Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Sway Bars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2009, 09:07 PM
  #16  
analogmike
Rennlist Member
 
analogmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Danbury, CT, USA
Posts: 3,916
Received 103 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

I might have some used aftermarket sway bars too, I am moving and found a bunch of torsion bars (21 front, 27 and 29 rear) in my old garage but have not found the sways yet. Email me if you are looking for a deal.
Old 09-26-2009, 10:26 PM
  #17  
Chris M.
Rennlist Member
 
Chris M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Prospect, KY
Posts: 4,271
Received 100 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
Your front bar is full soft and rear set almost full stiff? On a 911?
My front is as soft as it can go, and if I could, I would make it softer. It still understeers like crazy in tight turns. That's what I'm saying; why would I get larger bars when I can't even use the full potential of the smaller bars I already have?
Old 09-26-2009, 10:34 PM
  #18  
Sean F
NASA Racer
Rennlist Member
 
Sean F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 4,778
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

might be a stupid question, but have you tried full stiff?
Old 09-26-2009, 10:51 PM
  #19  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,598
Received 290 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sean F
might be a stupid question, but have you tried full stiff?
Something sounds off to me too. How about disconnecting the front sway Chris, what does that do?
Old 09-27-2009, 02:46 PM
  #20  
dbryant61
Burning Brakes
 
dbryant61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vah Beach
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Chris,

From what I have read, the original 911 race cars did not even have a rear sway bar. As more and more people have raced and tested this platform, the consensus has become that bigger sway bars are needed to keep the body from rolling. This reduces the amount of camber lost under lateral G's. If you moved your rear sway bar to full tight, you would have to tighten your front one to maintain balance. Extrapolate that concept up several notches, and you end up with BF ARBs, nearly zero body roll, nearly zero camber loss, and a faster car through the corners. Again, you have to play with the settings to achieve your preferred balance.

I have my 22s up front at full stiff and rears at about 3/4 tight. I am guessing you hate understeer, and I don't like as much oversteer, even though my rear does come out quite often on acceleration out of a corner.
Old 09-27-2009, 05:35 PM
  #21  
Jay Gratton
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Jay Gratton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 6,567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by analogmike
I might have some used aftermarket sway bars too, I am moving and found a bunch of torsion bars (21 front, 27 and 29 rear) in my old garage but have not found the sways yet. Email me if you are looking for a deal.
Mike,
PM sent! Thanks. - Jay
Old 09-27-2009, 10:18 PM
  #22  
Tim
Racer
 
Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you guys talking about torsion bars? or sway bars.. op is asking about sway bars...
Old 09-27-2009, 10:38 PM
  #23  
Chris M.
Rennlist Member
 
Chris M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Prospect, KY
Posts: 4,271
Received 100 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Sean, Gary, Don, et al...

I have not tried tightening the front or disconnecting it. One problem may be not enough camber. I don't have camber plates, and have less than -2 in front, no monoballs and
-2.5 in back. NO LSD either, so I don't get the back end out much since I can't get on the power too quick. I've only done one race with the non-original suspension, and I was happy with my lap times considering. I will work it out eventually.

But does my logic still hold true? If you can't use a smaller bar at its tightest setting, you don't need larger bars?
Old 09-27-2009, 11:32 PM
  #24  
dbryant61
Burning Brakes
 
dbryant61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vah Beach
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Chris,

Your camber is a piece of critical missing info. I gave -3.0 up front and -2.4 in the rear. I got 3.0 by doing surgery. I have only raced in NASA GTS 2 and I know that what I did is not legal in D-class. I also know that many in D-class have -3.0 up front and -2.7 rear, or there-abouts. My guess is they got it with the Smart Racing camber king and possible off-set ball joints. Several got gigged for it last year at the Glen (rumor - I was not there). I have heard I can get -2.7 in the rear by going to mono-***** for the semi-trailing arm. That is next.

So, back to your situation, I would imagine you would have a very difficult time getting oversteer with over 1/2 degree more camber up front than rear. With that setup, your sway bar settings sound more feasible.
Old 09-27-2009, 11:35 PM
  #25  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,598
Received 290 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Makes sense, yes. I don't know what size SR sways we run off the top of my head, but our cars are all set up full soft in the rear and 1/2 to 3/4 soft in front. They are fairly large diameter bars...
Old 09-27-2009, 11:38 PM
  #26  
Chris M.
Rennlist Member
 
Chris M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Prospect, KY
Posts: 4,271
Received 100 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dbryant61
Chris,

Your camber is a piece of critical missing info. I gave -3.0 up front and -2.4 in the rear. I got 3.0 by doing surgery. I have only raced in NASA GTS 2 and I know that what I did is not legal in D-class. I also know that many in D-class have -3.0 up front and -2.7 rear, or there-abouts. My guess is they got it with the Smart Racing camber king and possible off-set ball joints. Several got gigged for it last year at the Glen (rumor - I was not there). I have heard I can get -2.7 in the rear by going to mono-***** for the semi-trailing arm. That is next.

So, back to your situation, I would imagine you would have a very difficult time getting oversteer with over 1/2 degree more camber up front than rear. With that setup, your sway bar settings sound more feasible.

-1.6 in the front, -2.6 in the rear, that's the most they could get. No "trickery", obviously.
Old 09-27-2009, 11:40 PM
  #27  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,598
Received 290 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dbryant61
Chris,

Your camber is a piece of critical missing info. I gave -3.0 up front and -2.4 in the rear. I got 3.0 by doing surgery. I have only raced in NASA GTS 2 and I know that what I did is not legal in D-class. I also know that many in D-class have -3.0 up front and -2.7 rear, or there-abouts. My guess is they got it with the Smart Racing camber king and possible off-set ball joints. Several got gigged for it last year at the Glen (rumor - I was not there).
Actually cars got bumped up a Class for bump steer kits and one 72 had SC flares. No mention of offset ball joints or any camber plates.
Old 09-27-2009, 11:41 PM
  #28  
PedroNole
Rennlist Member
 
PedroNole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Land of the Old People
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Chris-

Do you have coil over suspension (sway bars are only one piece of the puzzle)? Your camber definitely needs to be increased. How much toe are you running?

Unless you are on a completely green track or one with REALLY big decreasing radius corners, I can't see why you would need to be running your front bar full soft...

Last edited by PedroNole; 09-28-2009 at 12:32 AM.
Old 09-27-2009, 11:55 PM
  #29  
Chris M.
Rennlist Member
 
Chris M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Prospect, KY
Posts: 4,271
Received 100 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PedroNole
Chris-

Do you have coil over suspension (sway bars are only one piece of the puzzle)? Your camber definitely needs to be increased. How much toe are you running?

Unless you are on a completely green track or one with REALLY big decreasing radius corners, there's no way that you should be running your front bar full soft...
No coilovers, not allowed in stock classes.

23/33 torsion bars, 22/22 Weltmeister sways, custom valved Bilsteins, polygraphite bushings, aligned and corner-balanced. No monoballs, no camber plates, no decambered balljoints (legal?), no fancy bumpsteer kit (also illegal?). I do have the $13 steering rack spacer kit which is legal.

I think my toe is 1/16 IN, but I'd have to check to be sure. AFAIK, the only way to get more front camber is to go illegal...
Old 09-28-2009, 12:02 AM
  #30  
Bryan Watts
Drifting
 
Bryan Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris M.
-1.6 in the front, -2.6 in the rear, that's the most they could get. No "trickery", obviously.
With that little camber in the front, going stiffer on the front bars/springs may actually help with your understeer problem. Actually, I won't even say "may", I'll go ahead and guess that it WILL. You've got to manage the contact patch. If you have too much roll and not enough camber, your grip is going to suck. Going softer to solve the problem is only going to make it worse.

The "stiffer" = more understeer idea that you are taught is based on starting from a near optimal setup on a purpose built race car. You aren't anywhere close to that due to rules, budget, design, etc, etc. Stiffer does not always = less grip. If it did, we would go lower than the factory spring rates rather than much stiffer when going racing.


Quick Reply: Sway Bars



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:08 AM.