Notices
Cayenne 955-957 2003-2010 1st Generation
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

For those of you considering "upgrading" to a 2011+

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2018, 11:11 PM
  #31  
garrett376
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
garrett376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,275
Received 563 Likes on 430 Posts
Default

958 tows just as well as a 957, maybe better thanks to things like Adaptive Cruise Control (only available on the 958) and better gas mileage (on the 958) and the 958's LED tolerance. A 958's interior is too nice to cut up and it has a knee airbag, so I needed a Prodigy RF when I got the 958, but that's not a big deal.

The 958 is fantastic off-road - I actually prefer it to my prior 957. The 958 will go anywhere a similarly equipped 955/957 will go, and there are more 958's with locking rear differentials than there are 957/955's, so it's possible a 958 may be able to go further than 955/957's...
Old 02-23-2018, 04:17 PM
  #32  
nodoors
Three Wheelin'
 
nodoors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,682
Received 65 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garrett376
The 958 will go anywhere a similarly equipped 955/957 will go, and there are more 958's with locking rear differentials than there are 957/955's, so it's possible a 958 may be able to go further than 955/957's...
So basically you are saying the low range transfer case is an entirely unnecessary feature and all engineers, manufacturers, and offroaders to date have just been confused about that?
Old 02-23-2018, 04:43 PM
  #33  
deilenberger
Banned
 
deilenberger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Spring Lake, NJ, US of A
Posts: 10,085
Received 1,141 Likes on 758 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nodoors
So basically you are saying the low range transfer case is an entirely unnecessary feature and all engineers, manufacturers, and offroaders to date have just been confused about that?
Since the 958 starts out in 1st gear (unlike a 955/957) and it's a low first gear - a low range probably would be unnecessary. When the 955/057 was first engineered (think back in 1999/2000 probably) - a 6 speed transmission was as good as it got. Since the 958 got an 8 speed - that allowed Porsche to use a lower 1st gear and eliminate the need for a low range transfer case, which on probably 99.9% of the 955/957 Cayennes sold - was never used.
Old 02-23-2018, 05:06 PM
  #34  
oldskewel
Burning Brakes
 
oldskewel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,136
Received 130 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deilenberger
Since the 958 starts out in 1st gear (unlike a 955/957) and it's a low first gear - a low range probably would be unnecessary. When the 955/057 was first engineered (think back in 1999/2000 probably) - a 6 speed transmission was as good as it got. Since the 958 got an 8 speed - that allowed Porsche to use a lower 1st gear and eliminate the need for a low range transfer case, which on probably 99.9% of the 955/957 Cayennes sold - was never used.
My 955 (2004 S) starts in 2nd gear. Is something wrong? BTW, it also shifts really early. Driving like a granny (sorry, only as a test), on level ground, it will shift from 5th to 6th before 40 mph. Is that a problem too?
Old 02-23-2018, 05:10 PM
  #35  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,319
Received 6,172 Likes on 3,936 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldskewel
My 955 (2004 S) starts in 2nd gear. Is something wrong? BTW, it also shifts really early. Driving like a granny (sorry, only as a test), on level ground, it will shift from 5th to 6th before 40 mph. Is that a problem too?
That's normal behavior. You can push the Tip "-" button while at a light to make it start in first or if you have Sport mode, that will also make it start in first. When I get in my 957 Turbo S, I put it in Sport mode for the 1st gear start, but that also lowers it, so then I have to lift the air suspension back to Normal - wish there was a way to have it remember some of these parameters and make them the default like there is in the 958 from that aftermarket company
Old 02-23-2018, 05:33 PM
  #36  
oldskewel
Burning Brakes
 
oldskewel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,136
Received 130 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Yes, that's what I thought. I now see that I misread deilenberger's post. Don't know how I did that. I thought he was saying my 955 should start in 1, but clearly I just misread that.
Old 02-23-2018, 09:51 PM
  #37  
nodoors
Three Wheelin'
 
nodoors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,682
Received 65 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deilenberger
Since the 958 starts out in 1st gear (unlike a 955/957) and it's a low first gear - a low range probably would be unnecessary. When the 955/057 was first engineered (think back in 1999/2000 probably) - a 6 speed transmission was as good as it got. Since the 958 got an 8 speed - that allowed Porsche to use a lower 1st gear and eliminate the need for a low range transfer case, which on probably 99.9% of the 955/957 Cayennes sold - was never used.
That is good to know, but you forgot about the diff gears. Despite the extra transmission gears, the 958 CTT appears to me to actually be taller in 1st gear than the 955 CTT. With the low transfer case gear the crawl ratios between the two still aren't even close... please let me know if my Math or numbers are wrong:

955 CTT
1st gear: 4.15
Final drive ratio: 3.7
Transfer case High: 1
Transfer case Low: 2.7

1st Gear Crawl Ratio High: 15.36:1
1st Gear Crawl Ratio Low: 41.46:1

958 CTT
1st gear: 4.97
Final drive ratio: 2.92

1st Gear Crawl Ratio: 14.51:1

Don't forget that the 955 transfer case allows the use of the other transmission gears as well.
Old 02-23-2018, 10:06 PM
  #38  
garrett376
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
garrett376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,275
Received 563 Likes on 430 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nodoors
So basically you are saying the low range transfer case is an entirely unnecessary feature and all engineers, manufacturers, and offroaders to date have just been confused about that?
No, I am basically saying: The 958 is fantastic off-road - I actually prefer it to my prior 957. The 958 will go anywhere a similarly equipped 955/957 will go, and there are more 958's with locking rear differentials than there are 957/955's, so it's possible a 958 may be able to go further than 955/957's...
Old 02-23-2018, 10:29 PM
  #39  
deilenberger
Banned
 
deilenberger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Spring Lake, NJ, US of A
Posts: 10,085
Received 1,141 Likes on 758 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nodoors
That is good to know, but you forgot about the diff gears. Despite the extra transmission gears, the 958 CTT appears to me to actually be taller in 1st gear than the 955 CTT. With the low transfer case gear the crawl ratios between the two still aren't even close... please let me know if my Math or numbers are wrong:

955 CTT
1st gear: 4.15
Final drive ratio: 3.7
Transfer case High: 1
Transfer case Low: 2.7

1st Gear Crawl Ratio High: 15.36:1
1st Gear Crawl Ratio Low: 41.46:1

958 CTT
1st gear: 4.97
Final drive ratio: 2.92

1st Gear Crawl Ratio: 14.51:1

Don't forget that the 955 transfer case allows the use of the other transmission gears as well.
Do the same calculation for the 995 starting off in 2nd gear.. which is where most people would be if they weren't shifting it manually.
Old 02-23-2018, 10:42 PM
  #40  
nodoors
Three Wheelin'
 
nodoors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,682
Received 65 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

By offroading standards, 50:1 is decent, but many people shoot for twice that. I have an offroad rig with 62:1 and I still want more gear.
Old 02-23-2018, 11:00 PM
  #41  
nodoors
Three Wheelin'
 
nodoors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,682
Received 65 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deilenberger
Do the same calculation for the 995 starting off in 2nd gear.. which is where most people would be if they weren't shifting it manually.
955 CTT 1st Gear Low Range Crawl Ratio:: 41.46:1
955 CTT 2nd Gear Low Range Crawl Ratio: 23.68:1
955 CTT 3rd Gear Low Range Crawl Ratio: 15.58
955 CTT 1st Gear High Range Crawl Ratio: 15.36:1

955 CTT 2nd Gear High Range Crawl Ratio: 8.77:1
958 CTT 2nd Gear: 8:21:1

What's your point? If one is offroading in a 955 and is using low range, they are going to manually select the gear they wish to use. They have 4 total choices (1,2,3 low and 1st high) that are lower range than 1st gear on a 958, which is 14.51:1. I could be wrong about these calcs, but I pulled them from Porsche's data sheets:
http://press.porsche.com/archive/pro...enne_specs.pdf
http://press.porsche.com/vehicles/20...pecs_w_GTS.pdf
Old 02-26-2018, 12:57 PM
  #42  
nodoors
Three Wheelin'
 
nodoors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,682
Received 65 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garrett376
No, I am basically saying: The 958 is fantastic off-road - I actually prefer it to my prior 957. The 958 will go anywhere a similarly equipped 955/957 will go, and there are more 958's with locking rear differentials than there are 957/955's, so it's possible a 958 may be able to go further than 955/957's...
Sorry I worded my other response in such a snarky way. I am glad the 958 works for your uses, but you are going to be hard pressed to convince many people who intend to drive offroad especially when loaded down or towing that the numbers I detailed above don't mean anything. The points of this thread was for people considering upgrading and I am just trying to help make sure we have the facts straight, but your experience is also valid.

As far as Don's point about 99.9% of the 955/7 sold have never used low range - GREAT. That means enthusiasts who break things will have plenty of fresh transfer drivetrain parts in the future! Some of the older drivetrain components loved by offroaders are getting harder to come by these days. This is sometimes frustrating for me on other vehicles because it makes me want to limit the fun that I have with them which defeats the whole point!



Quick Reply: For those of you considering "upgrading" to a 2011+



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:34 PM.