HPDE insurance
#91
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: The Swamps of Jersey/WGI/VIR...
Posts: 6,216
Received 1,445 Likes
on
1,002 Posts
. I called USAA to get a quote for a GT4 I was interested in. The first question the agent/representative asked me was “are you going to track the car (GT4)? I said “I didn’t know but if I did, I would get track insurance”. He said “if you track your GT4, we can’t insure you”. I questioned him, and he confirmed, that USAA would cancel our auto policies if I tracked a GT4! He then asked if I tracked my Cayman S, to which I replied “no”. This is crazy. I don’t know what to do but I also can’t switch insurers easily, we have home owner insurance, a farm insured, and an umbrella policy with them. So be forewarned.
The following users liked this post:
Deadeye (08-02-2019)
#92
I have yet to read a situation that really justifies track insurance.
if my car was under $30k I wouldn’t bother. I’d risk it and if $30k was all I could afford for a car then tracking probably isn’t something I should do anyway (tires gas brakes etc). You really gonna shop around when you’re in that club?
if it was over $100k then I would have the means to cover it and not complain about the cost of membership. It’s an if you have to ask scenario. Don’t buy a jet if you’re gonna bitch about ramp fees.
It’s the middle range that really hurts...where the car is worth just enough to cry if it’s wrecked but the insurance is not an insignificant expense. $70k thru Hagerty is $400. Basically doubles the track fee. Same old middle class gets screwed kinda deal.
if my car was under $30k I wouldn’t bother. I’d risk it and if $30k was all I could afford for a car then tracking probably isn’t something I should do anyway (tires gas brakes etc). You really gonna shop around when you’re in that club?
if it was over $100k then I would have the means to cover it and not complain about the cost of membership. It’s an if you have to ask scenario. Don’t buy a jet if you’re gonna bitch about ramp fees.
It’s the middle range that really hurts...where the car is worth just enough to cry if it’s wrecked but the insurance is not an insignificant expense. $70k thru Hagerty is $400. Basically doubles the track fee. Same old middle class gets screwed kinda deal.
#93
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,449
Received 3,799 Likes
on
2,197 Posts
I have yet to read a situation that really justifies track insurance.
if my car was under $30k I wouldn’t bother. I’d risk it and if $30k was all I could afford for a car then tracking probably isn’t something I should do anyway (tires gas brakes etc). You really gonna shop around when you’re in that club?
if it was over $100k then I would have the means to cover it and not complain about the cost of membership. It’s an if you have to ask scenario. Don’t buy a jet if you’re gonna bitch about ramp fees.
It’s the middle range that really hurts...where the car is worth just enough to cry if it’s wrecked but the insurance is not an insignificant expense. $70k thru Hagerty is $400. Basically doubles the track fee. Same old middle class gets screwed kinda deal.
if my car was under $30k I wouldn’t bother. I’d risk it and if $30k was all I could afford for a car then tracking probably isn’t something I should do anyway (tires gas brakes etc). You really gonna shop around when you’re in that club?
if it was over $100k then I would have the means to cover it and not complain about the cost of membership. It’s an if you have to ask scenario. Don’t buy a jet if you’re gonna bitch about ramp fees.
It’s the middle range that really hurts...where the car is worth just enough to cry if it’s wrecked but the insurance is not an insignificant expense. $70k thru Hagerty is $400. Basically doubles the track fee. Same old middle class gets screwed kinda deal.
The following users liked this post:
Janton9736 (08-23-2019)
#94
#95
Rennlist Member
#96
Originally Posted by DTMiller
There's been some whoppers lately but this is in the running for some kind of award.
There are like, literally, thousands of sub $10k cars on racetracks every week.
There are like, literally, thousands of sub $10k cars on racetracks every week.
#97
Rennlist Member
#98
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,449
Received 3,799 Likes
on
2,197 Posts
Count me among those who track a relatively expensive car (GT3), but have many times considered tracking a Miata. Getting 80-90% of the fun for 10-20% of the cost has its appeal.
#99
Racer
#101
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Connecticut Valley Region
Posts: 14,470
Received 3,287 Likes
on
1,589 Posts
I have yet to read a situation that really justifies track insurance.
if my car was under $30k I wouldn’t bother. I’d risk it and if $30k was all I could afford for a car then tracking probably isn’t something I should do anyway (tires gas brakes etc). You really gonna shop around when you’re in that club?
if it was over $100k then I would have the means to cover it and not complain about the cost of membership. It’s an if you have to ask scenario. Don’t buy a jet if you’re gonna bitch about ramp fees.
It’s the middle range that really hurts...where the car is worth just enough to cry if it’s wrecked but the insurance is not an insignificant expense. $70k thru Hagerty is $400. Basically doubles the track fee. Same old middle class gets screwed kinda deal.
if my car was under $30k I wouldn’t bother. I’d risk it and if $30k was all I could afford for a car then tracking probably isn’t something I should do anyway (tires gas brakes etc). You really gonna shop around when you’re in that club?
if it was over $100k then I would have the means to cover it and not complain about the cost of membership. It’s an if you have to ask scenario. Don’t buy a jet if you’re gonna bitch about ramp fees.
It’s the middle range that really hurts...where the car is worth just enough to cry if it’s wrecked but the insurance is not an insignificant expense. $70k thru Hagerty is $400. Basically doubles the track fee. Same old middle class gets screwed kinda deal.
What someone can walk away from is a very personal financial decision. I insure a car valued around $90k because I couldn't justify balling it up and just writing a check for a new one. That being said, my last car was around $50k and I insured it as well.
My tolerance for financial risk is low so not only do I insure, but I insure with a race policy, which is far and away the most expensive policy out there. In the past, when I did not have a race policy I have used OnTrack.
It's all relative.
The following users liked this post:
Janton9736 (08-23-2019)
#102
Rennlist Member
Insurance is also related with expected returns on investments and liquidity. Even if someone is able to self-insure (i.e. has the net worth to self-insure), in order to self-insure against a $100k loss, one must keep $100k handy either by holding it in cash, keeping a line of credit (ability to quickly borrow), or keeping it in low-risk liquid assets (T-bills) -- all of these come with various opportunity costs on potential investment profits foregone. This should be compared with buying insurance for the potential $100k loss and investing the $100k in riskier and less liquid assets for higher expected returns. If the expected returns on the invested $100k are higher than the insurance premiums, then buying insurance would be financially savvier vs self-insuring. If on the other hand, expected investment returns are low, or someone is already sufficiently exposed to investment risk, then keeping the $100k liquid and self-insuring would make more sense.
#103
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Connecticut Valley Region
Posts: 14,470
Received 3,287 Likes
on
1,589 Posts
Insurance is also related with expected returns on investments and liquidity. Even if someone is able to self-insure (i.e. has the net worth to self-insure), in order to self-insure against a $100k loss, one must keep $100k handy either by holding it in cash, keeping a line of credit (ability to quickly borrow), or keeping it in low-risk liquid assets (T-bills) -- all of these come with various opportunity costs on potential investment profits foregone. This should be compared with buying insurance for the potential $100k loss and investing the $100k in riskier and less liquid assets for higher expected returns. If the expected returns on the invested $100k are higher than the insurance premiums, then buying insurance would be financially savvier vs self-insuring. If on the other hand, expected investment returns are low, or someone is already sufficiently exposed to investment risk, then keeping the $100k liquid and self-insuring would make more sense.
#104
Rennlist Member
#105
Drifting
Just an FYI regarding Hagerty-RLI HPDE Insurance.
I've used and recommended them for the past two years and the rates were very reasonable. Last time was Oct. of last year and the HPDE policy I wanted was $205 (same price for the past two years). I just applied for HPDE insurance for a June DE, exact same coverage and deductible........and the quote was $415 !!
Guess I'll look elsewhere and can't recommend them now..
I've used and recommended them for the past two years and the rates were very reasonable. Last time was Oct. of last year and the HPDE policy I wanted was $205 (same price for the past two years). I just applied for HPDE insurance for a June DE, exact same coverage and deductible........and the quote was $415 !!
Guess I'll look elsewhere and can't recommend them now..