Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

944/924 VS 911.........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2008, 08:43 PM
  #1  
BostonDMD
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BostonDMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 7,030
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default 944/924 VS 911.........

What are the main differences in the style of racing them?
Is one easier to drive well than the other?
Old 09-18-2008, 08:51 PM
  #2  
ltc
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell

Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ltc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 29,323
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

9 pages easy.....
Old 09-18-2008, 09:17 PM
  #3  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The 924/944 is a budget racer, and very forgiving car to drive at the limit.

Comparable 911s are more expensive to get into, but are capable of faster lap times once driven properly.
Old 09-18-2008, 10:14 PM
  #4  
Jscaramella
Pro
 
Jscaramella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

One is cheaper to smash to bits...guess which

My S2; great car, easy to drive and cheap to race.

Now I want a 911 back (see below).
Old 09-18-2008, 10:25 PM
  #5  
Veloce Raptor
Team Owner
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,752
Received 1,539 Likes on 812 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ltc
9 pages easy.....
6.

Fatigue & wariness have set in.
Old 09-18-2008, 10:26 PM
  #6  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I learned to drive in a 911, then decided to run in a race series for the 944T. The first time I took it on the track was the first time I had driver a 944 of any kind - ever!

Inital impressions were that you could do things in the 944T that would have had you [OK, me] snake bit in a 911. Pitch it into corners, slide it, no problem. Much more neutrally balanced than I'd been used to with the 911.

That said, there's no question that the historical success of the 911 was due to the fact that you could put the front end of the car where you wanted, so long as you had the talent to manage the weight at the other end. The FEWC cars carry a lot more weight in front [doh!] and it takes a different driving style to manage that fact.

As for 'a is faster than b' claims, the basis for any such comparison is badly flawed. They are different cars, and its hard to find an truly equivalent pair on which to make that kind of comparison. And the 'cheaper racing' claim won't carry a lot of water either. I suspect that a well prepared F car capable of running at the front of the PCA CR field will cost about the same in the long run whether its a 994TS or a 911.

Last edited by APKhaos; 09-18-2008 at 11:34 PM.
Old 09-18-2008, 10:28 PM
  #7  
Veloce Raptor
Team Owner
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,752
Received 1,539 Likes on 812 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by APKhaos
As for 'a is faster than b' claims, the basis for any such comparison is badly flawed. They are different cars, and its hard to find an truly equivalent pair on which to make that kind of comparison.

+ Juan
Old 09-18-2008, 10:35 PM
  #8  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

As for 'a is faster than b' claims, the basis for any such comparison is badly flawed. They are different cars, and its hard to find an truly equivalent pair on which to make that kind of comparison.
In general, I think it would be hard for a 944 or 924 to come close to an equally prepped 911 of the same vintage. Turbos notwithstanding.
Old 09-18-2008, 10:41 PM
  #9  
2BWise
Three Wheelin'
 
2BWise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 1,311
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The 924/44 is going to have a lower polar moment of inertia due to the placement of the weight versus the 911, therefore, the 924/44 will drive more forgivable and be easier to correct versus a 911 at the same prep level. It is possible to tune a 911 to the point where the inertia will not be quite as noticable, but the 924/44 will always be the better starting point.
Otherwise I think the bigger issue is that the flat six is a far stronger motor. There is far more aftermarket support, but with the extra displacement it should have a better torque curve giving it an edge on the front engined cars.
Old 09-18-2008, 10:41 PM
  #10  
Jscaramella
Pro
 
Jscaramella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Rich
I've had plenty matched or better times than equal vintage 911's and I'm in a NA 944
Old 09-18-2008, 11:10 PM
  #11  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think the OP was talking about 2.5L's....
Old 09-18-2008, 11:13 PM
  #12  
Jimbo951
Racer
 
Jimbo951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2BWise
The 924/44 is going to have a lower polar moment of inertia due to the placement of the weight versus the 911
The 924/944's have a HIGHER moment of inertia. Moment of intertia is mass * R^2 where R is distance from the center of gravity. Since the 924/944's are well balanced (center of gravity is positioned near the center of car) and the engine & trans are at the ends of the car, then the R^2 factor is large.

Advantage for these cars they are less likely to spin (it takes a while to get the cars to rotate). Disadvantage is they'll take a little bit more work to get turning, thus APK's comment about "Pitching it into a corner".
Old 09-18-2008, 11:32 PM
  #13  
genikz
Three Wheelin'
 
genikz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have the '88 high-compression 2.5L and the car feels dog slow in the straights. The car is 2410#, minus driver. I'm about 150 lbs.

That being said, at the PCA Streets of Willow (Willow Springs Int'l Raceway) events, I can keep up with some of the older 911's down the straights and can usually catch them in the corners.

That's just a couple of them, however. Most of them are blindingly faster than me. They don't really seem to be out of shape as I'm following them either. Maybe they're really good, or maybe it's a combination of good setup and good driver.

I can't comment on driving a 911, but I really don't regret building my 924S into a track car. It only cost me $1100 for the car (it was somebodies daily driver) and I probably only have another $3000 into it. You can't touch a race-prepped 911 for that.
Old 09-18-2008, 11:45 PM
  #14  
2BWise
Three Wheelin'
 
2BWise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 1,311
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I'm pretty confident that the moment of inertia in the 911 will be higher. Yes, the 944 has the trans and engine split front and rear, but that should be the advantage. With the 911 having the engine and trans both at the rear that amount of mass at one location is going to have a significant effect on the moment of inertia when compared with the corresponding cg. If someone wants to provide the exact some cornering weighting specs for each car I'll go thru and calcuate the moments, but I'm confident that the 944 will be lower.
Old 09-18-2008, 11:56 PM
  #15  
A.Wayne
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
 
A.Wayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RPM Central
Posts: 20,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ltc
9 pages easy.....
LOL..... not if he decides on the 911 by page 3


Quick Reply: 944/924 VS 911.........



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:19 PM.