996/997 cylinder head differences
#3
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
#4
Former Vendor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes. The 996 cup and 997 cup head ports are somewhat close in size. All R (meaning R, RS and RSR) intake manifolds are somewhat close and have much bigger openings than any of the cup ports. The R exhaust is much larger also.
If you decide the next step might be to use R heads, you should know that the valve angle is different than the cup and the cup cam boxes don't fit or work.
If you decide the next step might be to use R heads, you should know that the valve angle is different than the cup and the cup cam boxes don't fit or work.
#5
Nordschleife Master
Yes, the 6 throttle intakes bolt up to the 997 cup heads. The ports will need to be opened up considerably to be matched.
#6
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Yes. The 996 cup and 997 cup head ports are somewhat close in size. All R (meaning R, RS and RSR) intake manifolds are somewhat close and have much bigger openings than any of the cup ports. The R exhaust is much larger also.
If you decide the next step might be to use R heads, you should know that the valve angle is different than the cup and the cup cam boxes don't fit or work.
If you decide the next step might be to use R heads, you should know that the valve angle is different than the cup and the cup cam boxes don't fit or work.
#7
Former Vendor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Geoffrey (Addict),
Yes, you're correct. However, sometimes you do strange things to get what you need. For instance, I'm building a ground effects 914-6 with GT3 RSR everything. It's going to take alot of developing to get the aero package working well. I may build what looks like an RSR motor that uses cup heads and cam boxes so the RSR exhaust and plumbing is set up but it lasts 150 hours while I'm tuning chassis, tunnels and everything else that goes wrong with a new car like this. Then I replace the motor with a full on RSR motor. Simple as that!
Mark (Addict #2)
Yes, you're correct. However, sometimes you do strange things to get what you need. For instance, I'm building a ground effects 914-6 with GT3 RSR everything. It's going to take alot of developing to get the aero package working well. I may build what looks like an RSR motor that uses cup heads and cam boxes so the RSR exhaust and plumbing is set up but it lasts 150 hours while I'm tuning chassis, tunnels and everything else that goes wrong with a new car like this. Then I replace the motor with a full on RSR motor. Simple as that!
Mark (Addict #2)
Trending Topics
#9
Drifting
I'm sorry. Don't mean to hi-jack the thread, but a 914-6 with an RSR motor? I think this deserves it's own thread, heavily laden with photos.
I'm sure Chris and Geoffrey wouldn't mind learning more about it either...
I'm sure Chris and Geoffrey wouldn't mind learning more about it either...
#10
Former Vendor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chris,
I made the valve angle comment based on observations of my engine parts, not actual measurements (might be wrong, but.....). The cams are spaced the same in cup and R cam boxes, the boxes definitely don't interchange, the R intake valve is much larger and the R exhaust valve is smaller than the cup valves. They are spaced differently in the chamber so I guessed that the angle is different.
mklaskin,
I've been considering doing a build thread regarding the car. I'm not normally inclined to do things like that but this is intended to be a fun club car so I might. I have all the major parts I can aquire and I'm in the design phase now while I finsh a few major projects that are in front of the race car build effort. I hope to start fab work in April or May. Trevor Harris (Frisbee Can-Am, Shadow F1, Nissan GTP, Gurney Eagle Chf. Engr) and I (lots of similar stuff Chf. Engr.) am collaborating together on this. I will be the one who gets to wreck (I mean race) it after building. It's going to be at least 120" WB and around 80" wide with F and R diffusers running as a closed top car in SCCA super pro and NASA Super unlimited. The car will be cut off at the front spindle (bulkhead) and at the rear window. The rest will be tube frame so it won't be PCA legal unless they want to have pitty on us and take our entry money. It should end up looking like a Toyota GTP Gurney Mk III with a 914 roof and sails etc.
Sorry for the divergence; back to normally programmed viewing
I made the valve angle comment based on observations of my engine parts, not actual measurements (might be wrong, but.....). The cams are spaced the same in cup and R cam boxes, the boxes definitely don't interchange, the R intake valve is much larger and the R exhaust valve is smaller than the cup valves. They are spaced differently in the chamber so I guessed that the angle is different.
mklaskin,
I've been considering doing a build thread regarding the car. I'm not normally inclined to do things like that but this is intended to be a fun club car so I might. I have all the major parts I can aquire and I'm in the design phase now while I finsh a few major projects that are in front of the race car build effort. I hope to start fab work in April or May. Trevor Harris (Frisbee Can-Am, Shadow F1, Nissan GTP, Gurney Eagle Chf. Engr) and I (lots of similar stuff Chf. Engr.) am collaborating together on this. I will be the one who gets to wreck (I mean race) it after building. It's going to be at least 120" WB and around 80" wide with F and R diffusers running as a closed top car in SCCA super pro and NASA Super unlimited. The car will be cut off at the front spindle (bulkhead) and at the rear window. The rest will be tube frame so it won't be PCA legal unless they want to have pitty on us and take our entry money. It should end up looking like a Toyota GTP Gurney Mk III with a 914 roof and sails etc.
Sorry for the divergence; back to normally programmed viewing
#11
Nordschleife Master
The rest will be tube frame so it won't be PCA legal unless they want to have pitty on us and take our entry money.
#12
Rennlist Member
Digging up this old thread as it's the only one regarding 996 / 997 Cup heads
Just noticed after cleaning, i have 997 Cup (3.6) Cylinder heads on my 2004 996 Cup.
If all was done correctly which it looks. Is there an advantage over the 996 Cup heads and if so what ?
and ......... since when were these available ?
Part # 99710401692
Thanks
:-)
Just noticed after cleaning, i have 997 Cup (3.6) Cylinder heads on my 2004 996 Cup.
If all was done correctly which it looks. Is there an advantage over the 996 Cup heads and if so what ?
and ......... since when were these available ?
Part # 99710401692
Thanks
:-)
#13
Burning Brakes
Minimal, if any advantage. Per PCA here, it is considered a legal change because 996 heads are either NLA or really hard to get.
Here is PCA Rule, - which seems to answer your question indirectly.
GTC3 cars may use the following 997 parts for an engine rebuild, however, the existing 996 intake runners may not be
modified to match the 997 larger intake port: 997‐104‐016‐92 cylinder heads, 997‐105‐039‐91 camshaft housing 1‐3,
997‐105‐040‐91 camshaft housing 4‐6, 996‐105‐236‐97 Intake camshaft
And FYI, how is that Red 964 Cup. Still have it ?
Here is PCA Rule, - which seems to answer your question indirectly.
GTC3 cars may use the following 997 parts for an engine rebuild, however, the existing 996 intake runners may not be
modified to match the 997 larger intake port: 997‐104‐016‐92 cylinder heads, 997‐105‐039‐91 camshaft housing 1‐3,
997‐105‐040‐91 camshaft housing 4‐6, 996‐105‐236‐97 Intake camshaft
And FYI, how is that Red 964 Cup. Still have it ?
#15
Pro
997.104.016.92 showed up in the 2007 Cup TK, ran through 2009 including Cup-S, WC and GA versions. 2006 Cup and 2007 WC VTS listed 996.104.092.97.
Last edited by lordpantsington; 12-31-2020 at 03:39 PM.