Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PCA Club Racing Rules Changes posted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2006, 03:13 PM
  #1  
Steward B.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Steward B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minnetonka, MN
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default PCA Club Racing Rules Changes posted

The 2007 changes to the PCA club racing rules have been posted at:

http://www.pca.org/clubrace/docs/forms.htm
Old 11-03-2006, 03:28 PM
  #2  
George A
Three Wheelin'
 
George A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Crap, I just had some work on my tranny and didn't do the RS flywheel (I was being honest). It's legal now. I wonder who brought that up. Looks like it's time to go back into tranny........

G.
Old 11-03-2006, 03:40 PM
  #3  
Jarez Mifkin
Three Wheelin'
 
Jarez Mifkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mount Juliet, TN
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Did adding the weights of the stock classes to include driver weights really change anything? Now I need to cut 15 lbs off of my ballast......
Old 11-03-2006, 03:44 PM
  #4  
Greg Fishman
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Greg Fishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 7,254
Received 33 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmorris3
Did adding the weights of the stock classes to include driver weights really change anything? Now I need to cut 15 lbs off of my ballast......
I don't think it really makes a difference unless you weigh much more than 150lbs.

It would have been nice if the minimum weights had been dropped by the 150lbs or make the minimum weights listed include driver.
Old 11-03-2006, 03:44 PM
  #5  
BluemaxxRacing
Racer
 
BluemaxxRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tequesta, FL & Park City, UT
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

DAMN is right!! I was REALLY hoping for the 3.4 liter 996s to move to D where they belong. DAMN!
Old 11-03-2006, 03:51 PM
  #6  
chrisp
Three Wheelin'
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow I never thought the day would come that driver weight is included. Whether the rule makes sense or not aside the only shortcoming I think is that they chose a really low weight. They should have chosen something closer to the average PCA driver weight which from what I've seen walking around the paddock is 175 lbs or so.
Old 11-03-2006, 03:57 PM
  #7  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I don't understand the tow hook issue. At or above the bumper. Does this mean that factory tow hooks in 911s which are attached to the engine case are no longer legal? What about the front? This is the one that makes little sense to me.
Old 11-03-2006, 03:59 PM
  #8  
Mike Buck
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Mike Buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Churchville, MD
Posts: 2,131
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Wow, the weight thing got approved. More donuts for everyone!! Everyone likes donuts and now it matters not how many you eat!

Irrelevant to me, I have an SP3 car which includes driver weight even before this rule.
Old 11-03-2006, 04:02 PM
  #9  
Greg Fishman
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Greg Fishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 7,254
Received 33 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrisp
Wow I never thought the day would come that driver weight is included. Whether the rule makes sense or not aside the only shortcoming I think is that they chose a really low weight. They should have chosen something closer to the average PCA driver weight which from what I've seen walking around the paddock is 175 lbs or so.

I don't see how having a set weight for the driver without changing the weight of the vehicle does anything, higher or lower.
Am I missing something here?
Old 11-03-2006, 04:03 PM
  #10  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Woo Hoo! I can take 80 lbs out of my car!

These changes do change the landscape of C class somewhat. Looks like the 964RS 3.8L is the big dog now, especially now that the 996 X51s are gone.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car

CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.

Old 11-03-2006, 04:07 PM
  #11  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

"Looks like the 964RS 3.8L is the big dog now"

Not like you'll find one of these to race. They were effectively a street legal 964RSR available in Europe with a very few number produced.
Old 11-03-2006, 04:18 PM
  #12  
chrisp
Three Wheelin'
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Greg, just that the further the number is below average the faster the cars get on average 06 vs 07 and I would have expected them to get the light guys to add ballast instead of the heavy guys to remove ballast.
Old 11-03-2006, 04:43 PM
  #13  
Rick
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 3,018
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geoffrey
I don't understand the tow hook issue. At or above the bumper. Does this mean that factory tow hooks in 911s which are attached to the engine case are no longer legal? What about the front? This is the one that makes little sense to me.
This one has me a pit perplexed as well - especially since I just put on an improved rear hook that sits a bit lower than the bumper.

Well..I'm off to the donut shop...getting ready for next year.
Old 11-03-2006, 04:46 PM
  #14  
JimB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
JimB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Herman
Woo Hoo! I can take 80 lbs out of my car!

These changes do change the landscape of C class somewhat. Looks like the 964RS 3.8L is the big dog now, especially now that the 996 X51s are gone.
Yea I'm glad that C is back to being the class where the only way to win the big races is to import a very rare limitied edition european car. Makes perfect sense to me. Why would you want to let the 996 be competitive? There's only about 100,000 of them out there waiting to become club racers.
Old 11-03-2006, 05:09 PM
  #15  
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 23,303
Received 499 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Wow, lots of changes for me which means I can dump the sixty lbs of ballast to meet the lowered 3020lb weight of the car, as opposed to the previous 3064lbs, add the aftermarket LSD, add the RS flywheel and clutch and be forced to wear a balaclava to cover my hippie hair.


Quick Reply: PCA Club Racing Rules Changes posted



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:38 AM.