Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

7.2 Factory Limited Slip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2013, 06:00 PM
  #16  
fbirch
Burning Brakes
 
fbirch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911SLOW
You put a CL's hub on one side and a vice on the other.
If the CL breaks first LSD is good.
LOL!!! Good one!
Old 02-13-2013, 06:02 PM
  #17  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,383
Received 1,629 Likes on 756 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoosier_Daddy
That would be cheating.
If you call parking lot cone bashing racing, than they all got 'em..
Old 02-13-2013, 06:08 PM
  #18  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 0
Received 230 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoosier_Daddy
Quickly learning who's cars should get protested if ever competing against...

Guys... in this instance changing ANYTHING mechanical from factory is illegal.

Not a hard concept.
Sounds like, in this case, you have no desire to do what many of your AX competitors are already doing, which is admirable, but foolish IMO.

Therefore:

You have some options, none of which I think are illegal, all of which Matt at Guard can do for you.

Keep the stock ramps, but rebuild the entire internals with a new factory clutchpack, however have Matt shim it correctly and put enough pre-load on it so it actually works. Nothing has changed, zero, nada. Just a rebuilt LSD, which IS a wear item, just like brakes, tires, bushings etc. You have replaced it with same exact items, works "mechanically" the exact same.

Or

Keep the stock ramps, but use a Guard clutch pack instead, and rebuild the diff.
Again, you have kept everything mechanically the same, no change in ramps, you have simply replaced a "wear item", which a clutch pack is, with a replacement set. It's not OEM, but mechanically, it works the same. I don't see any issue with this either.
Old 02-13-2013, 06:10 PM
  #19  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Yeah, similar to changing the brake pads to a different brand... !
Old 02-13-2013, 06:31 PM
  #20  
tasman
Race Car
 
tasman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 3,634
Received 125 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoosier_Daddy
Quickly learning who's cars should get protested if ever competing against...

Guys... in this instance changing ANYTHING mechanical from factory is illegal.

Not a hard concept.
It is around here.
Old 02-13-2013, 07:06 PM
  #21  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevecolletti
Do they take points off for having a failed LSD?
Originally Posted by Hoosier_Daddy
Would they take points off for heat cycled out tires or being out of alignment?
Since tech has rejected my occasional protests that the driver has failed or is out of alignment, I doubt it.....
Old 02-13-2013, 07:08 PM
  #22  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
If you call parking lot cone bashing racing, than they all got 'em..
Sounds like you've previously had a bad cone bashing experience......
Old 02-13-2013, 07:14 PM
  #23  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoosier_Daddy
That would be cheating.
not if you keep the same specs. The difference is that with guard internals it will late. If you change it to 80/20 or another number other than stock that is another story
Old 02-13-2013, 07:25 PM
  #24  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,383
Received 1,629 Likes on 756 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
Sounds like you've previously had a bad cone bashing experience......
I did, we stood around all day in the baking sun to drive 40 seconds around cones in a parking lot in 2nd gear with people thinking they could drive
Old 02-13-2013, 07:36 PM
  #25  
KaiB
Nordschleife Master
 
KaiB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deep Downtown Carrier, OK
Posts: 5,297
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
I did, we stood around all day in the baking sun to drive 40 seconds around cones in a parking lot in 2nd gear with people thinking they could drive
BBBAAAAAWWWWWAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!

ZoomZoom
Old 02-13-2013, 07:55 PM
  #26  
Nick Wong
Three Wheelin'
 
Nick Wong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoosier_Daddy
Quickly learning who's cars should get protested if ever competing against...

Guys... in this instance changing ANYTHING mechanical from factory is illegal.

Not a hard concept.
The issue is, what constitutes a change? Wear items by definition change- they wear. What if you don't use factory fill oil and trans fluid? Lots of power to be gained for autoX in lighter trans fluid for sure, just more maintenance intervals and quicker wear.

The reason why I ask about Motorsport parts legality is, technically speaking the parts are available from dealerships as replacement parts. Therefor, if you use a Motorsport diff parts and internals you can gain an advantage, and since it is, by definition from the factory, a wear item, I don't see how they can enforce any kind of non-OE rules violation. But stranger things happen all the time, and interpretation of rules is one of those things...

What rules set are you running? SCCA? I hate their rules definition and weenie protests- what is not explicitly stated in the rule book is illegal, and weenie protests seem to rule the day in autoX.
Old 02-13-2013, 08:03 PM
  #27  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
Sounds like you've previously had a bad cone bashing experience......
Yes, somebody with a Fiat put a smack down on all of them at a collective autoX, and they all quit.
Old 02-13-2013, 08:21 PM
  #28  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

On SCCA ruleset:

"Section 13. Alternate components which are normally expendable and considered
replacement parts (e.g., engine and wheel bearings, seals, gaskets,
filters, belts, bolts, bulbs, batteries, brake rotors, clutch discs, pressure
plates, suspension bushings, drivetrain mounts, fenders, trim pieces,
etc.) may be used provided they are essentially identical to the standard
parts (e.g. have the same type, size, hardness, weight, material etc.),
are used in the same location, and provide no performance benefit. The
allowance for use of such replacements does not include camshafts,
differential covers, or ring-and-pinion sets, nor does it authorize the use
of piston rings having different configurations (e.g. “Total Seal”) from
those of the original."

A limited slip is a wear item, and an aftermarket part is allowed, but there are restrictions. The only way to make the aftermarket LSD legal in a SCCA stock class is by using the same housing as stock, the same number of plates as stock, and the lock/unlock rates of the LSD match the ones in the OEM LSD. The aftermarket part must have no performance benefit.

To prove this, the car owner would need a brand new in-box LSD as equipped in the car, so this can be compared to the one in the car. Get protested (very likely at a Regional or National SCCA autoX event), get suspension disassembled, axle disconnected, LSD removed, and let the SCCA techs or a Porsche dealer compare the two units, and come up with a result that both parts have identical behavior.

By the way, the wording on the above rule is vague and misleading. No aftermarket part will match the same material/weight/size/hardness, not even a bulb. There are tolerances, and even the OEM parts can have different size/material/hardness depending on who supplied Porsche that day of the week.
Old 02-13-2013, 08:23 PM
  #29  
NorthVan
Three Wheelin'
 
NorthVan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PJS996GT3
Q: Are they factory parts?
A: yes they were made in a factory

Q: oem diff?
A: hell yes the housing is oem

:-)
When discussing undisclosed mods, I will make sure I listen carefully to everything you say
Old 02-13-2013, 08:48 PM
  #30  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 0
Received 230 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
On SCCA ruleset:

"Section 13. Alternate components which are normally expendable and considered
replacement parts (e.g., engine and wheel bearings, seals, gaskets,
filters, belts, bolts, bulbs, batteries, brake rotors, clutch discs, pressure
plates, suspension bushings, drivetrain mounts, fenders, trim pieces,
etc.) may be used provided they are essentially identical to the standard
parts (e.g. have the same type, size, hardness, weight, material etc.),
are used in the same location, and provide no performance benefit. The
allowance for use of such replacements does not include camshafts,
differential covers, or ring-and-pinion sets, nor does it authorize the use
of piston rings having different configurations (e.g. “Total Seal”) from
those of the original."

A limited slip is a wear item, and an aftermarket part is allowed, but there are restrictions. The only way to make the aftermarket LSD legal in a SCCA stock class is by using the same housing as stock, the same number of plates as stock, and the lock/unlock rates of the LSD match the ones in the OEM LSD. The aftermarket part must have no performance benefit.

To prove this, the car owner would need a brand new in-box LSD as equipped in the car, so this can be compared to the one in the car. Get protested (very likely at a Regional or National SCCA autoX event), get suspension disassembled, axle disconnected, LSD removed, and let the SCCA techs or a Porsche dealer compare the two units, and come up with a result that both parts have identical behavior.

By the way, the wording on the above rule is vague and misleading. No aftermarket part will match the same material/weight/size/hardness, not even a bulb. There are tolerances, and even the OEM parts can have different size/material/hardness depending on who supplied Porsche that day of the week.
Exactly. So in other words, both scenarios I described earlier should be legal, because neither give an "advantage" technically, because an LSD using the same parts or different friction plates for that matter (but same number of plates), can be tuned to the driving "style" of the owner, and varies, just how shocks can be set to certain rebound and compression settings for driver style. That's setup, it just happens to be alot more expensive to "tune" your LSD.

The fact that the OEM unit for Porsche varies so greatly is the very reason they couldn't disqualify you, or set up some sort of "standard" other than specifiying that stock ramps, casing, and number of plates must be used. How much pre-load you put on your LSD is your choice, and not somethig to be disqualified for.


Quick Reply: 7.2 Factory Limited Slip



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:25 AM.