Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Is dealer right about alignment??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2011, 02:46 PM
  #1  
kyrocks
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
kyrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cyprus and USA
Posts: 4,648
Received 406 Likes on 210 Posts
Default Is dealer right about alignment??

My GT3 is at the dealer waiting for the coolant pipe to come in (burst coolant line at 2200 miles - will post more info later this week) so I thought I would get a more aggressive alignment done for the track. I plan to use the car for 80% track, 20% road. I will have a trailer. I've read the threads on alignment here and coupled with my previous experience, I would like alignment settings as follows (using Pirelli Corsas, or MPSC):

Front: -2.5 camber, 0 toe, 8 caster
Rear: -2.0 camber, 0.15-0.2 toe in per side (0.3-0.4 total)

They said that they usually like more negative camber in the rear and usually set it at a more negative value than the front.

What do you guys think of this? I know I could get a little more negative camber in the rear, but more than the front? I also don't want to wear the inside of the tires too much in the rear.

Thoughts? Thanks.
Old 03-21-2011, 04:31 PM
  #2  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,392
Received 1,643 Likes on 762 Posts
Default

I rate the grip of the MPSC about the same as I run my Toyo RA1.

I run just like you, even less camber rear -1.7 but that may be due to RS.
zero toe in front
2mm toe in per side rear.

I think you're good with what you asked for.
Old 03-21-2011, 05:37 PM
  #3  
va122
Drifting
 
va122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On Rennlist avoiding work
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That's crazy, you want MORE -camber in front. Always.
Old 03-21-2011, 05:45 PM
  #4  
kyrocks
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
kyrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cyprus and USA
Posts: 4,648
Received 406 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

That's what I thought, but I really didn't want to argue with them. I think I'm going to stick with my numbers.
Old 03-21-2011, 05:50 PM
  #5  
NJcroc
Racer
 
NJcroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Your dealer is most likely thinking of regular stock porsche cars. On these you cant achieve enough camber in the front and they run alot more in the rear. the stock settings are almost double in the rear , as they have trouble getting much more than 1 degree up front
Old 03-21-2011, 05:58 PM
  #6  
Viperbob1
Nordschleife Master
 
Viperbob1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8,672
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Ever since the 2 landmark 930 lawsuits in the '80s, Porsche has been OVERLY aggressive in tuning the rear. To that end they also have WAY too much toe in on Rear.

Last edited by Viperbob1; 03-21-2011 at 06:25 PM.
Old 03-21-2011, 06:06 PM
  #7  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,107
Likes: 0
Received 259 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Find yourself a shop that actually runs cup cars.
Old 03-21-2011, 06:10 PM
  #8  
kyrocks
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
kyrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cyprus and USA
Posts: 4,648
Received 406 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tcsracing1
Find yourself a shop that actually runs cup cars.
Not possible in Iowa or Nebraska! Moving to Dallas this July, though...
Old 03-21-2011, 07:58 PM
  #9  
LehmanZ06
Pro
 
LehmanZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 685
Received 99 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

My opinion......go between 2.25 and 2.5 in rear.

With a smaller amount in the rear I wonder if the might oversteer a little more in mid corner.
Old 03-22-2011, 12:08 AM
  #10  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Viperbob1
Ever since the 2 landmark 930 lawsuits in the '80s, Porsche has been OVERLY aggressive in tuning the rear. To that end they also have WAY too much toe in on Rear.
+1 Bob is so correct! I run no more than .14 degrees per side rear toe.

More camber in front than rear. I've been told to keep front to rear around .5 degee of each other. so 2.5 front and 2 rear is fine.

Bob...camber settings?????
Old 03-22-2011, 01:13 AM
  #11  
996FLT6
Rennlist Member
 
996FLT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: san francisco
Posts: 14,313
Received 247 Likes on 203 Posts
Default

Do 7gt3's require less camber then 6gt3's due to better suspension geometry? At 2.5 and 2 rear it's not enuf on track. I find I'm fighting it ^all the time. When I rotated struts plus shims and over 3 it is awesome at the track. Regards. Mike
Old 03-22-2011, 01:19 AM
  #12  
nash
Racer
 
nash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

When you move to Dallas send me a PM and we'll hit the track together. Lots of good shops here to take care of your car(s), too!
Old 03-22-2011, 08:24 AM
  #13  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 256 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

On my 7 GT3 I ran 2.4 neg in the back and corded the inside edge. Went 2.2 in back and tire wear was even with 12 degrees F temp spread across the tread. This may vary depending on the tracks you drive however. This was with Hoosier R6 tires FWIW.
Old 03-22-2011, 09:46 AM
  #14  
FTS
Burning Brakes
 
FTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 901
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Such differing experiences, I'll put my 2 cents:

Just before last weekend, I got a re-alignment: -2.4 f, 0 toe f, -2.5 r, 0.44 r total toe r. Running 888s. 31-33 psi hot pressures.

No understeer to very mild. No oversteer, unless exagerated with throttle. When I checked the tire after event, I could go lower on front pressures, but rears rolled slightly, otherwise very even wear.
Old 03-22-2011, 10:29 AM
  #15  
997gt3north
Drifting
 
997gt3north's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingToaster
Such differing experiences, I'll put my 2 cents:

Just before last weekend, I got a re-alignment: -2.4 f, 0 toe f, -2.5 r, 0.44 r total toe r. Running 888s. 31-33 psi hot pressures.

No understeUer to very mild. No oversteer, unless exagerated with throttle. When I checked the tire after event, I could go lower on front pressures, but rears rolled slightly, otherwise very even wear.
There is no question the car will work perfectly with this alignment but I think you may find that with the R888s specifically with their very stiff sidewalls, once tire wear becomes evident, your inner rears will be the first to go - possibly significantly faster than the outsides. That said, the R888s will almost certainly heat cycle out in the rear before they cord - ie you will find yourself counter steering on turns to save your bacon - be careful of this - it can and will sneak up on you quickly.


Quick Reply: Is dealer right about alignment??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:34 AM.