NEW PCA Best Practices for DE (Rant!)
#31
Perfect Angel
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Widows sue car clubs all the time. Insurance rates go up and up and up. Liability waivers are a 50/50 prospect for the club and the track at best. How many more of these events do you think will happen if a car club decided "wear what you want" and somebody gets maimed as a result?
#32
Burning Brakes
This seems pretty simple to me.... maybe I'm missing something though. Helmet, HANS, harness - it's all (and always) together. I don't have the factory belts any more - so it's not even an option. If the determination is that for a student to ride with me they have to have a HANS because I only have harnesses - then so be it. If the student wants to go for a ride along bad enough - then they will find a way.
#33
Fact is there is no testing on the use of a helmet in a car with airbags. None, nada. When I went to the Advanced M Course at the BMW school out at Thermal in February I was really surprised to learn that they had discontinued the use of helmets entirely. The rational was that after speaking with their engineers and of course attorneys they decided that the airbags both drivers and side curtain are not really compatible with helmets. Not sure how much analysis was done but I suspect a fair amount because to remove helmets from the equation is a substantial step especially in a program with speeds just over 140 mph.
Having said that I don't expect any of the groups I do HPDE with to adopt a practice similar to the BMW School for a variety of reasons starting with the wide variety of cars that participate, insurance and of course the school does nearly all of its instruction in lead follow which provides some level of control that you would not see in a typical HPDE day.
Having said that I don't expect any of the groups I do HPDE with to adopt a practice similar to the BMW School for a variety of reasons starting with the wide variety of cars that participate, insurance and of course the school does nearly all of its instruction in lead follow which provides some level of control that you would not see in a typical HPDE day.
I was at NJMP Thundebolt visiting a friend at an event this past October and he had a failure with a brake caliper going into T1. He wasn't going very fast at the time, turning laps in the 1;27-28 range, but starting to get up to speed. Car went left at 140 mph and proceeded to crash into the barrier on the left. Not a straight on shot but the airbags deployed. He was strapped in wearing a 6 point harness and HANS in an FIA racing seat, no cage or roll bar, harness bar only. He was completely fine and did give credit to how well he felt the HANS had protected his neck.
PCA would be well served compiling all the data they have on all of the crashes they have had over the years in order to identify injury trends to determine what is safe and what is not. Then they could either suggest or require use of or elimination of certain safety equipment based on actual data.
#35
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,443
Received 3,798 Likes
on
2,196 Posts
#36
Rennlist Member
Perhaps this is an area where MSF could earn their keep. Probably more value in researching this issue than instructor certification.
I’m seeing a growing number of folks just getting into the track “hobby” who are convinced that they are better protected by the factory safety systems than with full restraints, even to the point of eschewing helmets. I suspect that is likely driven by unwillingness to make the necessary modifications to their 600 HP daily driver. I have a full cage, etc. but I also have a 25 year old car. There’s no question that new cars are built stronger and safer. Does adding a roll bar, or even a cage really add much protection in modern cars? We can all speculate and pontificate, but it would be good to have hard data to support the requirements.
I’m seeing a growing number of folks just getting into the track “hobby” who are convinced that they are better protected by the factory safety systems than with full restraints, even to the point of eschewing helmets. I suspect that is likely driven by unwillingness to make the necessary modifications to their 600 HP daily driver. I have a full cage, etc. but I also have a 25 year old car. There’s no question that new cars are built stronger and safer. Does adding a roll bar, or even a cage really add much protection in modern cars? We can all speculate and pontificate, but it would be good to have hard data to support the requirements.
#37
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,443
Received 3,798 Likes
on
2,196 Posts
Perhaps this is an area where MSF could earn their keep. Probably more value in researching this issue than instructor certification.
I’m seeing a growing number of folks just getting into the track “hobby” who are convinced that they are better protected by the factory safety systems than with full restraints, even to the point of eschewing helmets. I suspect that is likely driven by unwillingness to make the necessary modifications to their 600 HP daily driver. I have a full cage, etc. but I also have a 25 year old car. There’s no question that new cars are built stronger and safer. Does adding a roll bar, or even a cage really add much protection in modern cars? We can all speculate and pontificate, but it would be good to have hard data to support the requirements.
I’m seeing a growing number of folks just getting into the track “hobby” who are convinced that they are better protected by the factory safety systems than with full restraints, even to the point of eschewing helmets. I suspect that is likely driven by unwillingness to make the necessary modifications to their 600 HP daily driver. I have a full cage, etc. but I also have a 25 year old car. There’s no question that new cars are built stronger and safer. Does adding a roll bar, or even a cage really add much protection in modern cars? We can all speculate and pontificate, but it would be good to have hard data to support the requirements.
At least for modern Porsches, they seem to usually do pretty well in rolls, even without a roll bar.
I have a roll bar and harnesses in my 991 GT3, and am satisfied with the level of protection for a car driven on both track and street, but on the track I'm always aware, in the back of my mind, that I don't have a full race car safety system.
#38
Airbag systems are not fault free, nor very forgiving.
Sh*t happens; seen a GT3 go up near a 45 degree roll angle, all 10 airbags got deployed, car didn't roll, but damage was done, weekend over.
Sh*t happens; seen a GT3 go up near a 45 degree roll angle, all 10 airbags got deployed, car didn't roll, but damage was done, weekend over.
#39
For the sake of discussion, where does a head and neck device like the 3pt compatible Simpson Hybrid S fall into the equation?
If the driver is using one of those with a 3-pt belt, should the passenger be using one?
If the driver is using one of those with a 3-pt belt, should the passenger be using one?
#40
I personally believe everyone should be wearing a head and neck restraint regardless of belt configuration. I happen to use the Simpson. In addition I would not make an instructor take their's off if their student did not have one on. If I was told I had to be what is IMO less safe and remove my head and neck restraint I would not get in the student's car.
#41
Rennlist Member
Fact is there is no testing on the use of a helmet in a car with airbags. None, nada. When I went to the Advanced M Course at the BMW school out at Thermal in February I was really surprised to learn that they had discontinued the use of helmets entirely. The rational was that after speaking with their engineers and of course attorneys they decided that the airbags both drivers and side curtain are not really compatible with helmets. Not sure how much analysis was done but I suspect a fair amount because to remove helmets from the equation is a substantial step especially in a program with speeds just over 140 mph.
#42
Rennlist Member
I agree that telling an instructor they can't wear their Simpson Hybrid S in a students car is counterproductive to safety. If a student wants a ride in an instructors car and they don't have a HANS, the answer is simple, either they borrow one or they don't ride in that instructors car. (I'm assuming the instructors car is rollbar/cage, seats, 5-6 point harnesses).
#43
Burning Brakes
I agree that telling an instructor they can't wear their Simpson Hybrid S in a students car is counterproductive to safety. If a student wants a ride in an instructors car and they don't have a HANS, the answer is simple, either they borrow one or they don't ride in that instructors car. (I'm assuming the instructors car is rollbar/cage, seats, 5-6 point harnesses).
#44
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
I agree with the rule - and as Clark said, not because we sell them, but because there is value in being safe. Safety items are mostly not stand alone, they act as a system. HANS (and other brand variations) are part of a full safety SYSTEM - just like a harness and seats that are built for harnesses. I see zero downside. Why do we put race seats and harnesses in the car to begin with? why do we wear helmets? why fire suits? why roll bars and/or cages? There's also a reason why every helmet sold now has backing plate already installed for H&N restraint anchors.
And yes...there was discussion about this 6 months ago or so. This is not new.
The instructor/student question is still an issue....both ways. Say for example a student is driving a car with only 6 pt harness and race seats (yes it happens a lot - spouse or friend or child of a racer) and has a HANS, but the instructor DOES NOT have a H&N restraint because he/she drives a street car without harnesses? (majority of instructors I would guess). rearranging instructor/student match ups is not an insignificant task for a registrar or CI...Just a thought to ponder....
And yes...there was discussion about this 6 months ago or so. This is not new.
The instructor/student question is still an issue....both ways. Say for example a student is driving a car with only 6 pt harness and race seats (yes it happens a lot - spouse or friend or child of a racer) and has a HANS, but the instructor DOES NOT have a H&N restraint because he/she drives a street car without harnesses? (majority of instructors I would guess). rearranging instructor/student match ups is not an insignificant task for a registrar or CI...Just a thought to ponder....
__________________
Bob Saville
Getting You On Track!
www.naroescapemotorsports.com
704-395-2975
'07 SPC
'71 914/6 Huey
'04 GT3
Bob Saville
Getting You On Track!
www.naroescapemotorsports.com
704-395-2975
- Data Analysis & Coaching
- Drivers Gear
- Crew Gear
- Car Gear
'07 SPC
'71 914/6 Huey
'04 GT3
#45
I agree with the rule - and as Clark said, not because we sell them, but because there is value in being safe. Safety items are mostly not stand alone, they act as a system. HANS (and other brand variations) are part of a full safety SYSTEM - just like a harness and seats that are built for harnesses. I see zero downside. Why do we put race seats and harnesses in the car to begin with? why do we wear helmets? why fire suits? why roll bars and/or cages? There's also a reason why every helmet sold now has backing plate already installed for H&N restraint anchors.
And yes...there was discussion about this 6 months ago or so. This is not new.
The instructor/student question is still an issue....both ways. Say for example a student is driving a car with only 6 pt harness and race seats (yes it happens a lot - spouse or friend or child of a racer) and has a HANS, but the instructor DOES NOT have a H&N restraint because he/she drives a street car without harnesses? (majority of instructors I would guess). rearranging instructor/student match ups is not an insignificant task for a registrar or CI...Just a thought to ponder....
And yes...there was discussion about this 6 months ago or so. This is not new.
The instructor/student question is still an issue....both ways. Say for example a student is driving a car with only 6 pt harness and race seats (yes it happens a lot - spouse or friend or child of a racer) and has a HANS, but the instructor DOES NOT have a H&N restraint because he/she drives a street car without harnesses? (majority of instructors I would guess). rearranging instructor/student match ups is not an insignificant task for a registrar or CI...Just a thought to ponder....