Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Lowly GTS Went To Orbit!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2012, 02:19 PM
  #46  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
probably not a bad compromise retaining PASM etc
Rad always says for 600/900 while rest of the world does 700/900 and i always wondered why is that so.
shop i use does not agree with such split at all, he says it is all inherited from 993 cars and 997 cars do not benefit from such big split at all. go figure.
Old 05-02-2012, 02:38 PM
  #47  
Orbit r
Former Vendor
 
Orbit r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by utkinpol
really? tarett sells JRZ RS for a 'stock' 996 spec build suspension set. do they also have KW as an alternative?

PS. I think you are mistaken. just looked at spec doc and it says JRZ RS or grandfathered PSS9 if installed prior to 2010.
KW is one the best suspension manufactures out there. The best teams in the world run them, and we have great success running KWs on our race cars.
People usually compare apples to oranges, as the majority either don't know or don't have access to their motorsports products.
Old 05-02-2012, 02:51 PM
  #48  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by utkinpol
Rad always says for 600/900 while rest of the world does 700/900 and i always wondered why is that so.
shop i use does not agree with such split at all, he says it is all inherited from 993 cars and 997 cars do not benefit from such big split at all. go figure.
Simply, tell your shop and the rest of the world to measure front and rear motion ratio, then tell them to calculate wheel rates, then tell them to read corner weights, then tell them to remove a front and a rear suspension and put it on the scales with wheel/tire weight, then subtract from corner weights, then determine spring rates for the intended frequency.

Bone stock 997.2 GT3 RS (250/600)
Bone stock 996 GT3 (225/550)
Ohlins (700/1300)
Manthey and KW (big split)

Wheel sizes, tires, sway bars then are added into the mix, once you have the baseline.

For instance, my Cayman is running a 550/650 split, because I run the same size front and rear tires (285 at all corners), so I need even more springs on the front axle, and I add even more springs to increase torsional rigidity on the front compared to the rear, to eliminate inside wheel spin (my Coxster doesn't have a diff).
Old 05-02-2012, 02:52 PM
  #49  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,783
Received 3,602 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by utkinpol
Rad always says for 600/900 while rest of the world does 700/900 and i always wondered why is that so.
shop i use does not agree with such split at all, he says it is all inherited from 993 cars and 997 cars do not benefit from such big split at all. go figure.
I recall running a 200 difference between F/R on the 964 and 993 ... seemed to work out ... I can imagine that the 6's and 7's may not benefit from such ...

its all science and art ... beyond me if not most of us...
Old 05-02-2012, 02:56 PM
  #50  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

the 996 GT3 measured ideal split is 600/800, but you can play stiffer/softer depending on tires, and different splits depending on wheel sizes, tire sizes, custom sway bars, weight distribution, Aero, etc.
Old 05-02-2012, 03:05 PM
  #51  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
I recall running a 200 difference between F/R on the 964 and 993 ... seemed to work out ... I can imagine that the 6's and 7's may not benefit from such ...

its all science and art ... beyond me if not most of us...
i found an old note from my builder -

>As I recall I had mentioned we have never set up a 996/7 with a 200lb rate diff.... always have gone 100

i do not have an opinion on those matters due to lack of understanding.

would be interesting to get a car on 800/900 springs and run it against car on 600/900 springs just to see how will it work out.

as i can understand - as you get more aero in front and increase your entrance speed to the max you do need more rigidity on front axle to maintain grip mid-corner, therefore are advices to stiffen up front sway bar and etc. it contradicts with lower speed max grip on corner entrance so that is probably why street cars have soft front springs and race cars have exact opposite but honestly i do not know what to think. i also have heard that TPC sets up race cars with 900/900 springs and also puts in custom very thick front sway bar to stiffen it even more to allow driver (as i understand) to go flat out through the whole corner. or may be i am wrong. i wish somebody could explain all that in simple enough terms an average mechanical engineer could understand.
Old 05-02-2012, 03:51 PM
  #52  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,766
Received 1,567 Likes on 822 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Orbit Racing
KW is one the best suspension manufactures out there. The best teams in the world run them, and we have great success running KWs on our race cars.
People usually compare apples to oranges, as the majority either don't know or don't have access to their motorsports products.
Yup. Now I know why I said KW: I had another client with a 996 GT3 running KW's, at VIR last year. Absoluutely fantastic, fantastic suspension!!
Old 05-02-2012, 03:53 PM
  #53  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Sachs, Penske and Ohlins !!!
Old 05-02-2012, 04:22 PM
  #54  
mdrums
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
Sachs, Penske and Ohlins !!!
Way to expensive...except for you Fiat guys. I bet if Randy or Peter ever put on some coil overs like these you'd never leave them alone...LOL



Quick Reply: Lowly GTS Went To Orbit!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:32 AM.