Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

Experiment: A "fast road" alignment spec for the GT4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2017 | 05:36 PM
  #31  
Alan C.'s Avatar
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 1,068
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by bhk1004
thanks for the update. I am the only idiot. Everyone ignore me!
But then we wouldn't have anyone to talk about.
Old 04-03-2017 | 04:03 AM
  #32  
Yargk's Avatar
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 240
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

Good logic and thought behind this setup.

(I'd take a tad more rear toe-in for stability on corner entry, but that's it, and I'd probably make the car a little less lively at lower street speeds by doing so!)
Old 04-03-2017 | 10:13 AM
  #33  
kahane18's Avatar
kahane18
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 454
Likes: 21
From: NYC
Default

Hi Guys,

Just had mine aligned this weekend installed Tarrett drop links and TPC rear links.
Aligned it for dual use street and some track use, had to use shims front and back and these are the max numbers I was able to achieve without affecting caster too much.
Any thought or input is welcome, going to the track in May. So far feels much more responsive on the street.
Thanks
Attached Images    
Old 04-03-2017 | 10:56 AM
  #34  
jmartpr's Avatar
jmartpr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,759
Likes: 1,487
Default

Where those alignment measurements taken with you on the car?
Old 04-03-2017 | 11:42 AM
  #35  
stout's Avatar
stout
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,919
Likes: 1,332
From: ^ The Bay Bridge
Default

Originally Posted by KOTYKB
OP - Do you mind posting pictures of the stance of the car now?
Took some pics over the weekend, but this photo from EASY on Saturday taken by good guy J. Goriup is better than any of them.
Thread found here: http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...st-Sat-April-1

I'm happy to get more pics if people would like other angles.
Attached Images  
Old 04-03-2017 | 11:44 AM
  #36  
kahane18's Avatar
kahane18
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 454
Likes: 21
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by jmartpr
Where those alignment measurements taken with you on the car?
yes they put the weights in the driver seat about 230 lb's and full tank of gas...
Old 04-03-2017 | 11:50 AM
  #37  
stout's Avatar
stout
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,919
Likes: 1,332
From: ^ The Bay Bridge
Default

A few quick updates/obsevervations:

-I have yet to encounter any freeway situation in which the car follows grooves. 996 GT3s did that all over the place, so I was ready for a bit of that given my friend's warning. So far, nada. Will keep an eye out for it, but I see no downside to this setup yet.

-I skipped "the raise the front of the car" 1/8th inch for clearance, as I haven't had clearance problems. I'm still on my same front lip 7400 miles later, and it looks just fine with only some very minor scuffs along its bottom. Visually, I'd love to drop the front 1/4 inch and the rear a 1/2 inch—I don't think that would be a clearance issue for me—but I am leery about running the GT4 under the factory specs due to effective compression travel, as well as rake cancel. It seems Porsche likes a little rake in the GT4, though my experience with mid-engined cars suggests I don't. May play with that down the road. We'll see.

-Those initial impressions were telling: On the street, the handling is SUPERB. I feel it in every corner—that alertness with more security—and there is one particular corner that has caught me off guard, a long sweeping right onto 101 from my house. The corner has big depression at the apex, one that upsets just about every car I've driven through it if you're on it and get aggressive at the apex, going further inside. The unscientific part of this is that, in my recollection, my GT4 felt no different to me than other cars here. The fall-off was no problem, but the bump back up to level led to mild histrionics—in the wet bad enough that you could get into trouble. Well, now my GT4 does feel different than just about everything else: It tracks right through this apex crater almost as if it isn't there.

More time, miles, and drivers will reveal more, but I am really digging this setup—and my friend calculates little or no downside on tire wear.
Old 04-04-2017 | 02:04 AM
  #38  
ericdc's Avatar
ericdc
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 45
Likes: 26
Default

I took mine to the dealer today to get tires mounted and an alignment. 8 hours later they still weren't done and sent me home with a loaner.

I am hoping for 2 degrees up front and 1.5 in the rear but they weren't able to achieve that today. It seems something was amiss in how the rear subframe was assembled so they want to disassemble the car to get the rear camber even.

It looks like I am in for a $500+ alignment to get anything north of 1 degree of camber. It is amazing to me that a car with so many adjustments can get so little camber without such extreme measures.
Old 04-04-2017 | 05:04 AM
  #39  
mrd_spy's Avatar
mrd_spy
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 838
Likes: 225
Default

it's because Porsche fitted non adjustable rear toe links, just buy a set of those, we all have :-)
Old 04-04-2017 | 10:39 AM
  #40  
jmartpr's Avatar
jmartpr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,759
Likes: 1,487
Default

Originally Posted by stout
Those initial impressions were telling: On the street, the handling is SUPERB. I feel it in every corner—that alertness with more security—and there is one particular corner that has caught me off guard, a long sweeping right onto 101 from my house. The corner has big depression at the apex, one that upsets just about every car I've driven through it if you're on it and get aggressive at the apex, going further inside. The unscientific part of this is that, in my recollection, my GT4 felt no different to me than other cars here. The fall-off was no problem, but the bump back up to level led to mild histrionics—in the wet bad enough that you could get into trouble. Well, now my GT4 does feel different than just about everything else: It tracks right through this apex crater almost as if it isn't there.

More time, miles, and drivers will reveal more, but I am really digging this setup—and my friend calculates little or no downside on tire wear.



You should try the DSC....IMO it lets you carry more speed and get on the gas earlier without too much drama. If you have tracks like us which feature sections that are not so great the DSC is a great tool.
Old 04-04-2017 | 10:45 AM
  #41  
orthojoe's Avatar
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 7,804
Likes: 191
From: Bay Area
Default

Pete, you are welcome to try out my dsc unit anytime if you are interested.
Old 04-04-2017 | 10:55 AM
  #42  
jmartpr's Avatar
jmartpr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,759
Likes: 1,487
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Pete, you are welcome to try out my dsc unit anytime if you are interested.

Joe...are you running TPC toe links? Just a heads up in case Pete goes for the test to load a map for a stock toe link. Mine came with a Map optimize for TPCs toe links.
Old 04-04-2017 | 01:24 PM
  #43  
stout's Avatar
stout
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,919
Likes: 1,332
From: ^ The Bay Bridge
Default

Originally Posted by ericdc
I took mine to the dealer today to get tires mounted and an alignment. 8 hours later they still weren't done and sent me home with a loaner.

I am hoping for 2 degrees up front and 1.5 in the rear but they weren't able to achieve that today. It seems something was amiss in how the rear subframe was assembled so they want to disassemble the car to get the rear camber even.

It looks like I am in for a $500+ alignment to get anything north of 1 degree of camber. It is amazing to me that a car with so many adjustments can get so little camber without such extreme measures.
Sounds like something is off, as my car needed none of that. Hmm.

Btw, $500 is not a lot for a GT4 alignment—at least at Bay Area labor rates, anyway. It takes a few hours to do it right.
Old 04-04-2017 | 01:25 PM
  #44  
stout's Avatar
stout
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,919
Likes: 1,332
From: ^ The Bay Bridge
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Pete, you are welcome to try out my dsc unit anytime if you are interested.
Many thanks, Joe!

DSC is something I am interested in, along with the toe links, given my good experiences with TPC over the years. But I'm curious how well the stock car can be set up first. Of course, the nice thing with DSC is it's an easy swap back and forth.
Old 04-04-2017 | 02:09 PM
  #45  
kahane18's Avatar
kahane18
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 454
Likes: 21
From: NYC
Default

Btw, $500 is not a lot for a GT4 alignment—at least at Bay Area labor rates, anyway. It takes a few hours to do it right.[/QUOTE]

Mine cost about $500 including corner balancing and shims took about 4 hours.
Not done by a dealer, by a reputable performance shop on the east coast.


Quick Reply: Experiment: A "fast road" alignment spec for the GT4



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:37 AM.