Will Porsche ever walk back it commitment to hybridization/electrification?
#226
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,372
Received 2,903 Likes
on
1,531 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Notice how none of the EV fans want to talk about the terrible mining pollution needed to make their cars?
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2...epage-americas
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2...epage-americas
Those Borneo burn-off's by the way are largely to prepare old-growth areas for palm oil plantings. You likely use Palm Oil every day in a huge range of products, Indonesia is the worlds largest producer of that as well.
Last edited by aggie57; 06-18-2024 at 05:47 PM.
#227
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Let's face it, humans (meaning, me, you, and everyone else on this thread) pollute.
That's true whether you drive an EV, ICE, hybrid, or all three. Heck, you'll even pollute even if you just walk everywhere.
At this point, it's just a matter of degree -- i.e., not "if" but "how much" -- humans pollute.
Do EVs make more of a difference in the long run than a comparable ICE car?
Who knows, but in the long run the biggest difference maker is going to be humans.
And as humans, we can either choose to make that "long run" longer, or shorter.
But I am willing to bet that in the long run EVs will make a marginally more significant difference than just driving ICE cars.
Unless of course one thinks this whole EV thing is a conspiracy amongst all the major countries in the world and all of those countries' leaders.
And if you believe that, there's really nothing more to discuss.
There's no point in further discussions. In anything, really.
That's true whether you drive an EV, ICE, hybrid, or all three. Heck, you'll even pollute even if you just walk everywhere.
At this point, it's just a matter of degree -- i.e., not "if" but "how much" -- humans pollute.
Do EVs make more of a difference in the long run than a comparable ICE car?
Who knows, but in the long run the biggest difference maker is going to be humans.
And as humans, we can either choose to make that "long run" longer, or shorter.
But I am willing to bet that in the long run EVs will make a marginally more significant difference than just driving ICE cars.
Unless of course one thinks this whole EV thing is a conspiracy amongst all the major countries in the world and all of those countries' leaders.
And if you believe that, there's really nothing more to discuss.
There's no point in further discussions. In anything, really.
Last edited by ipse dixit; 06-18-2024 at 06:16 PM.
#228
Racer
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Let's face it, humans (meaning, me, you, and everyone else on this thread) pollute.
That's true whether you drive an EV, ICE, hybrid, or all three. Heck, you'll even pollute even if you just walk everywhere.
At this point, it's just a matter of degree -- i.e., not "if" but "how much" -- humans pollute.
Do EVs make more of a difference in the long run than a comparable ICE car?
Who knows, but in the long run the biggest difference maker is going to be humans.
And as humans, we can either choose to make that "long run" longer, or shorter.
But I am willing to bet that in the long run EVs will make a marginally more significant difference than just driving ICE cars.
Unless of course one thinks this whole EV thing is a conspiracy amongst all the major countries in the world and all of those countries' leaders.
And if you believe that, there's really nothing more to discuss.
There's no point in further discussions. In anything, really.
That's true whether you drive an EV, ICE, hybrid, or all three. Heck, you'll even pollute even if you just walk everywhere.
At this point, it's just a matter of degree -- i.e., not "if" but "how much" -- humans pollute.
Do EVs make more of a difference in the long run than a comparable ICE car?
Who knows, but in the long run the biggest difference maker is going to be humans.
And as humans, we can either choose to make that "long run" longer, or shorter.
But I am willing to bet that in the long run EVs will make a marginally more significant difference than just driving ICE cars.
Unless of course one thinks this whole EV thing is a conspiracy amongst all the major countries in the world and all of those countries' leaders.
And if you believe that, there's really nothing more to discuss.
There's no point in further discussions. In anything, really.
The following users liked this post:
M3Inline6 (06-18-2024)
#229
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,372
Received 2,903 Likes
on
1,531 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Let's face it, humans (meaning, me, you, and everyone else on this thread) pollute.
That's true whether you drive an EV, ICE, hybrid, or all three. Heck, you'll even pollute even if you just walk everywhere.
At this point, it's just a matter of degree -- i.e., not "if" but "how much" -- humans pollute.
Do EVs make more of a difference in the long run than a comparable ICE car?
Who knows, but in the long run the biggest difference maker is going to be humans.
And as humans, we can either choose to make that "long run" longer, or shorter.
But I am willing to bet that in the long run EVs will make a marginally more significant difference than just driving ICE cars.
Unless of course one thinks this whole EV thing is a conspiracy amongst all the major countries in the world and all of those countries' leaders.
And if you believe that, there's really nothing more to discuss.
There's no point in further discussions. In anything, really.
That's true whether you drive an EV, ICE, hybrid, or all three. Heck, you'll even pollute even if you just walk everywhere.
At this point, it's just a matter of degree -- i.e., not "if" but "how much" -- humans pollute.
Do EVs make more of a difference in the long run than a comparable ICE car?
Who knows, but in the long run the biggest difference maker is going to be humans.
And as humans, we can either choose to make that "long run" longer, or shorter.
But I am willing to bet that in the long run EVs will make a marginally more significant difference than just driving ICE cars.
Unless of course one thinks this whole EV thing is a conspiracy amongst all the major countries in the world and all of those countries' leaders.
And if you believe that, there's really nothing more to discuss.
There's no point in further discussions. In anything, really.
#231
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I continue to believe in Toyota's "all of the above" approach. This also includes new/innovative technologies, and ways to make some current technologies cost effective (e.g. hydrogen). The problem I have is with the Al Gores and John Kerrys of the world, whose carbon footprint is a large as some small countries. Despite this, they feel the need to tell the whole world to do as they say not as they do. In the long run the market will sort out the best/most effective technologies without heavy handed political interference.
But that said, why let personal animosity get in the way of actual facts?
#232
Racer
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The actual facts are that China and India continue to build hundreds of unscrubbed coal plants each year, generating enormous amounts of additional pollution. Stop that and you will stop most of the increase in global emissions. EV's just don't make that much of a difference. For example, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute recently calculated that California's proposed move to ban diesel locomotives in the state would reduce global temperatures in 2100 by 0.000063 degrees Celsius. Additionally, zero emission locomotives would require batteries 6 to 10 times bigger than those that are available today. They also don't work well in cold temperatures like we experience in the Sierra Nevada mountains every winter. The likely result would be more freight moving by trucks, as if we don't have a congestion problem already. This is a perfect example of the unintended consequences of virtue signaling politicians who don't have a clue how the real world works.
The following 2 users liked this post by jmrichards:
George from MD (06-18-2024),
M3Inline6 (06-18-2024)
#233
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The actual facts are that China and India continue to build hundreds of unscrubbed coal plants each year, generating enormous amounts of additional pollution. Stop that and you will stop most of the increase in global emissions. EV's just don't make that much of a difference. For example, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute recently calculated that California's proposed move to ban diesel locomotives in the state would reduce global temperatures in 2100 by 0.000063 degrees Celsius. Additionally, zero emission locomotives would require batteries 6 to 10 times bigger than those that are available today. They also don't work well in cold temperatures like we experience in the Sierra Nevada mountains every winter. The likely result would be more freight moving by trucks, as if we don't have a congestion problem already. This is a perfect example of the unintended consequences of virtue signaling politicians who don't have a clue how the real world works.
The following users liked this post:
George from MD (06-18-2024)
#234
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,372
Received 2,903 Likes
on
1,531 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"For example, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute recently calculated that California's proposed move to ban diesel locomotives in the state would reduce global temperatures in 2100 by 0.000063 degrees Celsius."
The bigger issue for the railroads by 2100 is likely to be actually getting diesel fuel, at least enough of it operate a railroad.
The bigger issue for the railroads by 2100 is likely to be actually getting diesel fuel, at least enough of it operate a railroad.
#235
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This thread can officially be shut down. lol.
The following users liked this post:
aggie57 (06-18-2024)
#236
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You might be surprised, but I agree with everything you said.
It might interest you to know that 100% of the EV owners I know, also have one, or more ICE cars. In fact, I think a recent survey showed that most EV owners also drive ICE…but for short trips around town, nothing beats an EV.
Not too long ago I was conversing with one of the journalists/writers at MotorTrend. he had written an article (as all the media does) about “range anxiety”…and i responded by telling him that about 80% of EV owners also own an ICE car…as do I. So, long trips, or when driving through states with minimal charging infrastructure, I take my ICE. No big deal. But the day-to-day driving is with an EV. Ergo, zero range anxiety.
I will also admit that when I drive my 911, it does bring a huge smile to my face. So, there is a place in my garage for the right ICE car….just as there is space in my garage for an EV.
It might interest you to know that 100% of the EV owners I know, also have one, or more ICE cars. In fact, I think a recent survey showed that most EV owners also drive ICE…but for short trips around town, nothing beats an EV.
Not too long ago I was conversing with one of the journalists/writers at MotorTrend. he had written an article (as all the media does) about “range anxiety”…and i responded by telling him that about 80% of EV owners also own an ICE car…as do I. So, long trips, or when driving through states with minimal charging infrastructure, I take my ICE. No big deal. But the day-to-day driving is with an EV. Ergo, zero range anxiety.
I will also admit that when I drive my 911, it does bring a huge smile to my face. So, there is a place in my garage for the right ICE car….just as there is space in my garage for an EV.
#237
Racer
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm a big fan of your posts, and I agree with 99% of what you're saying... so good for you for standing up to the crowd. EVs are better technology - they just are - the infrastructure is not there yet and that is the problem. Plus it's a very, very small f*** you to the Saudis every time I get in my beautiful Taycan. I hate having to cowtow to those who brought us 9/11 and bonesaws just so our gas prices stay stable. If you're a true American, you want energy independence from the entire middle east.
#238
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So weird... it's like we still have to cowtow to the Saudis and OPEC in order to keep oil prices within a range acceptable to all the ICE owners who winge and moan any time the price of a gallon goes above a dollar certain amount. For all of your "energy independence" American politics and the energy economy has a funny way of countering it.
Also, fracking is destroying the lands where it occurs, but sure. Oil is a stupid way to make a car move forward when electricity is available to the same job.
And I make enough money not to give a **** whether my Taycan depreciates. It's the best car that I've ever owned and a technological marvel. If you actually view a 911 as an investment, God help you - cars are meant to be driven.
Also, fracking is destroying the lands where it occurs, but sure. Oil is a stupid way to make a car move forward when electricity is available to the same job.
And I make enough money not to give a **** whether my Taycan depreciates. It's the best car that I've ever owned and a technological marvel. If you actually view a 911 as an investment, God help you - cars are meant to be driven.
#239
Racer
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So weird... it's like we still have to cowtow to the Saudis and OPEC in order to keep oil prices within a range acceptable to all the ICE owners who winge and moan any time the price of a gallon goes above a dollar certain amount. For all of your "energy independence" American politics and the energy economy has a funny way of countering it.
Also, fracking is destroying the lands where it occurs, but sure. Oil is a stupid way to make a car move forward when electricity is available to the same job.
And I make enough money not to give a **** whether my Taycan depreciates. It's the best car that I've ever owned and a technological marvel. If you actually view a 911 as an investment, God help you - cars are meant to be driven.
Also, fracking is destroying the lands where it occurs, but sure. Oil is a stupid way to make a car move forward when electricity is available to the same job.
And I make enough money not to give a **** whether my Taycan depreciates. It's the best car that I've ever owned and a technological marvel. If you actually view a 911 as an investment, God help you - cars are meant to be driven.
The following users liked this post:
M3Inline6 (06-19-2024)
#240
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,372
Received 2,903 Likes
on
1,531 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wow. Rich and stupid. Most people actually want to do more than virtue signal with their EVs. Using slave labor to mine minerals that make your insignificant contribution to reducing emissions must make you feel better. I drive my 911 every day and am looking for a good Ferrari F12 for weekend drives. Look into the unbelievable environmental destruction the Chinese are doing to provide you with your precious EV materials. Rich and stupid is no way to go through life.