BMC Air Filter-Worth the Cost?
#1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
BMC Air Filter-Worth the Cost?
My OEM paper air filter must be replaced. I've found the OEM replacement on-line for $55.00 plus free shipping. However, for $210.00 and free shipping I can also buy a BMC filter. Is the extra $$$ worth it?
I've used K&N oiled filters on my AMG's without any problems and note the BMC is very similar. IMO, I did not notice and performance difference-
I've used K&N oiled filters on my AMG's without any problems and note the BMC is very similar. IMO, I did not notice and performance difference-
#2
My OEM paper air filter must be replaced. I've found the OEM replacement on-line for $55.00 plus free shipping. However, for $210.00 and free shipping I can also buy a BMC filter. Is the extra $$$ worth it?
I've used K&N oiled filters on my AMG's without any problems and note the BMC is very similar. IMO, I did not notice and performance difference-
I've used K&N oiled filters on my AMG's without any problems and note the BMC is very similar. IMO, I did not notice and performance difference-
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/g...ter-4-gt3.html
No gains, no enhancements of any nature...
Why blow money on a psychological delusion.
#3
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Thanks, I agree. IMO K&N and BMC filters will not/do not add any measurable difference in an already OEM tuned engine. Although I've never had any problem with a K&N installed in my AMG's (2 SL55's, 2 CLK63's including a Black Series and etc.) I did get a CEL when I installed it in my 07 E550. For the price of one BMC filter I can get four OEM paper filters. That's a low risk, cost effective no brainer decision for me.
Trending Topics
#9
Rennlist Member
#10
I've always questioned its efficiency in purifying the air vs the stock paper unit. Stands to reason it isn't going to do the fundamental job as well. And thats what it's there for. So if there is no power gain etc why bother.
#13
Rennlist Member
#14
Well that myth certainly appears to have been completely debunked now with sharky saying it neither improves sound nor makes one iota difference in HP, using his heavily modded 3.9 as a reference point.
So when you say modified cars, i'm assuming you are referring to the engine side of things? (JK.) Mind you a stock GT3 engine is already a highly tuned piece of kit vs the average conventional less techy engines you find in most cars these days, so that in itself (a stock GT3 engine) is surely an adequate bench mark? And if not, why not?
As i pointed out earlier, the air cleaner is primarily there to clean fine particulate out of the air for the purpose of reducing internal cylinder/engine wear. Removing the filter or, reducing its efficiency is a given that the engine will not be as durable wear wise. So when one embarks on these excercises one needs to seriously ask ones self what is the goal in the exercise because if the only tangible result is a decrease in cylinder and engine life then at any money its a very bad deal .
There may be some psycological benefit in believing the marketing and advertising hype surrounding the item, that it is actually doing something of tangible benefit performance and soundwise however, again isn't that just being delusional given sharky's "proof in the pudding" exercise that in reality it does absolutely SFA? Sorry, it does do something; Reduces cylinder and engine component life.
I personally couldn't see any logic increasing engine wear no matter what the degree is found to be, least of all paying a huge premium in the process, especially when there really are no tangible gains whatsoever. And lets say even if there was a tiny gain somewhere, it would be so minor it wouldn't offset the downside anyway.
And let's imagine if there was some slight (psycological) gain, it again would be so minor it also wouldn't be worth the offset in increased engine wear and the inconvenience screwing around washing the damn thing out and re oiling it.
My own expereince with these types of filters is you can never rid 100% of the debris anyway, and chances are in the process of washing it out you further diminish the filtration capacity along with dislodging fine particles and moving them on the wrong side of the filter. It'd be akin to washing out an oil filter. I mean why on earth would you bother?
There is simply no substitute for replacing an air or oil or fuel filter with a brand new one. But again, to each his own poison.
So when you say modified cars, i'm assuming you are referring to the engine side of things? (JK.) Mind you a stock GT3 engine is already a highly tuned piece of kit vs the average conventional less techy engines you find in most cars these days, so that in itself (a stock GT3 engine) is surely an adequate bench mark? And if not, why not?
As i pointed out earlier, the air cleaner is primarily there to clean fine particulate out of the air for the purpose of reducing internal cylinder/engine wear. Removing the filter or, reducing its efficiency is a given that the engine will not be as durable wear wise. So when one embarks on these excercises one needs to seriously ask ones self what is the goal in the exercise because if the only tangible result is a decrease in cylinder and engine life then at any money its a very bad deal .
There may be some psycological benefit in believing the marketing and advertising hype surrounding the item, that it is actually doing something of tangible benefit performance and soundwise however, again isn't that just being delusional given sharky's "proof in the pudding" exercise that in reality it does absolutely SFA? Sorry, it does do something; Reduces cylinder and engine component life.
I personally couldn't see any logic increasing engine wear no matter what the degree is found to be, least of all paying a huge premium in the process, especially when there really are no tangible gains whatsoever. And lets say even if there was a tiny gain somewhere, it would be so minor it wouldn't offset the downside anyway.
And let's imagine if there was some slight (psycological) gain, it again would be so minor it also wouldn't be worth the offset in increased engine wear and the inconvenience screwing around washing the damn thing out and re oiling it.
My own expereince with these types of filters is you can never rid 100% of the debris anyway, and chances are in the process of washing it out you further diminish the filtration capacity along with dislodging fine particles and moving them on the wrong side of the filter. It'd be akin to washing out an oil filter. I mean why on earth would you bother?
There is simply no substitute for replacing an air or oil or fuel filter with a brand new one. But again, to each his own poison.
#15
It's a bit like a dealer selling fabric protection on a new car purchase....money for jam. So why would a Mod shop not push the add ons when there is good profit in it? Nothing wrong with that. If the punters keep paying and believing, that's even better still .