cars competing in Improved Touring, Showroom Stock, Spec
Miata, and Touring may extend one tube, from each front
down tube, forward to the firewall, bulkhead or wheel well,
but not penetrating any panel.

Depending on how the rest of your car is configured you may be able to argue that you car is in Improved Touring "E", to get a regional Logbook as the element is optional for that category.

Or obviously, you may not be interested in SCCA's rules... Just thought it was worth mentioning.

Last edited by Auto_Werks 3.6; 07-10-2013 at 11:25 AM.
Old 01-28-2011 | 01:34 AM
  #49  
230ERACER's Avatar
230ERACER
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Thumbs up Pretty Pics

Danny Boy, those pics are soooo pretty, great job and I'm sure very safe, wish I was going down and playing with you guys, nice job to an already great GREEN race car, good luck. Glad to see they finally are starting to put E, F and G together, should be some great fun!
Old 01-28-2011 | 03:05 AM
  #50  
mooty's Avatar
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 43,566
Likes: 5,898
From: san francisco
Default

well since everyone is showing off..
Attached Images     
Old 01-28-2011 | 03:58 AM
  #51  
333pg333's Avatar
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 18,926
Likes: 99
From: Australia
Default

My cage builder is saying a similar thing re the X bars. His feeling is that people are turning away from this design and that they can cave with a perpendicular impact. fwiw.
Old 08-24-2011 | 07:33 PM
  #52  
Chris M.'s Avatar
Chris M.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 100
From: Prospect, KY
Default

What is the purpose of the holes in the door bar gussets?
Old 08-25-2011 | 06:32 AM
  #53  
stownsen914's Avatar
stownsen914
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 335
From: Ossining, NY
Default

Originally Posted by winders
Porsche is not famous for looking out for the safety of their drivers so I would not hold up their cage design as a paragon of safety.
I'm afraid I have to agree with winders on this one. Wasn't it Porsche that built magnesium framed 917s (one of which nearly killed Mark Donohue, before he actually died as a result of an F1 accident), and 935s with aluminum roll cages until they were outlawed?

Don't get me wrong - I'm a die hard Porsche fan - but just because Porsche does something doesn't mean it's the safest way to do it.



Quick Reply: 964 Cage Install



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:53 AM.