Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

Drove Sharkwerks GT4 development car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2016 | 08:23 PM
  #1  
stout's Avatar
stout
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,919
Likes: 1,332
From: ^ The Bay Bridge
Default Drove Sharkwerks GT4 development car

Took a run to Pt Reyes in a GT4 re-geared from third gear up with a lightweight flywheel, a GT limited-slip diff, headers, and a tune. First, I want to say kudos to Sharkwerks for developing its future offerings on its own shop cars—rather than customer cars—and for trying stuff out and asking for outside feedback and criticism as it does so...and then saying, "Go ahead, put your thoughts out there, and don't be shy."

What I learned after a couple of hours on good roads: The mods wake the car up nicely, and make the powertrain feel more "GT." The lightweight flywheel might contribute the most significant and immediately obvious shift in personality, with three benefits: a revvier 3.8, subtle GT3 RS gear rattle noises (if you're into that kind of thing, like I am), and a lighter clutch pedal. Alex says Sharkwerks can make the clutch pedal heavier artificially, but one has to ask what the benefit is? The lighter clutch takes a little getting used to for those of us accustomed to GTx cars in this post 997-1 GT3 era, but it's nicer to live with this way—and a heavier clutch pedal doesn't add performance. Also of interest: The auto-blipper in Sport mode still works perfectly, suggesting it can deal with both the lightweight flywheel AND new gear ratios. Hmm. So it seems it may be a bit like PSM, in that it can adapt within a window.

The new third gear is better than the stock ratio for back roads—but a better way forward would be adding a new first and second gear ($,$$$ due to the need for two more new gears and a new mainshaft) or a lower ring and pinion with a taller sixth gear to keep a freeway cog. As is, the new third tops out at 93~ mph, just 9 higher than the stock second. It makes the new third and fourth great for track work, and third better for back roads, but if you shift from second to third at redline, the rpm drop is so small that initial clutch feedback will have you thinking "You missed a shift! Don't let the clutch out all the way!" Effectively, the car has two third gears—and the second third gear would only really make me happy if I was tracking the car a lot, as it is a good gateway to the new fourth and fifth. But the new third gear doesn't make much sense with the stock second gear. The good news is Sharkwerks TRIES stuff, and then keeps fiddling. In this case, it needs to keep fiddling. This feels to me a bit like the 997-1 GT3 RS 3.8 engine that never made it to the sales shelf—no bad thing, because that trial led to the 3.9. Which remains my favorite NA flat six of them all for character.

Back to the GT4: The sport headers with high-flow cats and the stock muffler—the combo Sharkwerks arrived at as its first preference after trying a lot of mufflers—and the retune contribute to 415 hp (claimed). I can't verify that, but the GT4 felt smoother than mine does through the revs on California pump gas, and stronger too. Noises were sublime in either mode, with no drone. There is zero downside to this exhaust other than cost and warranty, as far as I can tell.

That's the quick report from here.
Attached Images   

Last edited by stout; 10-10-2016 at 08:40 PM.
Old 10-10-2016 | 08:33 PM
  #2  
neanicu's Avatar
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 9,991
Likes: 386
From: Ny
Default

Thanks for your thoughts Pete and great work Sharkwerks and GTGears!
Old 10-10-2016 | 09:43 PM
  #3  
Leuz's Avatar
Leuz
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 205
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Probably an obvious question, but are they using their own custom built headers, or using third-party?
Old 10-10-2016 | 11:22 PM
  #4  
Beantown Kman's Avatar
Beantown Kman
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 910
Likes: 9
From: Northeast
Default

Thanks for the nice write-up Pete. Your experience would seem to confirm the challenges of re-gearing the car without changing the ring and pinion. Doing one without the other is not ideal.

I'm surprised you weren't more impressed by the power mods. Must be that west coast petrol. Would love to hear your thoughts with a tank of 93 octane in the tank.
Old 10-10-2016 | 11:37 PM
  #5  
laranja's Avatar
laranja
Pro
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 651
Likes: 15
Default

Thanks for the write up!
Old 10-10-2016 | 11:53 PM
  #6  
Yargk's Avatar
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 241
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Beantown Kman
Thanks for the nice write-up Pete. Your experience would seem to confirm the challenges of re-gearing the car without changing the ring and pinion. Doing one without the other is not ideal.

I'm surprised you weren't more impressed by the power mods. Must be that west coast petrol. Would love to hear your thoughts with a tank of 93 octane in the tank.
Eh, the butt dyno is a bit useless for a gain of a few percent, so I'm glad to hear Stout's honesty. That's not to say it's not worth it to do the mods. I like the idea of 415 hp a lot (but will keep mine stock for now), however, I wouldn't expect to experience it by feel. I expect it to shine through during dyno confirmation and also, 30 hp is enough to see an extra 3 mph at the straight at thunderhill which will come out pretty clearly in that data. Of course for something like 450 hp, you'd feel that.
Old 10-11-2016 | 12:14 AM
  #7  
Alan C.'s Avatar
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 1,069
From: Ohio
Default

Pete, Thanks for your thoughts and time. Good having you on the GT4 forum.
Old 10-11-2016 | 01:19 AM
  #8  
mooty's Avatar
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 43,566
Likes: 5,898
From: san francisco
Default

good stuff.
Old 10-11-2016 | 11:51 AM
  #9  
Beantown Kman's Avatar
Beantown Kman
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 910
Likes: 9
From: Northeast
Default

Originally Posted by Yargk
Eh, the butt dyno is a bit useless for a gain of a few percent, so I'm glad to hear Stout's honesty. That's not to say it's not worth it to do the mods. I like the idea of 415 hp a lot (but will keep mine stock for now), however, I wouldn't expect to experience it by feel. I expect it to shine through during dyno confirmation and also, 30 hp is enough to see an extra 3 mph at the straight at thunderhill which will come out pretty clearly in that data. Of course for something like 450 hp, you'd feel that.
Those of us who have installed headers and a tune found the improvement in performance to be very noticeable. Not subtle at all. But I suspect most of us are using 93 octane fuel, or higher. It's becoming more evident that octane is a large factor in this engine's ability to produce power. Even Pete noticed it when he put some race gas in his own car.
Old 10-11-2016 | 02:17 PM
  #10  
JAhmed's Avatar
JAhmed
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 1,944
From: CHICAGOLAND!!!
Default

Awesome.
Old 10-11-2016 | 03:18 PM
  #11  
electronspeeder's Avatar
electronspeeder
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 174
Likes: 6
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Would it be more effective to change the final drive to get 1-2 down and put in longer 3-6 gears instead?
Old 10-11-2016 | 04:46 PM
  #12  
GTgears's Avatar
GTgears
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,167
Likes: 126
From: Loveland, CO
Default

Hello Pete,

First off, congrats on the new endeavor. It's all over FB this morning and sounds awesome. Really excited for you and for enthusiast readers.

I want to comment on the gearing. What Sharkwerks has in their car is a motorsports set of ratios. Furthermore, it is the shortest set we've done and was designed to mate best with the 2.05 2nd gear found in some of the other Cayman/Boxster gearboxes. Yes, it is extremely close to 2nd and not what we would recommend/sell to most people.

The more appropriate 3rd for a racer would be our 1.60 gear, which would add another 3-4mph in gear and improve the drop a little bit. If it was a DE car, we wouldn't even go that short and would put in a 1.55 or 1.526 as part of our 3 gear package, which leaves 6th stock. Those 3rd gears top out right around 100mph.

Readers, please don't ask me to go into greater detail here in this thread. Sharkwerks and I are putting together something that should answer all your questions and be included in their build thread. If you have questions for Pete about his impressions, fire away, but I'm not going to flesh out the offerings more here. I just wanted to nip certain questions and concerns in the bud based on what's already been posted.

Regards,

Matt Monson
Guard Transmission LLC
Old 10-11-2016 | 07:37 PM
  #13  
stout's Avatar
stout
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,919
Likes: 1,332
From: ^ The Bay Bridge
Default

Originally Posted by GTgears
Hello Pete,

First off, congrats on the new endeavor. It's all over FB this morning and sounds awesome. Really excited for you and for enthusiast readers.

I want to comment on the gearing. What Sharkwerks has in their car is a motorsports set of ratios. Furthermore, it is the shortest set we've done and was designed to mate best with the 2.05 2nd gear found in some of the other Cayman/Boxster gearboxes. Yes, it is extremely close to 2nd and not what we would recommend/sell to most people.

The more appropriate 3rd for a racer would be our 1.60 gear, which would add another 3-4mph in gear and improve the drop a little bit. If it was a DE car, we wouldn't even go that short and would put in a 1.55 or 1.526 as part of our 3 gear package, which leaves 6th stock. Those 3rd gears top out right around 100mph.

Readers, please don't ask me to go into greater detail here in this thread. Sharkwerks and I are putting together something that should answer all your questions and be included in their build thread. If you have questions for Pete about his impressions, fire away, but I'm not going to flesh out the offerings more here. I just wanted to nip certain questions and concerns in the bud based on what's already been posted.

Regards,

Matt Monson
Guard Transmission LLC
Thanks, Matt!

If there's anything I learned in my time with the Sharkwerks car, it's this: This is one street/track Porsche that's really worth playing around with the gearbox on. The new third made the car better on back roads, and fourth actually became useful....
Old 10-11-2016 | 09:18 PM
  #14  
skl's Avatar
skl
Official Wednesday AM Red Bull F1 test driver
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 10,054
Likes: 979
From: North Scottsdale
Default

Have to keep watching this thread- would be interested in some of these mods on my Spyder at some point...

BTW, congrats Pete- just signed up!
Old 10-11-2016 | 09:25 PM
  #15  
Beantown Kman's Avatar
Beantown Kman
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 910
Likes: 9
From: Northeast
Default

Originally Posted by GTgears
Hello Pete,

First off, congrats on the new endeavor. It's all over FB this morning and sounds awesome. Really excited for you and for enthusiast readers.

I want to comment on the gearing. What Sharkwerks has in their car is a motorsports set of ratios. Furthermore, it is the shortest set we've done and was designed to mate best with the 2.05 2nd gear found in some of the other Cayman/Boxster gearboxes. Yes, it is extremely close to 2nd and not what we would recommend/sell to most people.

The more appropriate 3rd for a racer would be our 1.60 gear, which would add another 3-4mph in gear and improve the drop a little bit. If it was a DE car, we wouldn't even go that short and would put in a 1.55 or 1.526 as part of our 3 gear package, which leaves 6th stock. Those 3rd gears top out right around 100mph.

Readers, please don't ask me to go into greater detail here in this thread. Sharkwerks and I are putting together something that should answer all your questions and be included in their build thread. If you have questions for Pete about his impressions, fire away, but I'm not going to flesh out the offerings more here. I just wanted to nip certain questions and concerns in the bud based on what's already been posted.

Regards,

Matt Monson
Guard Transmission LLC
Okay Matt. Got it. Looking forward to hearing the rest of the story.


Quick Reply: Drove Sharkwerks GT4 development car



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:36 PM.