Clubsport “low maintenance”?
#31
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Admittedly, my search skills isn’t great. My quick search didn’t get me to specifics yet.
What makes the GT3 Cup a lot more expensive to run? Remember, I am talking about mellow driving of the car during private track days. Same engine, similar transmission, similar suspension, no?
A race team, I understand the higher the tier, cost increase super linearly.
What makes the GT3 Cup a lot more expensive to run? Remember, I am talking about mellow driving of the car during private track days. Same engine, similar transmission, similar suspension, no?
A race team, I understand the higher the tier, cost increase super linearly.
#32
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ForeverCar...Cup cars are like shifter karts they don't like to be run Mellow. They need to be in a certain manner, shifted at a certain RPM range etc. Plus a cup car can and will bite you a lot easier for a mistake than something like a GT4. The slower the car to start with the faster a driver you will become.
#33
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For what you describe, I would say a qualified "yes" for a Clubsport. I don't know if there are things unique to the RS CS though (other than the engine/ trans time out). For me going from street Porsche GTs to the 718 Clubsport there was incremental effort needed, but not extreme. For example, I needed to learn some basics of the Cosworth software to upload setups to the dash (via ethernet cable). I have pumped out the fuel cell a few times. My FEV fire bottle is timed out and I need to get it recertified or replaced. Things like that. I don't have the Motorsport PIWIS version and have the car serviced at the dealer for items needing that. Just had the 2 yr PDK fluid service done. If the RS is similar then you could likely self support for a track day. I have a friend that drives a 997 cup on his own. I also met a driver a few years ago that had one of the PCA edition 991 Cups and he had a buddy helping with tires etc, but otherwise self supporting.
#34
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
+1 on the difficulty of safely performing "mello" laps on a purpose-built, high-level GT car like a 992 GT3 Cup. Just talking from a driving perspective.
The more high strung a GT car is (cams, compression, throttle mapping, racing brake pads, rotors and hydraulic ratios, gearing, general lack of suspension compliance, not to mention slicks, real ones), the more it needs to be driven with enough controlled aggression, almost violence, compared to what most track day drivers are used to, JUST in order to get the tire temps, brake temps, traction and transitional handling up to a level that ensures predictable behavior.
Not saying an enthusiast jumping in the deep end with one of these couldn't go very easy, just saying it wouldn't be very much fun, and it would entail some risk on-track. Now, get GOING and the car comes alive and actually drives better, with more predictible grip and braking power. Smoother, too.
The GT4 level cars (specifically the 981 and 718 GT4 ClubSports, less so for the RS ClubSport) are much more accommodating of the kind of casual use, even up to what most amateur drivers would consider significant pace, that they're likely to see at track days, club days and DE use. Definitely lower maintenance and longer intervals between component lifing. Even though the 981 GT4 CS series are getting on in years, they still hold up well.
As pointed out, the GT4 car is a great training ground for the "big" car, which is basically a GT3 (worldwide specification) one make car without BoP restrictions.
I see a fair number of self-maintained (at the track, sent to shops periodically) GT4 cars and a few previous gen GT3 Cups at the track. David, Erez and Kevin go (or will go) to the track with minimal support and on their own in their 992 GT3 Cups, but all three have some significant experience in street/factory-built racing Porsches, and all three of their cars will spend many more hours on the car in the garage or shop for every hour they're on track.
Good luck!
The more high strung a GT car is (cams, compression, throttle mapping, racing brake pads, rotors and hydraulic ratios, gearing, general lack of suspension compliance, not to mention slicks, real ones), the more it needs to be driven with enough controlled aggression, almost violence, compared to what most track day drivers are used to, JUST in order to get the tire temps, brake temps, traction and transitional handling up to a level that ensures predictable behavior.
Not saying an enthusiast jumping in the deep end with one of these couldn't go very easy, just saying it wouldn't be very much fun, and it would entail some risk on-track. Now, get GOING and the car comes alive and actually drives better, with more predictible grip and braking power. Smoother, too.
The GT4 level cars (specifically the 981 and 718 GT4 ClubSports, less so for the RS ClubSport) are much more accommodating of the kind of casual use, even up to what most amateur drivers would consider significant pace, that they're likely to see at track days, club days and DE use. Definitely lower maintenance and longer intervals between component lifing. Even though the 981 GT4 CS series are getting on in years, they still hold up well.
As pointed out, the GT4 car is a great training ground for the "big" car, which is basically a GT3 (worldwide specification) one make car without BoP restrictions.
I see a fair number of self-maintained (at the track, sent to shops periodically) GT4 cars and a few previous gen GT3 Cups at the track. David, Erez and Kevin go (or will go) to the track with minimal support and on their own in their 992 GT3 Cups, but all three have some significant experience in street/factory-built racing Porsches, and all three of their cars will spend many more hours on the car in the garage or shop for every hour they're on track.
Good luck!
There are factors that I didn’t considered before. Now that I know and think more about it, even if the GT3 Cup is equally “low” maintenance, it’s a bit too much car for my use case.
Clubsport is likely the sweet spot. Granted “mellow might not be the best way to describe it. A better way to convey it is probably harmony between car’s natural pace, driver’s capabilities, and safety margin. My plan is arriving at a friendly chassis setup, consistent & long lasting tires matched to track conditions (not necessarily looking for the quickest tires), refresh my own driving skills to lap at a healthy pace (fast enough to be exciting and well matched to the car with good safety margin).
How does the Clubsport behave on tires like Hoosiers? Is that setup a “bad” idea (meaning the chassis cannot be tuned to work well with the tires)? Within the operating envelope, I’m looking for ways to “slow” the car down if that makes sense.
#35
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Totally makes sense. I’m optimizing for something slightly different though. The high rpm emotional aspect is worth it to me. Agree that a used 718CS is much cheaper and does the job just fine.
#36
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have a clubsport, a 964rs and a 914 with a 6.
The clubsport is fun if you make hot laps, you have to record laptimes, otherwise for me its meaningless.
If you want To have fun buy a 914 with a 6. Best there is
The clubsport is fun if you make hot laps, you have to record laptimes, otherwise for me its meaningless.
If you want To have fun buy a 914 with a 6. Best there is
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The following users liked this post:
whojoemama (02-24-2022)
#37
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thank you! Exactly the sort of nuances that I’m hoping to get from experts here.
There are factors that I didn’t considered before. Now that I know and think more about it, even if the GT3 Cup is equally “low” maintenance, it’s a bit too much car for my use case.
Clubsport is likely the sweet spot. Granted “mellow might not be the best way to describe it. A better way to convey it is probably harmony between car’s natural pace, driver’s capabilities, and safety margin. My plan is arriving at a friendly chassis setup, consistent & long lasting tires matched to track conditions (not necessarily looking for the quickest tires), refresh my own driving skills to lap at a healthy pace (fast enough to be exciting and well matched to the car with good safety margin).
How does the Clubsport behave on tires like Hoosiers? Is that setup a “bad” idea (meaning the chassis cannot be tuned to work well with the tires)? Within the operating envelope, I’m looking for ways to “slow” the car down if that makes sense.
There are factors that I didn’t considered before. Now that I know and think more about it, even if the GT3 Cup is equally “low” maintenance, it’s a bit too much car for my use case.
Clubsport is likely the sweet spot. Granted “mellow might not be the best way to describe it. A better way to convey it is probably harmony between car’s natural pace, driver’s capabilities, and safety margin. My plan is arriving at a friendly chassis setup, consistent & long lasting tires matched to track conditions (not necessarily looking for the quickest tires), refresh my own driving skills to lap at a healthy pace (fast enough to be exciting and well matched to the car with good safety margin).
How does the Clubsport behave on tires like Hoosiers? Is that setup a “bad” idea (meaning the chassis cannot be tuned to work well with the tires)? Within the operating envelope, I’m looking for ways to “slow” the car down if that makes sense.
What does "long lasting tires" mean to you? There should be a couple of tire threads here if you search. It's speculation though at this point for an RS Clubsport. That said I recall some 981 GT4 owners running 200TW DOT tires as required by endurance racing series rules. The most common tire I see used is the Pirelli DH on 981 and 718. I ran a set of R7 for the heck of it. I put about 12 heat cycles in them. They were pretty terrible at the end. To be fair I didn't do an initial cycle and then let them sit as recommended by Hoosier. At the time they were not a lot cheaper than slicks.
#38
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Cool](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
#39
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What does "long lasting tires" mean to you? There should be a couple of tire threads here if you search. It's speculation though at this point for an RS Clubsport. That said I recall some 981 GT4 owners running 200TW DOT tires as required by endurance racing series rules. The most common tire I see used is the Pirelli DH on 981 and 718. I ran a set of R7 for the heck of it. I put about 12 heat cycles in them. They were pretty terrible at the end. To be fair I didn't do an initial cycle and then let them sit as recommended by Hoosier. At the time they were not a lot cheaper than slicks.
I will go study some of the threads on tires. Thanks.
#40
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,965
Received 3,058 Likes
on
1,793 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think tires are perhaps the most important single component to lap times.
I know the driver's comfort and confidence level in any car is the single key performance indicator predicating the level of commitment required to improve.
I also believe that the adoption of sub-par tires, or tires that the car (especially a homologated package, like any of the factory built GT3 and GT4 cars) has not been SPECIFICALLY designed around, not only takes away from the experience and performance but also from the confidence the driver NEEDS in order to push incrementally and gain that performance.
While I understand the 200 TW tires are required for some budget endurance series the new cars are eligible for, to get the most benefit out of them (and to reduce the potential for thermally induced failure), significant changes will be needed to the shocks, springs, bars and alignment settings.
A GT4 car is a "package," designed and built by the manufacturer to compete against other cars worldwide built to the same homologated standard.
When the 981 GT4 ClubSport was introduced and PCA Club Racing mandated the use of the Pirelli DH in Trophy East in 2016, after the car had been designed around, optimized for and delivered with Michelins (with a lower spring rate by some margin than the Pirellis), early testing and some of the early events had a high casualty rate due to how difficult it was to keep the rear under the car. So much so, two softer spring rates were immediately introduced and implemented by the series to try and tame the car, which had shown NO signs of issues testing on the Michelins.
All I can tell you is that the car, especially this one, is a "system," a "package" that works harmoniously together. Change the tires to Pirelli DH (less so), Hoosier R7 (more so) or 200 TW (for SURE), especially without a concerted effort by a knowledgeable engineer or engineers with substantial data, is just compromising that package, inhibiting the balance and consistency of the package, damaging the performance of the package as well as hurting your investment and return.
Most drivers won't push hard enough for the car to push back, especially on DH's, but when it does, you better be ready. Black, round and rubber are not all the same.
The four contact patches are your only connection with Mother Earth...
I know the driver's comfort and confidence level in any car is the single key performance indicator predicating the level of commitment required to improve.
I also believe that the adoption of sub-par tires, or tires that the car (especially a homologated package, like any of the factory built GT3 and GT4 cars) has not been SPECIFICALLY designed around, not only takes away from the experience and performance but also from the confidence the driver NEEDS in order to push incrementally and gain that performance.
While I understand the 200 TW tires are required for some budget endurance series the new cars are eligible for, to get the most benefit out of them (and to reduce the potential for thermally induced failure), significant changes will be needed to the shocks, springs, bars and alignment settings.
A GT4 car is a "package," designed and built by the manufacturer to compete against other cars worldwide built to the same homologated standard.
When the 981 GT4 ClubSport was introduced and PCA Club Racing mandated the use of the Pirelli DH in Trophy East in 2016, after the car had been designed around, optimized for and delivered with Michelins (with a lower spring rate by some margin than the Pirellis), early testing and some of the early events had a high casualty rate due to how difficult it was to keep the rear under the car. So much so, two softer spring rates were immediately introduced and implemented by the series to try and tame the car, which had shown NO signs of issues testing on the Michelins.
All I can tell you is that the car, especially this one, is a "system," a "package" that works harmoniously together. Change the tires to Pirelli DH (less so), Hoosier R7 (more so) or 200 TW (for SURE), especially without a concerted effort by a knowledgeable engineer or engineers with substantial data, is just compromising that package, inhibiting the balance and consistency of the package, damaging the performance of the package as well as hurting your investment and return.
Most drivers won't push hard enough for the car to push back, especially on DH's, but when it does, you better be ready. Black, round and rubber are not all the same.
The four contact patches are your only connection with Mother Earth...
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
The following users liked this post:
whojoemama (02-24-2022)
#41
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think tires are perhaps the most important single component to lap times.
I know the driver's comfort and confidence level in any car is the single key performance indicator predicating the level of commitment required to improve.
I also believe that the adoption of sub-par tires, or tires that the car (especially a homologated package, like any of the factory built GT3 and GT4 cars) has not been SPECIFICALLY designed around, not only takes away from the experience and performance but also from the confidence the driver NEEDS in order to push incrementally and gain that performance.
While I understand the 200 TW tires are required for some budget endurance series the new cars are eligible for, to get the most benefit out of them (and to reduce the potential for thermally induced failure), significant changes will be needed to the shocks, springs, bars and alignment settings.
A GT4 car is a "package," designed and built by the manufacturer to compete against other cars worldwide built to the same homologated standard.
When the 981 GT4 ClubSport was introduced and PCA Club Racing mandated the use of the Pirelli DH in Trophy East in 2016, after the car had been designed around, optimized for and delivered with Michelins (with a lower spring rate by some margin than the Pirellis), early testing and some of the early events had a high casualty rate due to how difficult it was to keep the rear under the car. So much so, two softer spring rates were immediately introduced and implemented by the series to try and tame the car, which had shown NO signs of issues testing on the Michelins.
All I can tell you is that the car, especially this one, is a "system," a "package" that works harmoniously together. Change the tires to Pirelli DH (less so), Hoosier R7 (more so) or 200 TW (for SURE), especially without a concerted effort by a knowledgeable engineer or engineers with substantial data, is just compromising that package, inhibiting the balance and consistency of the package, damaging the performance of the package as well as hurting your investment and return.
Most drivers won't push hard enough for the car to push back, especially on DH's, but when it does, you better be ready. Black, round and rubber are not all the same.
The four contact patches are your only connection with Mother Earth...
I know the driver's comfort and confidence level in any car is the single key performance indicator predicating the level of commitment required to improve.
I also believe that the adoption of sub-par tires, or tires that the car (especially a homologated package, like any of the factory built GT3 and GT4 cars) has not been SPECIFICALLY designed around, not only takes away from the experience and performance but also from the confidence the driver NEEDS in order to push incrementally and gain that performance.
While I understand the 200 TW tires are required for some budget endurance series the new cars are eligible for, to get the most benefit out of them (and to reduce the potential for thermally induced failure), significant changes will be needed to the shocks, springs, bars and alignment settings.
A GT4 car is a "package," designed and built by the manufacturer to compete against other cars worldwide built to the same homologated standard.
When the 981 GT4 ClubSport was introduced and PCA Club Racing mandated the use of the Pirelli DH in Trophy East in 2016, after the car had been designed around, optimized for and delivered with Michelins (with a lower spring rate by some margin than the Pirellis), early testing and some of the early events had a high casualty rate due to how difficult it was to keep the rear under the car. So much so, two softer spring rates were immediately introduced and implemented by the series to try and tame the car, which had shown NO signs of issues testing on the Michelins.
All I can tell you is that the car, especially this one, is a "system," a "package" that works harmoniously together. Change the tires to Pirelli DH (less so), Hoosier R7 (more so) or 200 TW (for SURE), especially without a concerted effort by a knowledgeable engineer or engineers with substantial data, is just compromising that package, inhibiting the balance and consistency of the package, damaging the performance of the package as well as hurting your investment and return.
Most drivers won't push hard enough for the car to push back, especially on DH's, but when it does, you better be ready. Black, round and rubber are not all the same.
The four contact patches are your only connection with Mother Earth...
My current thinking is, I will run the tires the car is designed for.
#42
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,965
Received 3,058 Likes
on
1,793 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
One of the hardest things to get a handle on is the extreme difference in performance between "cold" slicks and those same tires in the proper operating range.
Driving "cold" slicks (Michelin S8M, N2, N3, Hankook F200 or Pirelli DH, for example) can be diabolical, coming from R7's or even street tires. The accelerative and braking traction, not to mention the turning capability, is severely compromised when below 140 degrees, so much so, you could easily be surprised by the lack of grip turning into the first corner after leaving the pit lane exit. Many less experienced drivers are spooked by the experience and don't trust these tires, nor can they easily bring themselves to wail on them hard enough to get temperature into them QUICKLY, knowing that the car will be sliding around at insanely low and then only medium speeds. So, they go back to the known quantity, something like the R7 or PSC2, which is not what these cars are designed for.
There's the rub. To get them working, aggressive acceleration and braking are needed. Side to side only knocks debris off the tread face. Fore/aft moves the belts in the carcass internally to build temperature (and as a result, pressure) up quickly, evenly and from the inside out to the tread face. Also, heating up the brakes and wheels can help bring temps and pressures up. When I listen to pros leaving pit lane in a car on slicks, there's no mercy. But they know the tires will be sub-bar until they get up to temp, generally between 170-210 degrees F. When done right, they can BE at temperature, from 70 degrees leaving the pits, to 165-170 degrees in one lap on a longer, faster course. Then, only a few more corners and they're right in the window.
I do think people don't read the instructions or speak to a lot of the more experienced dealers for specific information on the use and care enough. Proper break-in of slick tires can double or even triple their useful life. Also, the number one way to tell that they are past their prime is a LOSS OF BALANCE on one end of the car, not a global, gradual loss of grip, the latter much harder to evaluate and quantify.
Have fun, all of these factory built cars are simply marvelous tools to hone your craft!
The following 2 users liked this post by ProCoach:
TMANN (02-25-2022),
WhiteMolar (04-12-2022)
#43
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I will chime in with my 2 cents, for whatever it is worth.
I have been running a 2016 GT3RS at track days for the last year. Best lap times include consistent 2:13s at Sebring, 1:57s at VIR, and 2:02s at the Glen (so much more time to find, especially at the Glen) on Hankook slicks F200. I want to go racing so my best option is a 981 CS. I rented one for half of a day at Sebring and my mind was blown. I did not want to like the CS for so many reasons; its not a 911, its not as "fast as the RS", etc. Well in my second session in the car, I did a 2:14 at Sebring on Hankook slicks F200, and again, so much more time to find with just seat time, let alone a coach. The lack of straight line speed in the CS is more than made up for by its cornering abilities. And then there are the sensations; the rawness of a purpose built race car. No sound deadening material, carpet, etc. Mechanical brakes and no rubber bushings will give you all the feedback you need to go faster. What an experience. Needless to say, my CS is in transport now.
I have been running a 2016 GT3RS at track days for the last year. Best lap times include consistent 2:13s at Sebring, 1:57s at VIR, and 2:02s at the Glen (so much more time to find, especially at the Glen) on Hankook slicks F200. I want to go racing so my best option is a 981 CS. I rented one for half of a day at Sebring and my mind was blown. I did not want to like the CS for so many reasons; its not a 911, its not as "fast as the RS", etc. Well in my second session in the car, I did a 2:14 at Sebring on Hankook slicks F200, and again, so much more time to find with just seat time, let alone a coach. The lack of straight line speed in the CS is more than made up for by its cornering abilities. And then there are the sensations; the rawness of a purpose built race car. No sound deadening material, carpet, etc. Mechanical brakes and no rubber bushings will give you all the feedback you need to go faster. What an experience. Needless to say, my CS is in transport now.
#44
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,965
Received 3,058 Likes
on
1,793 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I will chime in with my 2 cents, for whatever it is worth.
I have been running a 2016 GT3RS at track days for the last year. Best lap times include consistent 2:13s at Sebring, 1:57s at VIR, and 2:02s at the Glen (so much more time to find, especially at the Glen) on Hankook slicks F200. I want to go racing so my best option is a 981 CS. I rented one for half of a day at Sebring and my mind was blown. I did not want to like the CS for so many reasons; its not a 911, its not as "fast as the RS", etc. Well in my second session in the car, I did a 2:14 at Sebring on Hankook slicks F200, and again, so much more time to find with just seat time, let alone a coach. The lack of straight line speed in the CS is more than made up for by its cornering abilities. And then there are the sensations; the rawness of a purpose built race car. No sound deadening material, carpet, etc. Mechanical brakes and no rubber bushings will give you all the feedback you need to go faster. What an experience. Needless to say, my CS is in transport now.
I have been running a 2016 GT3RS at track days for the last year. Best lap times include consistent 2:13s at Sebring, 1:57s at VIR, and 2:02s at the Glen (so much more time to find, especially at the Glen) on Hankook slicks F200. I want to go racing so my best option is a 981 CS. I rented one for half of a day at Sebring and my mind was blown. I did not want to like the CS for so many reasons; its not a 911, its not as "fast as the RS", etc. Well in my second session in the car, I did a 2:14 at Sebring on Hankook slicks F200, and again, so much more time to find with just seat time, let alone a coach. The lack of straight line speed in the CS is more than made up for by its cornering abilities. And then there are the sensations; the rawness of a purpose built race car. No sound deadening material, carpet, etc. Mechanical brakes and no rubber bushings will give you all the feedback you need to go faster. What an experience. Needless to say, my CS is in transport now.
Where is the "love" button?
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Awesome post.
#45
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Does the Clubsport come with in cockpit tire temperature readings? Or is it a go by feel thing?