Notices
Cayenne 955-957 2003-2010 1st Generation
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

VR6 to Turbo? Thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2023 | 05:54 PM
  #1  
955_EXP's Avatar
955_EXP
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default VR6 to Turbo? Thoughts?

So i own a 05 VR6, about 108k on the clock, standard base model with the panoramic roof (i love this). Went to day to check out a Turbo same year, drove really nice, seems in good shape but has 180k on the clock, guy asked for a trade, im considering it but a little nervous with the mileage.

Just wondering what you guys think about this? How reliable is the turbo at this mileage? think its worth it? i might be letting my emotions get involved in this one.

Old 01-03-2023 | 12:54 AM
  #2  
955_EXP's Avatar
955_EXP
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Any thoughts?
Old 01-03-2023 | 02:06 AM
  #3  
19psi's Avatar
19psi
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 161
From: NW Indiana
Default

Your VR6 is bullet proof and will go many more miles. The turbo with 180K miles is used up.
It's less likely to be one of the bad engines that bore score, but 180K seems to be prime mileage for losing a valve which also destroys the engine. How much life does the timing chain and tensioners have left? Have you seen what's involved in replacing those? Forget about the engine for a minute...what about every other moving part? Transmission, transfer case, differentials, CV joints, wheel bearings, entire suspension, motor mounts, alternator, A/C compressor, power steering pump, etc.
To buy it for a 2nd fun vehicle, yeah no problem. If it's going to replace your current reliable Cayenne and be a daily driver, hell no.

Every car forum has a couple of members that will chime in and tell you how their crazy high mileage car is awesome...click on their profile and skim through their posts. You'll find they've put an ungodly amount of money and time into keeping their used up car on the road, but won't tell you about it.

Lastly, you have to wonder why he wants to trade his V8 turbo for your base 6 cylinder?


Last edited by 19psi; 01-03-2023 at 02:10 AM.
The following users liked this post:
v10rick (01-03-2023)
Old 01-03-2023 | 08:15 AM
  #4  
v10rick's Avatar
v10rick
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 99
From: Bluemont VA
Default

Might be okay if you have an unlimited budget and are prepared to wrench on the Cayenne yourself.

If not run away from this deal.

Last edited by v10rick; 01-03-2023 at 08:21 AM.
The following users liked this post:
19psi (01-03-2023)
Old 01-03-2023 | 09:18 AM
  #5  
Petza914's Avatar
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 26,442
Likes: 6,848
From: Clemson, SC
Default

That 189k mileage is getting into the everything that hasn't been replaced yet will need to be. I bought my 09 Turbo S with 28k miles on it in 2016 and it has 48k on it now. Has been flawless, but really only does highway trips and really is only used about 5 times a year, so in a very different mileage category and use case then what you're talking about. I wanted years of trouble-free ownership and why I searched for a super.low.mileage one when buying.

The turbo power makes it feel like a completely different car than the V6 if you drive it to take advantage of the power. If you want to make that move, I'd find a much lower.mileage example.
The following users liked this post:
19psi (01-03-2023)
Old 01-03-2023 | 01:08 PM
  #6  
matthew.a.tanner's Avatar
matthew.a.tanner
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 155
Likes: 38
Default

I think the v6 is the smarter play, but if we only made logically choices, everyone would drive a Toyota. I also believe...the turbo is a million mile vehicle (highest I've seen is 600k)...just needs maintenance. I personally wouldn't bat an eye purchasing a 955/957 with 200, 300, 400k miles...for the right price...your tolerance for risk may be different. I'll also say...my daily driver is a Honda for reliability.
Old 01-03-2023 | 04:01 PM
  #7  
955_EXP's Avatar
955_EXP
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Thanks for the responses, I've felt that the vr6 is the better option, as both cars are getting old and maintenance on mine would be better. Emotions are getting the best of me as this car does drive nicely.

Ill do the maintenance myself but im more worried about the bigger stuff down the line alongside with much more parts on the turbo, it could be a headache. But by gosh the drive was nice. the vr6 is the sensible option for sure!

The car wouldn't be a daily, as i ride a bike to work, sometimes i drive. but i do intend on going places with it. Tough one!
Old 01-03-2023 | 06:21 PM
  #8  
MM951's Avatar
MM951
Race Director
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,607
Likes: 49
From: Hudson Valley
Default

Get the Turbo.


Source: I've owned my 04 CTT from 80K to its current 275K. It is the best car I've owned to include many other Porsches (still own 3)

Last edited by MM951; 01-03-2023 at 06:22 PM.
Old 01-03-2023 | 06:43 PM
  #9  
19psi's Avatar
19psi
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 161
From: NW Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by MM951
Get the Turbo.


Source: I've owned my 04 CTT from 80K to its current 275K. It is the best car I've owned to include many other Porsches (still own 3)
How did you solve your scored cylinder #6 you posted about back in 2018?
Old 01-03-2023 | 07:18 PM
  #10  
955_EXP's Avatar
955_EXP
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by MM951
Get the Turbo.


Source: I've owned my 04 CTT from 80K to its current 275K. It is the best car I've owned to include many other Porsches (still own 3)
Did you ever have many issue in one go?

Old 01-03-2023 | 07:35 PM
  #11  
matthew.a.tanner's Avatar
matthew.a.tanner
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 155
Likes: 38
Default

Have you considered just buying the turbo…and keeping the vr6….it’s what makes the most sense :-)
Old 01-03-2023 | 08:04 PM
  #12  
955_EXP's Avatar
955_EXP
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by matthew.a.tanner
Have you considered just buying the turbo…and keeping the vr6….it’s what makes the most sense :-)
would love too, but dont have the space :/
Old 01-04-2023 | 05:47 PM
  #13  
MM951's Avatar
MM951
Race Director
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,607
Likes: 49
From: Hudson Valley
Default

Originally Posted by 19psi
How did you solve your scored cylinder #6 you posted about back in 2018?
It's not scored - internet hype got me all paranoid
Old 01-04-2023 | 05:49 PM
  #14  
MM951's Avatar
MM951
Race Director
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,607
Likes: 49
From: Hudson Valley
Default

Originally Posted by 955_EXP
Did you ever have many issue in one go?
The only real headache was the alternator at ~150K miles - not difficult just required more patience than most jobs. Coolant T's were a piece of cake. Valve cover gaskets are also a piece of cake. Sure I've replaced plenty of the crappy plastic tubing but they aren't expensive from FCP Euro and carry a lifetime warranty. Change the ignition coils every 40-50K and inspect engine bay wiring/anything plastic and you'll be fine. Obviously things break sometimes but they are all easily dealt with - and it's not like the VR6 is immune from needing driveshafts, coils, random emission stuff. I had my little brother get a base 957 and I cursed that suggestion when I was replacing his PCV valve - and all the other common Cayenne issues.

Last edited by MM951; 01-04-2023 at 05:57 PM.
The following users liked this post:
955_EXP (01-05-2023)
Old 01-04-2023 | 06:52 PM
  #15  
mrdstr's Avatar
mrdstr
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 148
Likes: 46
From: Hillsboro, OR
Default

if it helps, we also have an 05 VR6. Had is since 2009 and ~44000 miles and it now has 195000 miles on it. It is a manual, so that definitely helps keep it fun and keep it around. This year was my biggest maintenance year as a result of numerous failures (TStat housing, fuel pumps, and head unit). I do all the work on it, so went after the entire cooling system minus the radiator and coolant reservoir. Did the valve cover gasket since the valve cover had to come off to get to the tstat housing. Also did upper and lower control arms, tie rod ends, and new Bilsteins all around (i'm on steel springs) as the front bushings were shot (second time I have done lowers) and the shocks were a bit tired. And brakes this year as well. Went high end on the stereo install/upgrade and had MusicarNW do what they do. But all of this is "normal" for cars that are over 15 years old and have 200k miles on them. This is not our only Porsche. I will tell you that if you drive them and look after them, they are no worse than any other car and often I find the parts, while expensive, are better engineered and last longer than other makes. You know the history on yours and you don't drive it daily. I would keep it. If you buy any car more than 10 years old, regardless of mileage, you will have brittle plastics, old electronics, and worn rubber pieces that could all use a refresh. So if you go the Turbo route, don't be upset or surprised if the bills start coming in for all the refresh that may be needed. The one thing I do wish the VR6 had is more power. Drove a GTS manual and the brakes and steering felt over assisted compared to our little base VR6. The Vr6 felt like more the drivers car to me. Good luck with your dilemma.
The following users liked this post:
955_EXP (01-05-2023)


Quick Reply: VR6 to Turbo? Thoughts?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:10 PM.