Notices
Boxster & Boxster S (986) Forum 1996-2004
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Moving from 944 to Boxster: Do I want an "S"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2003, 12:33 PM
  #1  
michael_portnoy
5th Gear
Thread Starter
 
michael_portnoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile Moving from 944 to Boxster: Do I want an "S"?

I'm a long-time (13 years) owner of a red 1985.5 944 and I'm thinking about getting something newer, something with POWER LOCKS (as my wife always points out), maybe a Boxster.

When I bought my 944, there was a lot of debate about turbo vs. NA vs. 968. I survived the experience and have been happy with my 944.

I have no data on Boxsters, though. What is the main difference between an "S" and "non-S" model? Did Boxsters have a major design change similar to the pre-1985.5/post-1985.5 changes in the 944 line?

A pointer to an FAQ or equivalent will be appreciated. (Especially since I'm heading out today to test drive one of these critters.)

Thanks!
Old 03-28-2003, 02:45 PM
  #2  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,562
Received 5,885 Likes on 2,408 Posts
Post

major redesign in box came in 2000 when engine bumped from 190+ to 217, also S came out at 250hp. stylistically, 2003 got a face lift with different front/rear end and glass rear window with small hp increase but louder exhasut and stiffer susp. i had an S b/c to me i can tell the pwr difference is signifcant, espeically if you track the car. some would disagree. it's a big diff. in price $9k, so test both and if you can't tell the diff. stay with the non S and save some money.
Old 03-28-2003, 03:22 PM
  #3  
Dwayne Williams
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dwayne Williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I've got an 1986 944 turbo and I'm in the middle of buying a Boxster S. If you can swing it, I'd really recommend the S. I've driven both and the extra power makes a big difference. I'm used to driving a slightly modified 944 turbo, so while the regular Boxster is still a blast to drive it just didn't have enough get up and go for my taste - hence the S. S is going to be more expensive so you need to drive both and then decide.
Old 03-28-2003, 04:25 PM
  #4  
Sean
Drifting
 
Sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,050
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

I hate to give the stock answer, but here is the stock answer: if you can afford it, get the S.

The S has goodies in addition to power. I honestly can't remember all of these options, but in 2000 they included the upgraded suspension, brakes from the 996, and the 6-speed 996 tranny. There was other stuff too (lined convertible top, and dual tip exhaust).

If you total up all the extra goodies, it's probably cheaper to get the S rather than upgrade a 2.5 or 2.7. Plus, there's the main draw of the extra power.
Old 03-28-2003, 04:41 PM
  #5  
craigg
Instructor
 
craigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sssssssss!
Old 03-29-2003, 12:56 PM
  #6  
Ghost Rider
Banned
 
Ghost Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Satisfaction begins with "S"
Old 04-01-2003, 11:09 AM
  #7  
Wachuko
Professor of Pending Projects
Rennlist Member
 
Wachuko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,891
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Post

Get an S. More hp, 6 Speed, better brakes, improved suspension, etc...
Old 04-01-2003, 07:34 PM
  #8  
VMac
5th Gear
 
VMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bethlehem, PA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Simple Answer: how many people have you heard of either a) moving from and S to a base, or b)regretting the S purchase over the base.
Old 04-02-2003, 01:52 AM
  #9  
Enzo's Nightmare
Burning Brakes
 
Enzo's Nightmare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by VMac:
<strong>Simple Answer: how many people have you heard of either a) moving from and S to a base, or b)regretting the S purchase over the base.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Sounds more like a question. Welcome to the Rennlist.
Old 04-02-2003, 11:48 AM
  #10  
RJT
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
RJT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 13,209
Received 357 Likes on 158 Posts
Post

My only comment here, because I've owned both cars, a 85.5 944 and a 01 Boxster, would a comfort issue. I say this ONLY because I am 6'4" and had much more leg and arm room in the 944. The 944 seats had alot more fore and aft movement than the Boxster. I was still cramped when the Boxster's seat's were all the way back. I didn't really notice the discomfort until we went on a trip and after a couple of hours I felt pretty confined! We sold the 986 and bought a 993 C2S. Of course if you're not as tall as I am.......you can disregard all of this!!
Cheers to All...
Robert
97 C2S
65 356 euro C
previous:
01 986
74 911
85.5 944
70 914 6
66 911
Old 04-02-2003, 06:25 PM
  #11  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Post

I have driven all three cars. Both the 986 and the 986S will provide a significant performance leap from a NA 944. The S does have an extra cog, upgraded brakes, and 33 more hp than the "regular" 986 (you feel it mostly in the "midrange"). The real question is.......is that enough to justify an extra 10K?

For some yes.....others no, but both will corner like a dream and are very satisfying to drive.
Old 04-04-2003, 04:08 AM
  #12  
sweanders
Race Director
 
sweanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Ray:

Maybe you should rezise that avatar of yours? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
Lovely car btw, yours?
Old 04-04-2003, 12:20 PM
  #13  
Dwayne Williams
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dwayne Williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Finally got all the paperwork in order and have had my S for a couple of days now. Love this car - definitely recommend the S.
Old 04-04-2003, 01:00 PM
  #14  
boxsterboxsterS
4th Gear
 
boxsterboxsterS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

i am also 6'4" like RJT 993 but i have to say in the driver seat of a 86 944 and a 03 S have the same amount of room. its the passenger seats that are different
Old 04-04-2003, 04:33 PM
  #15  
MM951
Race Director
 
MM951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hudson Valley
Posts: 10,607
Received 49 Likes on 39 Posts
Post

Dwanye, how does your Modded 951 compare to the s?


Quick Reply: Moving from 944 to Boxster: Do I want an "S"?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:15 PM.