Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Race Shops: Weigh in on CL Reliability?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2012, 01:49 AM
  #1  
ChrisF
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ChrisF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: La La Land
Posts: 4,184
Received 977 Likes on 365 Posts
Default Race Shops: Weigh in on CL Reliability?

There are a bunch of great shops that maintain a presence on this board and on Rennlist in general (Sharkwerks, RSS, GMG, BRRacing, Orbit to name a few). Given the several highly visible catastrophic CL failures of late, there seems to be a wide range of opinions on whether the CL mechanism should be trusted. Some say they're fine and the failures are due to error; others say go 5 lug or don't track at all.

To the shops that support and maintain these vehicles, what is your take on the issue? All insight greatly appreciated.
Old 08-15-2012, 03:55 PM
  #2  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,772
Received 3,598 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

:crickets:
Old 08-15-2012, 04:21 PM
  #3  
mike1111
Rennlist Member
 
mike1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: orlando, fl.
Posts: 399
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Old 08-15-2012, 04:28 PM
  #4  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,772
Received 3,598 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

Old 08-15-2012, 04:33 PM
  #5  
ChrisF
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ChrisF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: La La Land
Posts: 4,184
Received 977 Likes on 365 Posts
Default

Yep. Wondering if it's out of liability concerns. Sad if it is.
Old 08-15-2012, 04:56 PM
  #6  
ttdan
Advanced
 
ttdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South of England
Posts: 86
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I would imagine so, shame, if you think about it though there's no liability involved if someone slagged the system off as total unsafe rubbish so there is that.
Old 08-15-2012, 07:18 PM
  #7  
BRracing
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
BRracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

OK, we'll weigh in (BRracing). And, then will post the standard disclaimer. This is not a judgement, determination, ruling, etc, but an opinion based on our and our customers experience, and we do not have actual data or analytics to either support or contradict our opinion or the viability or non-viability of the CL for track use.

There are a lot of views about the 997 CL and ability or suitability for track use. There are a lot of opinions about the possible causes to the known failures. We have had a customer who has had one of these failures (right rear). I was driving in one of our other 997.2 GT3's, right behind our customers car, when the failure occurred. I had been behind the car the whole session (failure was at Buttonwillow in May 2012). The car had not been over the curbs, had not had an off, had not encountered any abuse. We have also managed this car for most of the last year, and can again attest to the car being very well driven and not subjected to curb hopping or driving abuse. We also have many other 997.2 cars w CL, and are very well versed in the CL procedure (we have printed out the procedure, and made sure all our guys have read, reviewed, and adhere to the procedure).

We have talked w Porsche and many others on this. What has caused the biggest issue for us is that no one can provide any feedback or guidance on how to determine if there is an issue. How are we to know that a hub is in good shape, great shape, or starting to have an issue, or worse, has an issue? We have inspected all our cars, and have looked for all possible signs. We can not find any evidence or telltale signs. We can not see any difference between the failed hub and the other good hubs. We can not find or determine any abnormal stress, stretch, elongation, thread stretch, hub weakness, drive pin galling due to any issue, etc. We have asked for documentation or information on this, and have not been able to find any. The car that had the failure also had the recall processed on the CL.

Therefore, we have taken the position that since we don't know the health and status of a CL hub, can't determine the health of the CL, that the safe position is that the CL are not safe for track use. We will disclaim all responsibility for any CL car that will be taken to the track that we work on. As a result of that position and the discussion w some of our customers, we have converted some of the CL cars to a different solution. The viable solutions to us being either the Cup Car center lock or the 5 lug design. Both are good solutions in our view. We have tested at several track days since, and have had no issues. This is our view. And....if someone wants a kit for the Cup Car version, we now know the fitment, offset, and issues to make this kit work on either a narrow body or a wide body car. We can sell this kit. The CL option we like more, but it is more expensive (about 2x the cost of the 5 lug for the hub conversion itself....the wheels are the same cost, labor for either the 5 lug or the Cup CL option is about the same).

Now....what was interesting and ironic to us, was while in the midst of this investigation of the issue and solutions, Porsche all of a sudden made a change in the Cup Car CL design. We have, and had, other Porsche Cup Cars that we support. There is both the 997.1 version, and the 997.2 version. The change that occurred right at the end of June 2012, was a change to the 997.2 Cup Car hub. The new design is about 3 times as heavy, is much thicker....in every way a much more robust item. This is the version we have installed on 997.2 street cars w CL and now we even converted some of our 997.2 Cup Cars to this design. We are not provided info from Porsche as to why this design change was implemented. But, they recalled all the old versions. Odd timing to us, but nonetheless, seems to have significance in that the hub design needs to be very robust.

That's our view. Until someone has documentation to help us know when an issue is occurring, or what has given rise to the failure, we don't know, and therefore we can not accept or have the confidence in the CL for track use.

That's our view. Bring on the questions.
We are NOT material engineers. We are NOT design engineers (I may have an engr degree from UCLA, but that doesn't make me a design engineer for this application).

Bruce
BRracing
Old 08-15-2012, 07:53 PM
  #8  
ChrisF
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ChrisF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: La La Land
Posts: 4,184
Received 977 Likes on 365 Posts
Default

Thank you for posting Bruce. Greatly appreciated.
Old 08-15-2012, 08:24 PM
  #9  
kosmo
Race Director
 
kosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THE Republic
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

typical P attitude.

Thanks Bruce.
Old 08-15-2012, 11:03 PM
  #10  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,017
Received 4,942 Likes on 2,799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BRracing
The change that occurred right at the end of June 2012, was a change to the 997.2 Cup Car hub. The new design is about 3 times as heavy, is much thicker....in every way a much more robust item.
How does this increased weight compare to a 5-lug design?
Old 08-15-2012, 11:32 PM
  #11  
CRex
Rennlist Member
 
CRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 3,581
Received 382 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Bruce, thanks for the great feedback. From purely a standpoint of due caution, which was/were the failed part(s) in the May Buttonwillow incident?

p.s. Think I'll nominate post #7 as "post of the month". Finally, a nugget of solid facts on the subject!!
Old 08-16-2012, 12:59 AM
  #12  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Bruce, thanks a lot for stepping up.

I understand that Porsche shops touching these cl systems become liable if any failure occurs.
Old 08-16-2012, 01:35 AM
  #13  
DJN
Rennlist Member
 
DJN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 897
Received 63 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Post #7: Excellent write up Bruce!

Thank you for you insights.
Doug N
Old 08-16-2012, 01:54 AM
  #14  
ChrisF
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ChrisF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: La La Land
Posts: 4,184
Received 977 Likes on 365 Posts
Default

Ok, GMG, Sharkwerks, RSS, etc - care to step in? Motive here is purely an informed discussion so that owners can get a broad range of facts and opinions from those who work on these cars the most.
Old 08-16-2012, 01:59 AM
  #15  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CRex

p.s. Think I'll nominate post #7 as "post of the month". Finally, a nugget of solid facts on the subject!!
Yes really great post however he states these are his opinions. Opinions are not facts but I hope for the safety of us all that facts will come out soon.


Quick Reply: Race Shops: Weigh in on CL Reliability?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:05 AM.