Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

991 GT3 is not a 911

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2014, 02:19 AM
  #46  
ngng
Drifting
 
ngng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,057
Received 305 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K964
No. They are too concerned with what driving gloves to buy, who has the coolest "Martini" graphics, and "Desperately Tracking Ship X" to debate the nonsense posted by the OP. Carry on. Nothing to see here....
Old 11-07-2014, 04:35 AM
  #47  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,395
Received 5,630 Likes on 2,314 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
So I guess slowly slowly people are accepting the way of the future where " any idiot " can drive a fast car. So my question is : why the Hell has the GT-R been so criticized?! It does exactly that!
I did not drive the 991GT3,but I have a feeling there's a bit of exaggeration in the OP's post...the 991GT3 is no GT-R and it probably still provides some involvement.
Either way,I have no interest in any sports car that " any idiot " can drive fast. I need to feel that I'm working to make it go fast. There will be other cars-much cheaper that I can just use to go from A to B.
drive a GTR then driver a 991gt. you will agree. i cannot put it into elegant prose. but my butt is a good detector of what i like. your butt may vary

Originally Posted by Riz
I drove my friends car today finally. I was able to put in about 25 miles on it. I drove it a mix of about 10 miles highway and off ramps and the rest on a nice loop of slow and fast corners. The roads were fairly smooth with some bumpy sections. Car had a little over 3k miles on it. I am on the list to get the RS version so I wanted to have a go in a regular one. A few impressions:

1. It looks amazing in person. I have never seen one in the flesh. Beautifully aggressive is how I would describe it.
2. It sound really good especially past 6k rpm but not as mechanical as the Mezger. A little one dimensional.
3. Steering feel ok but not great. Not really an issue for me.
4. PDK-S the best dual clutch I have driven.
5. RWS I actually noticed it a few times in very tight 2nd gear corners really pushing it
6. PTV much better than in the 997.2 turbo S, hardly noticeable but something was happening in really fast tight 2nd gear corners. Maybe it was the RWS and the PTV working together.
7. It is faster than anything on real roads. I was driving at ridiculous speeds through the corners while drinking an iced coffee.
8. Any idiot can go fast in this car.
9. Am I an idiot?
10. I am a big idiot therefore I need the RS

The 997 is really the last 911. This is entirely something else.
GREAT, just GREAT. now does this mean you wont ever sell me your low option Rs3.8?????

Originally Posted by 997rs4.0
This is very interesting, I completely agree with above statement! You need to be a good driver to get the most out of any car. The problem with a lot of modern street legal track cars is that they make people feel like any idiot can drive fast. And when things go wrong, it ends really bad because of the speed you carry. So in a way any idiot can drive faster than they should!
yes, some ppl are getting too fast in fast cars for their own good but look on the bright side. darwin will help us. some will parish and breed the smarter next gen... well, i hope darwin is right.... but then there comes me.... so darwin may be wrong..

Originally Posted by Nizer
Isn't this thread in the wrong forum....?
now you are being mean



Originally Posted by Nizer
Rule #1 in my book is make it lightweight. Beyond that almost everything else is up for debate.
yes, you saw my new stripper pic? it's 2680 lbs at 3/8 tank no driver. now if i can borrow your cup engine....

Originally Posted by aussie jimmy
saw my first 991gt3 a few weeks ago.
didn't like it at all.
looks really big and unnecessarily overweight with gratuitous details.
did nothing for me.
the new targa looks 1000 times more elegant as does a 997 gt3.

991gt3 looks like a boy's toy for the cash-up tech noob.
no elegance whatsoever. might be fast, but so are all the previous gt3's.
at least they have style too.
no no no. you are mixing it all up.
7.2 is gryphon. you listen to it, touch it, feel it and worship it then whisper to it.
991 is technics 1200, sophisticated, does everything right and a work horse. it just does it. you dont have to make love to it.. it just does it.

you dont bring your airtangent on oracle delphi to a frat party do u? try to mix songs with that set up....

Originally Posted by MaxLTV
Come on, be fair, that's typical to any new model forum, when people do not have the car, they obsess about such things in anticipation. More "manly" questions about alignment, tire pressures, falling off centerlocks and blown coolant hoses will come later when most people actually get to drive their cars. All that fluff only matters in the beginning. After 9 months with the car, I'm starting to forget what color it is:


i can attest that max is making the 991 brigade proud. he's driving the snots out of the red thing. good work, max! did we show you the 19" wheels we have hidden for our inbound 991?.... next time you stop by, make sure chasen show you and prepare to drool
Old 11-07-2014, 08:05 AM
  #48  
K964
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
K964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Other PA
Posts: 3,027
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Riz
You are so right. I did not post on 991GT3 forum for those reasons. I did not want to distract them from tracking ships, deciding on the different shades of PTS blue to order(is it mexico blue, riviera blue, gulf blue, cobalt blue, bleu cheese blue?), euro delivery vs picking up here, selling my 14 to pick up a 15 because I don't like the seat belt color I chose. Its better to debate the nonsense I posted on this forum.
Haha. Forgot about the selling of the 14 to snag a 15 because of the seatbelt color. Too funny. Seems like something you would hear from some hairdressers on the chickster forum. And "bleu cheese blue"? That's a classic right there. Love it!!!
Old 11-07-2014, 09:27 AM
  #49  
aussie jimmy
Rennlist Member
 
aussie jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

991 targa and 50th look beautiful (to me)
flowing lines and elegant.
gt3 has this body kit which doesn't flow (imo)
look at the rear valance, wing etc, it's all wrong. 7.1 was the ****. such elegance.
maybe i'm getting old....
mooty - the gryphon is like 991, jadis is like 997; jewel-like, and sweet.

peter, the cayman does look promising, even a black/black/black gts looks nice.
plenty fast enough for me. not tracking anymore, so fast enough to stay adrift of the traffic here.

i like the old cayman though. details everywhere you look. just like z4m coupe ( even though i hate bmw's)
Old 11-07-2014, 11:07 AM
  #50  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,605
Received 1,839 Likes on 954 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mooty
yes, you saw my new stripper pic? it's 2680 lbs at 3/8 tank no driver. now if i can borrow your cup engine....
Can't have mine but you can have this one: https://rennlist.com/forums/racing-a...tor-14-5k.html

Same motor that's in the Cup, ex-variocam.
Old 11-07-2014, 11:20 AM
  #51  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,383
Received 1,629 Likes on 756 Posts
Default

So my full interior in race spec = street spec is only 100lbs heavier than stripper?
In need to start looking into 3.8L aircooled flat six..
Old 11-07-2014, 11:30 AM
  #52  
BBMGT3
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
BBMGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,233
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have a theory on the 991 GT3 vs the 997

The 991 is amazing. Fast and easier than the 997. The 997 in particular had such a high mastery curve that the laptime difference between experts and intermediates or newbies was massive (several seconds a lap. Getting within 3s of an expert in a 997 is considered an achievement). Why did it have this curve? The car worked in a very narrow window; and finding the sweet spot where the car turned properly with sufficient speed was very difficult, and then understanding how to be WOT at the apex (or nearabouts) took time. Finally, there was downshifting, which, takes bandwidth, agility and practice.

The 991 eliminates a LOT of these requirements. Turn in is much, much, much easier. Downshifting is automatic. Braking is different. Wheelbase, everything. So the starting point for a newish driver compared to a pro time will be much closer. What used to be a 3s/lap gap is now halved.

The point is reinforced in the race cars, too. Take one look at the Carrera Cup Germany or Supercup qualifying timesheets from the 997 to the 991 and you will understand.

The best drivers will still be the best. But the car has just made them seem closer. And I love it, I absolutely want a 991 which I will use to set the odd superlap and as a DD most of the time.
Old 11-07-2014, 11:44 AM
  #53  
Tacet-Conundrum
Drifting
 
Tacet-Conundrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Belmont Shore in Long Beach CA
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Riz
[B]
7. It is faster than anything on real roads. I was driving at ridiculous speeds through the corners while drinking an iced coffee.
8. Any idiot can go fast in this car.
9. Am I an idiot.
It's kind of the point of having a Porsche with Chicktronic, aka PDK/S.
You can get the fastest 0 to 60 times while drinking your favorite drink. Like a Coke, Latte, Prune Juice et al!
Old 11-07-2014, 12:03 PM
  #54  
85Gold
Rennlist Member
 
85Gold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 92 miles from Sebring
Posts: 5,036
Received 798 Likes on 454 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 996FLT6
I assume the Audi tt rs is fwd only rt? Last year a highly modified tt-rs won the 25 hrs of thill won it overall which for most part have been dominated by Porsche cupcars for years. At least reading from articles- aero and suspension geometry was the key. Mike
AWD but definently front biased. Gonna keep it street friendly just add camber and a little stiffer springs. Even going to NOT tune it for that extra 100hp as I want to keep the warranty.

Peter
Old 11-07-2014, 03:55 PM
  #55  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,653
Received 953 Likes on 551 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BBMGT3
I have a theory on the 991 GT3 vs the 997

The 991 is amazing. Fast and easier than the 997. The 997 in particular had such a high mastery curve that the laptime difference between experts and intermediates or newbies was massive (several seconds a lap. Getting within 3s of an expert in a 997 is considered an achievement). Why did it have this curve? The car worked in a very narrow window; and finding the sweet spot where the car turned properly with sufficient speed was very difficult, and then understanding how to be WOT at the apex (or nearabouts) took time. Finally, there was downshifting, which, takes bandwidth, agility and practice.

The 991 eliminates a LOT of these requirements. Turn in is much, much, much easier. Downshifting is automatic. Braking is different. Wheelbase, everything. So the starting point for a newish driver compared to a pro time will be much closer. What used to be a 3s/lap gap is now halved.

The point is reinforced in the race cars, too. Take one look at the Carrera Cup Germany or Supercup qualifying timesheets from the 997 to the 991 and you will understand.

The best drivers will still be the best. But the car has just made them seem closer. And I love it, I absolutely want a 991 which I will use to set the odd superlap and as a DD most of the time.
+100

(And try going from something like a 991 to a 997 - you learn very quickly that you suck. I went from an e90M3 with DSG...to this beast)
Old 11-07-2014, 05:01 PM
  #56  
fbirch
Burning Brakes
 
fbirch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShakeNBake
I am not sure what your question really is. I have had the pleasure/misfortune of instructing many students in GTRs, and a couple instructor candidates for that matter - not that this means anything about their driving skills....

Fact is that you can carry way more speed in a GTR without actually being able to understand driving dynamics and cadence. Modern engineering will solve all of the at the limit issues that usually results in offroad excursions. Most students in GTRs run out of room in Green or Blue (Our novice groups in Texas) long before they actually have what I would consider to be intermediate driving skills. WORSE YET, some students are promoted to higher run groups because the instructor judges their skill based on speed. I think this is what people refer to....it's being able to carry a lot of speed, without being responsible for it.

I presume everyone here will this when I say the 911 is not an easy car to drive at the limit. Having learned to drive fast/race in BMWs, going to the GT3 was a shocker. Granted the 997 was easier than the 996, which was easier than the 993....etc. I don't really think it's that important for the discussion, other than to say the 991 is another step function in engineering that allows one to carry far more speed than one is truly responsible for.
I think your post hits the nail on the head. A common trait of almost every newbie student who drives a modern car with advanced stability control is this: They can set much faster lap times than would be remotely possible without electronic intervention, and do so in spite of the bad technique we all had when first starting out. Of course they’d be faster still with better driving skills, but the point is that they’re able to drive at a much faster pace (a bigger % of the car’s potential) than would be possible without the intervention of the nanny systems. I have no idea if that trait is true of the 991 GT3, as I’ve never driven one or even rode shotgun in one. But it seems that may have been what the OP was getting at with the “any idiot” comment.

And as everybody knows, the downside of nanny systems for a newbie driver is that (a) Bad habits can take longer to break, and (b) Past a certain point, physics overwhelms even the best nanny system, and nanny systems guarantee that point will happen at a much higher speed than would otherwise have been the case, where a newbie is much more likely to be in over his head. So modern nannies can definitely be a double edged sword for a newbie track participant.
Old 11-07-2014, 05:37 PM
  #57  
sfo
Burning Brakes
 
sfo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,087
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fbirch
And as everybody knows, the downside of nanny systems for a newbie driver is that (a) Bad habits can take longer to break, and (b) Past a certain point, physics overwhelms even the best nanny system, and nanny systems guarantee that point will happen at a much higher speed than would otherwise have been the case, where a newbie is much more likely to be in over his head. So modern nannies can definitely be a double edged sword for a newbie track participant.
so true.

and ultimately if nanny systems are over relied on, car is much more dangerous
Old 11-07-2014, 06:57 PM
  #58  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,605
Received 1,839 Likes on 954 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fbirch
I think your post hits the nail on the head. A common trait of almost every newbie student who drives a modern car with advanced stability control is this: They can set much faster lap times than would be remotely possible without electronic intervention, and do so in spite of the bad technique we all had when first starting out. Of course they’d be faster still with better driving skills, but the point is that they’re able to drive at a much faster pace (a bigger % of the car’s potential) than would be possible without the intervention of the nanny systems. I have no idea if that trait is true of the 991 GT3, as I’ve never driven one or even rode shotgun in one. But it seems that may have been what the OP was getting at with the “any idiot” comment.

And as everybody knows, the downside of nanny systems for a newbie driver is that (a) Bad habits can take longer to break, and (b) Past a certain point, physics overwhelms even the best nanny system, and nanny systems guarantee that point will happen at a much higher speed than would otherwise have been the case, where a newbie is much more likely to be in over his head. So modern nannies can definitely be a double edged sword for a newbie track participant.
Agreed. But in reference to this thread, I'd suggest we passed the tipping point 3-4 generations of 911's/GT3's back, i.e, around the 993 to 996 transition.
Old 11-07-2014, 07:47 PM
  #59  
Riz
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Riz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

mispost

Last edited by Riz; 11-07-2014 at 09:24 PM. Reason: mispost
Old 11-07-2014, 08:04 PM
  #60  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Riz
2014 Evo Car of the year - Ferrari 458 Speciale. I thought the GT3 pretty much owned this category in the past. Not so for the 991 GT3? I don't even see it in the top 10. I haven't seen the full article but from what little I read, I did not see it.
That's because it won LAST year (991 GT3)



Quick Reply: 991 GT3 is not a 911



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:08 AM.