Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why are numbers for racing LOWER??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2024, 10:19 AM
  #61  
Carrera51
Rennlist Member
 
Carrera51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Keswick, VA
Posts: 3,978
Received 243 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

Totally agree with those who suggested that every PCA Race have an Advanced DE group as part of the event. Would also be nice if there could be time for a classroom session Q&A on making the transition from DE to Club Racing. I would like to see PCA Club Racing management work with all the racers on brainstorming to figure out a way to reverse the seemingly declining attendance at races. As others have said, it's not a good sign when Sebring attendance has been on the decline and we can sell out a VIR race in the spring. And lastly, all of us PCA racers need to do a better job of playing the roll of marketing guys and talk up the program. We all need to be more like Jas0nn and do what we can to bring new racers into the program.
Old 04-02-2024, 10:22 AM
  #62  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 19,121
Received 3,303 Likes on 1,877 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RobT 394
Interesting and important read. Several strong hypotheses in the thread that need to be investigated and taken seriously if one cares enough to turn this situation around:
  1. There is a market for DEs and W2W racing, unclear if it is growing. The typical Porsche buyer and hence Porsche motorsport market is aging. Something the brand itself has been trying to address.
  2. Competition is increasing. Many more DE and W2W options.
  3. Customer needs are not being met. Racers have and will continue to defect to other venues if they do not like the product.
  4. Very little is done to improve the product and its promotion. There is a lot of variation across events and classes.
  5. Suppliers feel the pain as well. At some point it is not worth their effort to show up and support the race. Especially tire companies that send equipment and people.
  6. The shops that support us also feel the pain. The fragmentation does not help their economics.
The sad truth is no one seems to care at the national level. I for one have offered to volunteer time to help figure this out but there are no takers. IMHO it will take a lot of change which pushes uphill against historical norms. At the top of that list is a a strong central team that can build an inviting culture at every event and provide consistency across regions and events.
On the money. As usual…

The sport, both the competitive sector and the recreational/educational sector, IS growing, I can assure you.

The “aging out” argument has been a perennial concern for the last couple decades. First in vintage, now in SCCA, PCA Club Racing and some others, yet here we are with more licensed racers across the board, more organizations and more events across the country and around the world. Many more DE participants than ever.

We had eight NA and ND Miata drivers under 35 at this past weekend’s VDCA event at VIR, another 170 car race entry, plus the additional 100 BMW Club Racing brought to share the track time.

I remember when SCCA was “secret car club of America,” not just “spoiled children crashing automobiles.” It still is. As is PCA Club Racing. Under the radar, despite all the mother club’s support.

First PCA Club Race I ever went to, after thirty years in the industry, was Sebring 2010. Unbelievable! Went over the bridge and there were seventy, factory-built cars (Cup cars, GT3 cars, Fabcar) on the grid. NEVER KNEW PCA CR existed other than basically 911CUP cars, before then. Had only seen a few crossovers from PCA CR in historic races over the years, and of course raced with Alan Friedman since the late Eighties.

PCA CR is definitely an organization that is “stuck.”
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway






















The following users liked this post:
M13S (04-15-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 11:08 AM
  #63  
Matt Romanowski
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Matt Romanowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 12,664
Received 990 Likes on 594 Posts
Default

IMHO, knowing the people, organizations, and having been part of a few of them in different ways, it's a very segmented and diverse problem. The sport is growing, but that area of growth is constantly moving. Head to a Gridlife event and you will see a lot of race cars, just not Porsches. The same goes for many track day organizations - they get a ton of different drivers, but they are not PCA members even when they have Porsches.

I would also say that the consolidation in the motorsports safety, manufacturing, track days, and other areas has not been good for the overall industry. The numbers people quote are marketing numbers, not real numbers.

What to do with PCA and Club Racing? Well......I would say that it has to start with efforts like Jason and 911CUP are making (it's way cool) and you'll have to figure out how to change the national organization. They have transitioned from being a club to a business over the last 15-20 years and there are downfalls to that.
The following users liked this post:
tgsmith4845 (04-03-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 11:23 AM
  #64  
RobT 394
Rennlist Member
 
RobT 394's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Smokies
Posts: 733
Received 108 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

As a 911CUP driver I truly appreciate JasOn and all he is doing. But the advocates cannot do it all on their own. National needs to step up. They need to involve PMNA and get better support from the brand. And they need to run it as a business, a customer service business. One where the experience matters.

The difference between running a Porsche Racecar and a Mazda is stark at the club level. PMNA has the know how and good people to help. But you have to engage them at the club level.

Last edited by RobT 394; 04-02-2024 at 12:29 PM.
The following users liked this post:
tgsmith4845 (04-03-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 11:24 AM
  #65  
LuigiVampa
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
 
LuigiVampa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: PCA Gulag
Posts: 14,968
Received 4,391 Likes on 1,927 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
PCA CR is definitely an organization that is “stuck.”
So true, and yet they are barely waking up to the problem.

Originally Posted by Matt Romanowski
What to do with PCA and Club Racing? Well......I would say that it has to start with efforts like Jason and 911CUP are making (it's way cool) and you'll have to figure out how to change the national organization. They have transitioned from being a club to a business over the last 15-20 years and there are downfalls to that.
Bingo - I feel like PCA has forgotten that it is a CLUB and we are MEMBERS and a lot of times decisions are made without any input. While the vast majority of PCA volunteers are here for the right reason, there are a few who are on power trips and don't have the right spirit. This is supposed to be fun!

Originally Posted by RobT 394
Interesting and important read. Several strong hypotheses in the thread that need to be investigated and taken seriously if one cares enough to turn this situation around:
  1. There is a market for DEs and W2W racing, unclear if it is growing. The typical Porsche buyer and hence Porsche motorsport market is aging. Something the brand itself has been trying to address.
  2. Competition is increasing. Many more DE and W2W options.
  3. Customer needs are not being met. Racers have and will continue to defect to other venues if they do not like the product.
  4. Very little is done to improve the product and its promotion. There is a lot of variation across events and classes.
  5. Suppliers feel the pain as well. At some point it is not worth their effort to show up and support the race. Especially tire companies that send equipment and people.
  6. The shops that support us also feel the pain. The fragmentation does not help their economics.
The sad truth is no one seems to care at the national level. I for one have offered to volunteer time to help figure this out but there are no takers. IMHO it will take a lot of change which pushes uphill against historical norms. At the top of that list is a a strong central team that can build an inviting culture at every event and provide consistency across regions and events.
The only thing that has happened in my ten years of club racing is the expansion of classes.

PCA leadership should go to other series events like IGT, AER, Champ, WRL, etc. and see why people are leaving PCA.

Last edited by LuigiVampa; 04-02-2024 at 11:26 AM.
The following 4 users liked this post by LuigiVampa:
erliuic (04-02-2024), Matt Romanowski (04-02-2024), mlct (04-02-2024), tgsmith4845 (04-03-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 11:42 AM
  #66  
skeeler
Instructor
 
skeeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 233
Received 38 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LuigiVampa
So true, and yet they are barely waking up to the problem.



Bingo - I feel like PCA has forgotten that it is a CLUB and we are MEMBERS and a lot of times decisions are made without any input. While the vast majority of PCA volunteers are here for the right reason, there are a few who are on power trips and don't have the right spirit. This is supposed to be fun!



The only thing that has happened in my ten years of club racing is the expansion of classes.

PCA leadership should go to other series events like IGT, AER, Champ, WRL, etc. and see why people are leaving PCA.

^^^^^^^^ This........
The following users liked this post:
tgsmith4845 (04-03-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 12:07 PM
  #67  
lcrain
Rennlist Member
 
lcrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 380
Received 78 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

I am surprised to not see SIM racing mentioned. I have to assume that many car enthusiasts are simply getting their kicks in that environment.

As someone who came up through the ranks in PCA to be an instructor, I have only really considered SPB due to cost and field size. I haven't pulled the trigger because costs are still pretty high to race a remotely full calendar due to travel. I race with NASA, champcar, WRL and Gridlife occasionally.

Gridlife is the most fun I have had sprint racing because the field is reliably large and competitive. I attribute a lot of that to their marketing strategy and single class racing. All the cars are built to one racing class. So if you want to race with gridlife, you build to a single rule set. They also have time trials, hpde, drifting and a music festival like vibe that really attracts the younger generations. Even if they can't afford to be on track they can justify being around the scene they are passionate about. I am probably smack in the middle of the age range for GLTC racers (36) and most of us are not there for the dubstep concert after the racing is over. But it is a great way to get younger people exposed to the format.

I think NASA is in big trouble personally because they have way too many classes. The biggest field by far is SM and most guys who came up in DE don't drive Miatas nor do they want to. They want to drive their corvette or whatever and they may have very few other cars in that class (at least in the Texas region). It's such a bummer to spend a few grand to show up to a race weekend and race against the same 3-5 guys every time.

Champcar and WRL are really attractive to me because I can rent a seat for <$5k in a GP2ish car, get 4+ hours of seat time, do it with my friends and go to tracks I otherwise could not justify going to due to the massive travel time associated with hauling across the country. Fly in, race at an awesome track, rent a cheap hotel room with a buddy and fly out at the end of the weekend. WRL has become very competitive with the GTO field drawing the biggest numbers and those seats are very pricey but still probably competitive vs. driving a gt4 car in PCA and you get more seat time.

At the end of the day, most people have budget constraints and the options to deploy that budget are growing. I am at a point in my racing where I care mostly about hanging out with my friends and racing in a larger field so I always have competition. WRL/Champcar are the best use of my funds currently to check those boxes.
The following 2 users liked this post by lcrain:
Matt Romanowski (04-02-2024), ProCoach (04-02-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 12:30 PM
  #68  
Matt Romanowski
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Matt Romanowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 12,664
Received 990 Likes on 594 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LuigiVampa
Bingo - I feel like PCA has forgotten that it is a CLUB and we are MEMBERS and a lot of times decisions are made without any input. While the vast majority of PCA volunteers are here for the right reason, there are a few who are on power trips and don't have the right spirit. This is supposed to be fun!
PCA has over 21 paid employees. It is a business and run like one.
Old 04-02-2024, 12:42 PM
  #69  
RobT 394
Rennlist Member
 
RobT 394's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Smokies
Posts: 733
Received 108 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Fixed it for you:

PCA has over 21 paid employees. It is a business and should be run like one.
The following users liked this post:
Veloce Raptor (04-02-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 01:56 PM
  #70  
stownsen914
Three Wheelin'
 
stownsen914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 1,836
Received 326 Likes on 198 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jas0nn
PCA has a terrific potential feeder system - but there's no real connection/path between DE and Club Racing. In my opinion, there should be an advanced DE at EVERY race - and we should actively try to make connection between a those Advanced drivers and Racers (think "mentors"). Make them a part of the show; make them feel like they belong here! And offer a half step toward racing in the form of Time Trials. Get them hooked through an option that doesn't require as big a commitment as a log booked race car!
Saw a few other comments to this effect as well in the thread. I agree it would be great, and clearly effective as a bridge to racing. I wonder if PCA has their hands somewhat tied on this though, for insurance reasons. I'm pretty sure that for every PCA DE I attend, it's either written or spoken something like "PCA DE is not racing, nor is it practice for racing." I wonder if they HAVE to say that to keep their insurance. And similarly, may be prevented from making a more direct link between the two activities.
Old 04-02-2024, 02:16 PM
  #71  
dgrobs
Rennlist Member
 
dgrobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: The Swamps of Jersey/WGI/VIR...
Posts: 6,677
Received 1,809 Likes on 1,204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stownsen914
Saw a few other comments to this effect as well in the thread. I agree it would be great, and clearly effective as a bridge to racing. I wonder if PCA has their hands somewhat tied on this though, for insurance reasons. I'm pretty sure that for every PCA DE I attend, it's either written or spoken something like "PCA DE is not racing, nor is it practice for racing." I wonder if they HAVE to say that to keep their insurance. And similarly, may be prevented from making a more direct link between the two activities.
LTL can comment on this....

(LTL = Luigi the Lawyer)
The following users liked this post:
LuigiVampa (04-02-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 02:22 PM
  #72  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 19,121
Received 3,303 Likes on 1,877 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stownsen914
Saw a few other comments to this effect as well in the thread. I agree it would be great, and clearly effective as a bridge to racing. I wonder if PCA has their hands somewhat tied on this though, for insurance reasons. I'm pretty sure that for every PCA DE I attend, it's either written or spoken something like "PCA DE is not racing, nor is it practice for racing." I wonder if they HAVE to say that to keep their insurance. And similarly, may be prevented from making a more direct link between the two activities.
BMWCCA doesn't have to say that. Lime Rock Drivers Club, AMP, Monticello, MSR have drivers ed and intramural racing without a self imposed barrier between their DE and racing programs.

There needs to be (and can be) better coordination at the PCA National level between DE and Club Racing, for sure.

Heck, when SCCA saw their club racing numbers decline, they started to copy NASA's HyperDrives (short, instructed 20 minute sessions for stone stock novices) and instituted a Time Trials program and the total numbers went back up to what they were some time ago.
The following 2 users liked this post by ProCoach:
Carrera51 (04-02-2024), LuigiVampa (04-02-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 02:29 PM
  #73  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 19,121
Received 3,303 Likes on 1,877 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LuigiVampa
So true, and yet they are barely waking up to the problem.

Bingo - I feel like PCA has forgotten that it is a CLUB and we are MEMBERS and a lot of times decisions are made without any input.

While the vast majority of PCA volunteers are here for the right reason, there are a few who are on power trips and don't have the right spirit. This is supposed to be fun!

PCA leadership should go to other series events like IGT, AER, Champ, WRL, etc. and see why people are leaving PCA.
I think you answered the question they need to ask.

I'll only add that I have NEVER seen more contact in a club racing series, over the last fifteen years, as I continue to observe in PCA Club Racing.

Yes, this is my subjective assessment, but since the beginning of my involvement with a significant number of PCA Club racers across the widest variety of classes, the difference is stark.

Shocked, SHOCKED at the disconnect between what those leading some of the Rookie meetings I've attended and what is actually happening out on track. "There is NO contact," "We run a non-contact series," "PCA has the lowest incident rate of any racing organization," it just goes on and on...

Single-car, multi-car, "oh, HIM again," it doesn't matter.

THAT has to get fixed first, IMO.

Last edited by ProCoach; 04-02-2024 at 02:30 PM.
The following 5 users liked this post by ProCoach:
analogmike (04-02-2024), Carrera51 (04-02-2024), LuigiVampa (04-02-2024), tgsmith4845 (04-03-2024), Veloce Raptor (04-02-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 02:47 PM
  #74  
LuigiVampa
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
 
LuigiVampa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: PCA Gulag
Posts: 14,968
Received 4,391 Likes on 1,927 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stownsen914
Saw a few other comments to this effect as well in the thread. I agree it would be great, and clearly effective as a bridge to racing. I wonder if PCA has their hands somewhat tied on this though, for insurance reasons. I'm pretty sure that for every PCA DE I attend, it's either written or spoken something like "PCA DE is not racing, nor is it practice for racing." I wonder if they HAVE to say that to keep their insurance. And similarly, may be prevented from making a more direct link between the two activities.
Originally Posted by ProCoach
BMWCCA doesn't have to say that. Lime Rock Drivers Club, AMP, Monticello, MSR have drivers ed and intramural racing without a self imposed barrier between their DE and racing programs.

There needs to be (and can be) better coordination at the PCA National level between DE and Club Racing, for sure.

Heck, when SCCA saw their club racing numbers decline, they started to copy NASA's HyperDrives (short, instructed 20 minute sessions for stone stock novices) and instituted a Time Trials program and the total numbers went back up to what they were some time ago.
PCA is overly proud of their low insurance rate, but the compromise is that they are much more restrictive. PCA regions are not allowed to hold karting events. We are not allowed to do "taste of the track" anymore. They are obsessed over non-PCA members attending PCA events. I know we are a member organization but how can we attract new members if you have to be a member to see what membership is about?

I really don't have a problem with PCA saying DE isn't racing because you don't want a few yahoo newbie DE drivers to start doing stupid things out on track. That being said, there is absolutely no promotion or even a mention of racing during a DE program. I want to say that the DE programs tend to run from benign to almost anti-racing. We teach the DE line to keep drivers safe - not the race line.

This thread is more focused on racing but PCA also has a DE problem as those numbers are way down as well. DMTD charges more than anyone else and gets filled up. Why?

Lastly, as someone else pointed out, Porsche doesn't do $hit for PCA. Instead of supporting PCA they created the Sprint Challenge, which is a direct competitor. It is crazy that we spend millions on these machines and we are all treated like red-headed step children. Porsche doesn't care.

Last edited by LuigiVampa; 04-02-2024 at 02:49 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by LuigiVampa:
9114609048 (04-02-2024), mlct (04-02-2024), tgsmith4845 (04-03-2024)
Old 04-02-2024, 03:31 PM
  #75  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: All Ate Up With Motor
Posts: 41,854
Received 1,680 Likes on 868 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach

I'll only add that I have NEVER seen more contact in a club racing series, over the last fifteen years, as I continue to observe in PCA Club Racing.

Yes, this is my subjective assessment, but since the beginning of my involvement with a significant number of PCA Club racers across the widest variety of classes, the difference is stark.

Shocked, SHOCKED at the disconnect between what those leading some of the Rookie meetings I've attended and what is actually happening out on track. "There is NO contact," "We run a non-contact series," "PCA has the lowest incident rate of any racing organization," it just goes on and on...

Single-car, multi-car, "oh, HIM again," it doesn't matter.

THAT has to get fixed first, IMO.
THIS x 100000000000
The following users liked this post:
tgsmith4845 (04-03-2024)


Quick Reply: Why are numbers for racing LOWER??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:55 AM.