Pano roof
#16
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Pano most definitely affects handling. It's basic physics. Significant extra weight i.e. 60-100 kg at the very highest point of the vehicle will alter the vehicle's centre of gravity. How much of a difference it makes is a different question. I could do without the pano in my Macan easily. I hardly ever use it, though I agree that it makes the cabin feel more open.
#17
Instructor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It has nothing to do with getting back the cost of the pano roof, it has everything to do with actually selling the vehicle at a fair price! The car will have to be deeply discounted to even sell it because 9 out of 10 buyers will absolutely require the pano roof for them to buy it!
#18
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It has nothing to do with getting back the cost of the pano roof, it has everything to do with actually selling the vehicle at a fair price! The car will have to be deeply discounted to even sell it because 9 out of 10 buyers will absolutely require the pano roof for them to buy it!
#19
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No doubt there is no real cheating physics, but how do we know the weight delta over a steel roof is really 60-100kg? That's quite a range, 130-220 lbs. Which is it? Certainly a double panel, insulated steel roof doesn't weigh zero. Of course, if you need the headroom taken away by the pano roof, you need it. Anyway, if you don't like it, for whatever reason, that's certainly your choice; that's why it's optional.
#20
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It has nothing to do with getting back the cost of the pano roof, it has everything to do with actually selling the vehicle at a fair price! The car will have to be deeply discounted to even sell it because 9 out of 10 buyers will absolutely require the pano roof for them to buy it!
#21
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'll give another example. I ordered a Macan S without Nav and without Pano roof. It arrived but the dealership ordered the wrong seats. So they ordered me a new car. The original car they sold within 30 days. No issue with not having Nav or not having a Pano roof, the two most popular options. Mind you it was a new vehicle so not exactly the same as selling a used vehicle; just to illustrate that there are all kinds of buyers out there.
The replacement vehicle they ordered me arrived with a Pano roof, which I did not order, but I took delivery anyway.
Now I have ordered a GTS having owned my S for a year and am ordering it without a a pano roof as I find I literally never use it. I want the best possible handling GTS I can get. One can definitely notice a difference in how flat a Macan corners depending on if it has a Pano roof or not.
The replacement vehicle they ordered me arrived with a Pano roof, which I did not order, but I took delivery anyway.
Now I have ordered a GTS having owned my S for a year and am ordering it without a a pano roof as I find I literally never use it. I want the best possible handling GTS I can get. One can definitely notice a difference in how flat a Macan corners depending on if it has a Pano roof or not.
#22
Instructor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have the pano roof on my Macan S.....love it....really brightens up the cabin with the screen open. My Cayenne GTS doesnt have it and i do notice it feels "darker" inside without it.
#23
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Pano most definitely affects handling. It's basic physics. Significant extra weight i.e. 60-100 kg at the very highest point of the vehicle will alter the vehicle's centre of gravity. How much of a difference it makes is a different question. I could do without the pano in my Macan easily. I hardly ever use it, though I agree that it makes the cabin feel more open.
No doubt there is no real cheating physics, but how do we know the weight delta over a steel roof is really 60-100kg? That's quite a range, 130-220 lbs. Which is it? Certainly a double panel, insulated steel roof doesn't weigh zero. Of course, if you need the headroom taken away by the pano roof, you need it. Anyway, if you don't like it, for whatever reason, that's certainly your choice; that's why it's optional.
If you're a professional driver with thousands of hours of seat time, you'd likely notice it, but if you're a weekend track type, you'll think you notice it because someone told you it affects the handling.
Again (and I am admittedly assuming a very favorable CG chart for the vehicle), I suspect that the addition of the roof would not correspond to a 3-5%, 0 degree (i.e. straight vertical) change in the overall CG, and therefore, the percentage impact to handling would be even less than that 3-5%, making it even harder to notice for us mere mortals.
I'm not sure I accept the premise everyone says that options are worth $0, but the bottom line for this discussion is that if pano is a must have option, than it will absolutely affect resale. If someone opts not to buy the vehicle because of no pano, the value of the option is infinity, effectively, for that buyer.
#24
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not sure I accept the premise everyone says that options are worth $0, but the bottom line for this discussion is that if pano is a must have option, than it will absolutely affect resale. If someone opts not to buy the vehicle because of no pano, the value of the option is infinity, effectively, for that buyer.
#25
#26
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Since previous posters have said most have them....
#27
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would think the majority of new vehicles would have pano roofs at least in North America.
#28
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#30
Instructor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'll give another example. I ordered a Macan S without Nav and without Pano roof. It arrived but the dealership ordered the wrong seats. So they ordered me a new car. The original car they sold within 30 days. No issue with not having Nav or not having a Pano roof, the two most popular options. Mind you it was a new vehicle so not exactly the same as selling a used vehicle; just to illustrate that there are all kinds of buyers out there.
The replacement vehicle they ordered me arrived with a Pano roof, which I did not order, but I took delivery anyway.
Now I have ordered a GTS having owned my S for a year and am ordering it without a a pano roof as I find I literally never use it. I want the best possible handling GTS I can get. One can definitely notice a difference in how flat a Macan corners depending on if it has a Pano roof or not.
The replacement vehicle they ordered me arrived with a Pano roof, which I did not order, but I took delivery anyway.
Now I have ordered a GTS having owned my S for a year and am ordering it without a a pano roof as I find I literally never use it. I want the best possible handling GTS I can get. One can definitely notice a difference in how flat a Macan corners depending on if it has a Pano roof or not.