Crank Pulley... another twist?
#1
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
Crank Pulley... another twist?
hey folks, I was talking to a buddy with a shop with and they were getting a baseline for a stock 997 GT3 on the dyno- guess what? Temps rocket up and they shut things down only to find the belt completely off and the pulley/bolt off too... This car was going to get some parts put on but was completely bone stock at the time and with a dual mass. Sigh I'm still not convinced that the LWF theory is causing this as now it's the second _dual_ mass flywheel car I've heard of this happening to. I'm trying to get the build date and specs on it as well...
#2
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
hey folks, I was talking to a buddy with a shop with and they were getting a baseline for a stock 997 GT3 on the dyno- guess what? Temps rocket up and they shut things down only to find the belt completely off and the pulley/bolt off too... This car was going to get some parts put on but was completely bone stock at the time and with a dual mass. Sigh I'm still not convinced that the LWF theory is causing this as now it's the second _dual_ mass flywheel car I've heard of this happening to. I'm trying to get the build date and specs on it as well...
alex, you come up with some mod to fix these useless cars
#3
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
I seriously wonder if the torque spec was different early on or if indeed they just didn't torque them down to spec properly... or under-estimated. Hard to say but that now makes two _dual mass_ stock 997GT3s I know of and then one RS. We know there are some GT3s with LWFs too that had it happen.
For the 997GT3s, the "fix" (if this is even a fix) is to use the RS pulley, bolt and spacer/washer... oh and some loc-tite
#4
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Trying to gather data to see if maybe it's just the "earlier" cars because the ones I know of were build at the end of 06 early 07... Maybe it was the winter-student-fill-in program?
I seriously wonder if the torque spec was different early on or if indeed they just didn't torque them down to spec properly... or under-estimated. Hard to say but that now makes two _dual mass_ stock 997GT3s I know of and then one RS. We know there are some GT3s with LWFs too that had it happen.
For the 997GT3s, the "fix" (if this is even a fix) is to use the RS pulley, bolt and spacer/washer... oh and some loc-tite
I seriously wonder if the torque spec was different early on or if indeed they just didn't torque them down to spec properly... or under-estimated. Hard to say but that now makes two _dual mass_ stock 997GT3s I know of and then one RS. We know there are some GT3s with LWFs too that had it happen.
For the 997GT3s, the "fix" (if this is even a fix) is to use the RS pulley, bolt and spacer/washer... oh and some loc-tite
maybe i should drive it more, blow it up, since it due to the bolt, i may get a free motor....
keep us posted. my RS is bone stock. should i have dealer chk torque. WHY PCNA got no TSB for this thing.
#5
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
Should be a TSB for this. Same with the RMS, which btw I saw and is _useless_. They need to install the 996 GT3/TT and 997TT seal which very rarely leak with the spring/ring in there instead of the POS 997 teflon one
I'll put the LWF theory to the test shorltly on the RS... 14.5 pounds suddenly became 11.5 pounds!
Trending Topics
#8
I though they did this for the later cars (as of Nov 2007)?