Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Racing suspension advice - 911SC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2007, 07:52 PM
  #46  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,583
Received 271 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

It comes down to the driver and all this comparison between 33 and 31mm, Wevo vs. SRP most likely means nothing. If someone can bring their (now) "D" Stock car to WGI (or any of the other tracks he destroyed the record) and beat Mike I.'s record in a Dan J. car i'll start thinking about my setup being off.. until then i'll go ahead and figure it's me that sucks..

Good LUCK!

Last edited by Gary R.; 11-23-2007 at 12:54 AM.
Old 11-23-2007, 12:11 AM
  #47  
rickdm
Racer
 
rickdm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

David, the adjustable Fox shocks sound great, but at $2800 vs. about $500 for the revalved Bilsteins I am not sure it is a good bang for the buck. I don't know any of the local guys running our cars who have the Fox shocks.
Old 11-23-2007, 12:56 AM
  #48  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,583
Received 271 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rickdm
David, the adjustable Fox shocks sound great, but at $2800 vs. about $500 for the revalved Bilsteins I am not sure it is a good bang for the buck. I don't know any of the local guys running our cars who have the Fox shocks.
Not legal in a "D Stock" car either way are they?
Old 11-23-2007, 09:39 AM
  #49  
David 23
Burning Brakes
 
David 23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rickdm
David, the adjustable Fox shocks sound great, but at $2800 vs. about $500 for the revalved Bilsteins I am not sure it is a good bang for the buck. I don't know any of the local guys running our cars who have the Fox shocks.
Rick,
I know, I just am trying to learn more about the various options, I'm not planning any changes, but you need shocks right?
Old 11-23-2007, 09:51 AM
  #50  
MarkM
Burning Brakes
 
MarkM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The rears are legal, unlewss I missed it in the new rules. They are only about 1000 for the pair I think.
Old 11-23-2007, 10:59 AM
  #51  
KRA993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
KRA993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
Not legal in a "D Stock" car either way are they?
Disclaimer: I am not an expert or PCA official anything.

I believe they are completely legal as long as you use them with your t-bars and....

New rule: 8. Add to stock class rules: “Non-stock factory shock housings with potentially adjustable spindle height are allowed if welded in the stock position and hub mounting matches factory dimensions”

But like you said earlier this stuff does not fix the drover.
Old 11-24-2007, 12:54 PM
  #52  
jakermc
Rennlist Member
 
jakermc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 2,032
Received 567 Likes on 252 Posts
Default

I found my alignment settings and thought I'd share in case anyone is interested.

My shocks were revalved by Bilstein to match 23/31 torsion bars. The rates are 240/130 for the front and 380/140 for the rear. I know SRP has a different formula but I do not know what it is.

I first had Buckley do my set-up in May 2005, this was before I added SRP sways. I then had Mayo's put their spin on things when the sways, cage, ballast, and other mods were finished to prepare for NASA GTS-3. This was Jan 2007. Both sheets are attached.
Attached Images   



Quick Reply: Racing suspension advice - 911SC



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:08 AM.