Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder

strut tower failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2017 | 06:52 PM
  #391  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Joe Weinstein
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Shockwave
Status of your car Joe?
Hi thanks, I'm back in action, the car's perfect, checked, aligned, corner-balanced and back in the fray!
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2017 | 07:35 PM
  #392  
Shockwave's Avatar
Shockwave
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 100
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Weinstein
Hi thanks, I'm back in action, the car's perfect, checked, aligned, corner-balanced and back in the fray!
Thats awesome to hear!! Welcome back.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 11:21 AM
  #393  
okie981's Avatar
okie981
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 764
From: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Default

Originally Posted by chasen1211
I saw another one happen out at Thunderhill a month or two back. I picked up the strut tower brackets like in the Clubsports from PMNA for some peace of mind.
Nice . Do the brackets tie to the strut tower or body of the car anyplace besides the three fasteners on the top of the tower?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2017 | 01:34 PM
  #394  
chasen1211's Avatar
chasen1211
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 621
Likes: 13
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by HelpMeHelpU
That's a great idea. Care sharing cost of STBs and install?
$350 for the brackets.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 02:12 PM
  #395  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Joe Weinstein
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 17
Default A metalurgical post-script...

I was able to get the part examined (thoroughly but 'unofficially'*) by a metals lab, and there were some aspects of interest.

They were not told, but from their tests they were able to identify the metal as from Porsche, because it is apparently a proprietary aluminum alloy that is very strong. I would guess that any shop that ever simply tries to weld one of these back together would be fighting a metallurgical battle they couldn't win.

They found that my part had two fracture surfaces, meaning that a crack had occurred much prior to the date of my road incident, and the complete failure was induced by enough new jolting to break the rest of it. It seems we should define a regular inspection protocol for this part, and perhaps a concerted consideration of the club-sport reinforcement part, and a write-up on what it takes to install? I still have most of the broken part to examine. I would want to make sure the reinforcement actually added support where the fracture occurred...

*The information was delivered unofficially, delivered by word-of-mouth only, for free as a kind and generous professional courtesy. They can make this information available in a formal detailed official engineering report, for a time, if it is paid for, and it is not likely to be cheap. This is because an official report exposes the testing company to time spent later, in involvement in any business or legal proceeding in which the report might become material.

HTH,
Joe
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 02:41 PM
  #396  
jmartpr's Avatar
jmartpr
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 1,501
Default

Originally Posted by chasen1211
I saw another one happen out at Thunderhill a month or two back. I picked up the strut tower brackets like in the Clubsports from PMNA for some peace of mind.






Is this a part that can be sourced from aftermarket sellers or just PMNA?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 03:36 PM
  #397  
stout's Avatar
stout
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 1,474
From: ^ The Bay Bridge
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Weinstein
I was able to get the part examined (thoroughly but 'unofficially'*) by a metals lab, and there were some aspects of interest.

They were not told, but from their tests they were able to identify the metal as from Porsche, because it is apparently a proprietary aluminum alloy that is very strong. I would guess that any shop that ever simply tries to weld one of these back together would be fighting a metallurgical battle they couldn't win.

They found that my part had two fracture surfaces, meaning that a crack had occurred much prior to the date of my road incident, and the complete failure was induced by enough new jolting to break the rest of it. It seems we should define a regular inspection protocol for this part, and perhaps a concerted consideration of the club-sport reinforcement part, and a write-up on what it takes to install? I still have most of the broken part to examine. I would want to make sure the reinforcement actually added support where the fracture occurred...

*The information was delivered unofficially, delivered by word-of-mouth only, for free as a kind and generous professional courtesy. They can make this information available in a formal detailed official engineering report, for a time, if it is paid for, and it is not likely to be cheap. This is because an official report exposes the testing company to time spent later, in involvement in any business or legal proceeding in which the report might become material.

HTH,
Joe

Extremely interesting, and thank you for doing this for the community, Joe.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 04:54 PM
  #398  
Yargk's Avatar
Yargk
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 347
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

+1
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 04:55 PM
  #399  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Joe Weinstein
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by stout
Extremely interesting, and thank you for doing this for the community, Joe.
You're very welcome, we help each other, and there are others to thank, who will remain nameless.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 08:41 PM
  #400  
BryanCO's Avatar
BryanCO
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 446
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Weinstein
I was able to get the part examined (thoroughly but 'unofficially'*) by a metals lab, and there were some aspects of interest.

They were not told, but from their tests they were able to identify the metal as from Porsche, because it is apparently a proprietary aluminum alloy that is very strong. I would guess that any shop that ever simply tries to weld one of these back together would be fighting a metallurgical battle they couldn't win.

They found that my part had two fracture surfaces, meaning that a crack had occurred much prior to the date of my road incident, and the complete failure was induced by enough new jolting to break the rest of it. It seems we should define a regular inspection protocol for this part, and perhaps a concerted consideration of the club-sport reinforcement part, and a write-up on what it takes to install? I still have most of the broken part to examine. I would want to make sure the reinforcement actually added support where the fracture occurred...

*The information was delivered unofficially, delivered by word-of-mouth only, for free as a kind and generous professional courtesy. They can make this information available in a formal detailed official engineering report, for a time, if it is paid for, and it is not likely to be cheap. This is because an official report exposes the testing company to time spent later, in involvement in any business or legal proceeding in which the report might become material.

HTH,
Joe
Thanks for the info.

So, what was the unofficial failure mode of the original crack?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 09:08 PM
  #401  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Joe Weinstein
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by BryanCO
Thanks for the info.

So, what was the unofficial failure mode of the original crack?
As I recall, the implication was that it was also impact-originating, as opposed to any gaps/imperfections in the metal. I cannot think of any prior impact though... Bumpy roads at worst. No air, no track days, so no corner kerbs etc.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 12:40 AM
  #402  
Beantown Kman's Avatar
Beantown Kman
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 910
Likes: 9
From: Northeast
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Weinstein
As I recall, the implication was that it was also impact-originating, as opposed to any gaps/imperfections in the metal. I cannot think of any prior impact though... Bumpy roads at worst. No air, no track days, so no corner kerbs etc.
Another thank you for all you have posted about this. Was your car ever driven by anyone else that could have contributed to the problem?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 12:47 AM
  #403  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Joe Weinstein
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Beantown Kman
Another thank you for all you have posted about this. Was your car ever driven by anyone else that could have contributed to the problem?
25 miles on it at delivery, and only left at the dealer once for an oil change at 1100 miles. Neglected to check the in/out miles for that visit (not yet that paranoid)
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 12:50 AM
  #404  
stout's Avatar
stout
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 1,474
From: ^ The Bay Bridge
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Weinstein
As I recall, the implication was that it was also impact-originating, as opposed to any gaps/imperfections in the metal. I cannot think of any prior impact though... Bumpy roads at worst. No air, no track days, so no corner kerbs etc.
This is the truly scary part, as is the failure mode analysis (impact you don't remember > subsequent failure with unknown period between). And the mileage on your car wasn't high.

Still, there are a lot of cars out there running with no problem at all. So it seems to be a freak occurrence, or near freak occurrence—but it would be wonderful to understand this better. We may never get there, but your work and the work of others has shed some invaluable light on the incident with your car. Good to hear the piece is made of super strong material, still wondering whether the analysis company can tell us more, politely and off the record (is it brittle? is it a good use of said material? etc) in its opinion. Wonder if the first impact even happened in some aspect of the shipping/delivery.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 07:51 AM
  #405  
bretster's Avatar
bretster
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 156
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by stout
Wonder if the first impact even happened in some aspect of the shipping/delivery.
Aren't the cars driven on and off the RO-RO vessels? In my shipping experiences, while complaining about the cost of some crates, an export packer once told me, "A stevedore could tear up a bowling ball with a cigarette paper."
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:56 AM.