Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Modified 13/13

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2009, 11:53 AM
  #16  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Great to hear! I'm sure as we (theoretically) have club races again out here, it will make it easier to attract cars from the PRC series. Where, historically, there has been next to no contact.
Old 02-10-2009, 01:20 PM
  #17  
aeshultz
Burning Brakes
 
aeshultz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Columbus, OH, still back of the pack
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is great to hear. Thanks to the CR staff for trying this.
Old 02-10-2009, 02:03 PM
  #18  
NJcroc
Racer
 
NJcroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

THis seems to make so much sense and is a great step foward
Old 02-10-2009, 02:07 PM
  #19  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think the key is minor error, not minor damage.

I think that if you make a monumentally stupid mistake, or are blatantly wreckless, and luckily get away with minor damage, you should still be taken off the track.
Old 02-10-2009, 02:26 PM
  #20  
Bryan Watts
Drifting
 
Bryan Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PedroNole
So, for example, if you are cornering and make a slight over-correction that results in contact, the driver probably won't get a 13/13.
I assume you mean contact with a wall and not with another car?
Old 02-10-2009, 02:44 PM
  #21  
kurt M
Mr. Excitement
Rennlist Member
 
kurt M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fallschurch Va
Posts: 5,439
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LPM911
I agree. I never understood why you get punished twice for a single vehicle incident.

on the other side of the fence... while letting the occasional one car incident slide, what do you do about habitual offenders? Someone who frequently ends up off track with minor damage over the course of a weekend (or even over a few consecutive race weekends) is not driving with everyone's safety in mind.
This was the reasoning for the hit anything but the ground 13 as discribed to me. The idea was to keep you a bit better focused all the time. The downside was seeing it end a weekend when a car slid off and touched a tire in a sudden rain or dodged an on track mess only to smudge a tire wall and scratch the paint. Both were Sat a.m. 13s and weekend enders.
Old 02-10-2009, 04:57 PM
  #22  
LPM911
Rennlist Member
 
LPM911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: VA-DC-MD Area
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kurt M
This was the reasoning for the hit anything but the ground 13 as discribed to me. The idea was to keep you a bit better focused all the time. The downside was seeing it end a weekend when a car slid off and touched a tire in a sudden rain or dodged an on track mess only to smudge a tire wall and scratch the paint. Both were Sat a.m. 13s and weekend enders.
those examples are exactly why people, including myself, wanted to see this rule changed. but inevitably, someone will end with a 13 after a single car incident (or 2) because they were driving wildly and then get angry b/c of what the rule says. there's no perfect world.

keeping in mind, i'm in favor of this change but as i understand it, this rule is still in trial. moral of the story, if you have one of those lucky offs where there is only minor damage. check yourself and drive well within your limits the rest of the weekend. perhaps they'll modify the rule to be similar to doing too many spins in a DE and they send you home. 'x' number of single car incidents and you get that 13...
Old 02-10-2009, 08:23 PM
  #23  
Giacomo
Pro
 
Giacomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woodstock, ON
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The new rule makes a lot of sense. Although I have been fortunate that none of my off-track excursions resulted in any contact, in some cases coming to a stop inches from the tire wall or barrier, each incident could easily have resulted in a 13.

Now if we could only get them to let us remove carpet in the stock classes...
Old 02-10-2009, 08:29 PM
  #24  
PedroNole
Rennlist Member
 
PedroNole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Land of the Old People
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bryan Watts
I assume you mean contact with a wall and not with another car?
Yes, otherwise it wouldn't be "single car...."
Old 02-10-2009, 09:05 PM
  #25  
Jerseybean
GT3 Track Junkie
Rennlist Member
 
Jerseybean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey /Dallas and Mexico
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd like to see the rule grandfathered in to drivers from the last 6 months, I know of one person that cannot drive that really wants to drive with PCA but cannot because of a single car incident. PCA recently decided not to repeal his petition prior to sebring, which now seems unfair.
Old 02-11-2009, 10:42 AM
  #26  
LPM911
Rennlist Member
 
LPM911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: VA-DC-MD Area
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Giacomo
Now if we could only get them to let us remove carpet in the stock classes...
+1,000,000.... don't even get me started
Old 02-11-2009, 10:51 AM
  #27  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Ok, before anyone else says it - And camber plates...
Old 02-11-2009, 11:09 AM
  #28  
FredC
Drifting
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,052
Received 68 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

i am currently in probation for a single car incident at TRAC 08. Is the change retroactive?
Old 02-11-2009, 11:21 AM
  #29  
Jerseybean
GT3 Track Junkie
Rennlist Member
 
Jerseybean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey /Dallas and Mexico
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Good question!!!! I'd like to see PCA do the right thing and make it retroactive, I know a couple of great PCA racers with this issue.
Old 02-11-2009, 01:35 PM
  #30  
analogmike
Rennlist Member
 
analogmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Danbury, CT, USA
Posts: 3,912
Received 103 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Just to offer up a different view... if you are under control you should not have a single car incident. Other cars turn into us, or otherwise do weird things a lot, causing contact. But I don't remember having a tire wall jump out at me. My 13s were due to other cars doing unexpected things. FWIW

I do agree with the modification though.

Last edited by analogmike; 02-11-2009 at 04:10 PM.


Quick Reply: Modified 13/13



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:19 PM.