PCA Club Racing Rules/weigh cars with driver
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minnetonka, MN
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PCA Club Racing Rules/weigh cars with driver
For the sake of discussion, let's hypothetically assume that PCA Club Racing decides to adopt the current rules proposal that would increase the listed weight of a stock class car by 200 lbs, with cars to be weighed with drivers.
The topic I want to throw out is:
"Is 200 lbs the correct number?"
Should it rather be 150 lbs so that light drivers don't have to add ballast?
Or should it be 180 lbs, which I believe is the number used by SCCA?
Or 250 lbs? Or what number?
The topic I want to throw out is:
"Is 200 lbs the correct number?"
Should it rather be 150 lbs so that light drivers don't have to add ballast?
Or should it be 180 lbs, which I believe is the number used by SCCA?
Or 250 lbs? Or what number?
#3
http://pediatrics.about.com/cs/growt...vg_wt_male.htm
Looks like it needs to be 190 lbs so might as well make it 180 so we can get some complimentary overlap with SCCA.
Best regards,
Looks like it needs to be 190 lbs so might as well make it 180 so we can get some complimentary overlap with SCCA.
Best regards,
#4
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Yeah, let's make it 150 lbs. I'll take back my 80 lb disadvantage to you jockeys.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
#5
Race Director
I think 200lbs is way too much. 180lbs is better sine it matches with SCCA. Also Why make the ligher folks ADD wegiht. I rather see the big guys LOSE weight (either themselves or in the car).
Bottomline is the lighter 150lbs guys will NOT want to add 50bls of ballast (for 200lbs, heck 30 is bad enough), but if you weigh 230lbs you get take out alot of weight you would rather pull 50lbs than just 30lbs.
Bottomline is the lighter 150lbs guys will NOT want to add 50bls of ballast (for 200lbs, heck 30 is bad enough), but if you weigh 230lbs you get take out alot of weight you would rather pull 50lbs than just 30lbs.
#6
Nordschleife Master
I don't think that using the average male weight is a good idea, as this is a co-ed series. My opinion is that it needs to be low enough that nearly no one has to add additional ballast. 150lbs would accomplish this. I have no issues if the larger folks get to remove some ballast.
Trending Topics
#8
The last time PCA looked at weight, it was 150. Has the average driver gotten that "phat" to now be 200?....
One reason people leave PCA is that the stock/prepared classes are so heavy, while GT is "anything goes." Huge divide.
Certainly not a way to make the stock drivers comfortable, by asking for another 50 pounds...
BTW, I don't weigh the 90 that is frequently reported but let's not talk about it; my competitors all make up for the weight difference with me, I promise.
PM#26
1988 944
One reason people leave PCA is that the stock/prepared classes are so heavy, while GT is "anything goes." Huge divide.
Certainly not a way to make the stock drivers comfortable, by asking for another 50 pounds...
BTW, I don't weigh the 90 that is frequently reported but let's not talk about it; my competitors all make up for the weight difference with me, I promise.
PM#26
1988 944
#12
Maybe PCA put the weight high, so it would get turned down?
Also, with all the enduros, strategy:
1. Is the last driver or the 'owner' weighed? Either of you choice? (Find a "phat" co-driver?)
Many of us skip refueling with slow hoses and high gas fill. Gosh, now that's heavy.
2. Some guys sweat out 20 pds....I also know some of us our weight goes up and down, too....
Because cutting it close, but that's what racers do.
PM
#26
Also, with all the enduros, strategy:
1. Is the last driver or the 'owner' weighed? Either of you choice? (Find a "phat" co-driver?)
Many of us skip refueling with slow hoses and high gas fill. Gosh, now that's heavy.
2. Some guys sweat out 20 pds....I also know some of us our weight goes up and down, too....
Because cutting it close, but that's what racers do.
PM
#26
#13
Originally Posted by esscape26
The last time PCA looked at weight, it was 150. Has the average driver gotten that "phat" to now be 200?....
One reason people leave PCA is that the stock/prepared classes are so heavy, while GT is "anything goes." Huge divide.
Certainly not a way to make the stock drivers comfortable, by asking for another 50 pounds...
BTW, I don't weigh the 90 that is frequently reported but let's not talk about it; my competitors all make up for the weight difference with me, I promise.
PM#26
1988 944
One reason people leave PCA is that the stock/prepared classes are so heavy, while GT is "anything goes." Huge divide.
Certainly not a way to make the stock drivers comfortable, by asking for another 50 pounds...
BTW, I don't weigh the 90 that is frequently reported but let's not talk about it; my competitors all make up for the weight difference with me, I promise.
PM#26
1988 944
Just asking, but does anyone really want to race a truly "stock" car. Does anyone drive their Club race car daily anymore? Everyone wants their car to be lighter and handle better and accelerate faster. There's really very little that's "stock" about most folks suspension in the "stock" classes. If the purpose of stock classes is to control costs (I assume it is) and nobody likes to push a tank around a track why not lobby for a stripped "stock" car. Isn't that kinda what the 944 spec series and such have? It's not like we don't know what any of these cars weigh with various deletions. Pick a sensible set of deletions and that forms the basis for the hp/weight formula (with driver). It is a chasm to leap across to GT currently.
#14
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Russ Murphy
Just asking, but does anyone really want to race a truly "stock" car. Does anyone drive their Club race car daily anymore? Everyone wants their car to be lighter and handle better and accelerate faster. There's really very little that's "stock" about most folks suspension in the "stock" classes. If the purpose of stock classes is to control costs (I assume it is) and nobody likes to push a tank around a track why not lobby for a stripped "stock" car. Isn't that kinda what the 944 spec series and such have? It's not like we don't know what any of these cars weigh with various deletions. Pick a sensible set of deletions and that forms the basis for the hp/weight formula (with driver). It is a chasm to leap across to GT currently.
#15
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Russ,
I actually race in stock class with my daily driver. I am far from competitive in my class and without making some significant changes my car is already 50# over weight. Add that with my larger than average size 6'2" and 225lbs I will be at a serious disadvantage. I'm all for including drivers weight, but let's make it reasonable for a stock car (really stock) to get down to that weight with an average sized person (190#).
Which ever way things go I'm not a big complainer, so let's just see how it goes.
-Skip
I actually race in stock class with my daily driver. I am far from competitive in my class and without making some significant changes my car is already 50# over weight. Add that with my larger than average size 6'2" and 225lbs I will be at a serious disadvantage. I'm all for including drivers weight, but let's make it reasonable for a stock car (really stock) to get down to that weight with an average sized person (190#).
Which ever way things go I'm not a big complainer, so let's just see how it goes.
-Skip