GT3 Cup Dyno Results - need feedback
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
GT3 Cup Dyno Results - need feedback
Hello to everyone. I have a 2000 Cup Car which posted the following results on a DynoJet post rebuild in late 2005.
Would simply like some comments about where you think these numbers are versus other 2000 and also 2004-05 cars?
RWPH: 331
TQ: 254
Dyno sheet attached
Would simply like some comments about where you think these numbers are versus other 2000 and also 2004-05 cars?
RWPH: 331
TQ: 254
Dyno sheet attached
Last edited by RSRRacer; 12-06-2012 at 07:43 AM.
#4
Nordschleife Master
Originally Posted by bill walczak
Close to normal for 2000-2002 using the 15% rule. Looks like a momentum car to me ;->
#7
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Seems low, but you cannot compare dyno to dyno. My GT3 pulled 387 rwhp on a Mustang dyno, and even at 10% high it still is monsterous. It would run with any cup car down any straight. If you can run with other cup cars down the straight, then it is probably around 345~350 rwhp..
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
Trending Topics
#8
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by RSRRacer
I have a 2000 Cup Car which posted the following results on a DynoJet post rebuild in late 2005.
#9
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by bill walczak
Chris, Our motors are very close in output. My output is 407 and yours is 390ish.
#10
Nordschleife Master
Bill, both dyno graphs are RWHP, so you are about 70hp more than the cup car. You need to compare your 407 with his 331 even though Rick's Dynapack says "Flywheel HP". Your car was run without any drivetrain loss factor, so it treats RWHP as FWHP.
It has been my experience that a Dynojet 248C will read higher than a Dynapack, or Dyno Dynamics. Mustang dynos are user calibrated so they are all over the place. I have never really liked the Mustangs and there is a wide range of outputs I've seen from dyno to dyno due to the calibration.
Another 2000 cup car with roughly 85 hours produced 335rwhp on a Dynapack dyno as a comparison. It has been my experience that if you tested the same car on a Dynojet 248C it would have read higher by 10-20hp.
It has been my experience that a Dynojet 248C will read higher than a Dynapack, or Dyno Dynamics. Mustang dynos are user calibrated so they are all over the place. I have never really liked the Mustangs and there is a wide range of outputs I've seen from dyno to dyno due to the calibration.
Another 2000 cup car with roughly 85 hours produced 335rwhp on a Dynapack dyno as a comparison. It has been my experience that if you tested the same car on a Dynojet 248C it would have read higher by 10-20hp.
#13
Rennlist Member
Nope, a grocery getter