Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

OT: Nissan considering voiding warranty on second-owner GT-Rs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2007, 05:55 PM
  #1  
wilfred
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
wilfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 836
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default OT: Nissan considering voiding warranty on second-owner GT-Rs

Sorry, I know this is off topic but with so many threads on GT2/3/RS going for over MSRP. I thought this is an interesting approach by a manufacturer Your thoughts?

http://www.leftlanenews.com/nissan-c...ner-gt-rs.html

"Nissan is considering voiding the warranty on its upcoming GT-R if the car exchanges hands during the first year it is on the road. There is already a long waiting list for the super-coupe, including many people who intend to sell the car as soon as they take delivery, making a premium over the sticker price. Nissan is considering the move in order to prevent, or at least limit, this from happening.

"That's the route we're looking at," said Scott Vazin, Nissan's director of product public relations. "A warranty decision will be made before the Tokyo auto show." The GT-R is expected to be priced near $70,000 when it hits dealer showrooms."
Old 08-24-2007, 06:37 PM
  #2  
frayed
Race Car
 
frayed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting, though there must be a way to keep the warranty intact for bona fide, non speculator, 1st year transactions.

Perhaps minimum mileage requirements, or some showing of sale for cause (change of financial position). . . but these are probably too hard to legislate.
Old 08-24-2007, 07:03 PM
  #3  
Holger B
Race Car
 
Holger B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SF
Posts: 3,945
Received 87 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Doesn't sound legal to me (after all, you're being charged for the full warranty when you buy the car), but I'm no lawyer.
Old 08-24-2007, 07:08 PM
  #4  
lowside67
Rennlist Member
 
lowside67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,431
Received 38 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

It would be much more simple to make buyer sign a legally binding contract that if they sell the vehicle without legitimate cause within the first 12 months, they agree to pay a stiff fine or something.
Old 08-24-2007, 07:52 PM
  #5  
smack
Track Day
 
smack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: bay area
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i thought i remembered hearing that audi was planning a deterant as well for the upcoming r8.
something to the affect of them having first right of refusal on the car if you are going to sell it.
not sure how they would be able to cap price though so i would think the seller could just ask for a ton just to have audi refuse to rebuy.
i never could really see how they could make this work.
Old 08-24-2007, 09:13 PM
  #6  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,069
Received 1,240 Likes on 607 Posts
Default

This doesn't prevent dealerships from flipping cars though. They still can take a car, drive it as a "demo" and then sell it over sticker or do dealer trades. Cars won't be titled so they should be exempt from warranty issues
Old 08-24-2007, 09:41 PM
  #7  
YA911Fan
Burning Brakes
 
YA911Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A seller can't control or restrict the disposition of an item after the sale. One way around this would be a lease only deal where the seller maintains an ownership interest. I think this is what Ferrari does on some models.

btw, I think there are some exceptions to this rule involving art...
Old 08-24-2007, 10:19 PM
  #8  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,200
Received 5,132 Likes on 2,890 Posts
Default

I can't believe that Nissan won't just build enough cars that flipping them is not profitable - seems like everybody wins that way (except long-term re-sellers, I guess)
Old 08-25-2007, 02:58 PM
  #9  
wilfred
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
wilfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 836
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Come to think of it, I do recall signing some contract when I bought my house that I cannot resell it within 1 year. But I don't know what can the builder do if I do... So I think Nissan can make it legal somehow.

So this will reduce the flippings and like above said, reduce warranty costs for Nissan. And if Nissan can somehow do a fixed price system like they do on Saturn & Scion. It's a win win situation Of course, the only party that loose is the dealer
Old 08-25-2007, 04:58 PM
  #10  
frayed
Race Car
 
frayed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ferrari has been known to make buyers sign a right of first refusal if the car is sold w/i *two years*. Attached is a copy of it.

The reality though, is that if you sell your car in breach of the contract, Ferrari (here, Nissan) isn't going to do schit, and they cannot reposses or otherwise undue the sale. You will be focked next time you try to buy a Ferrari. Those Eyetalians are not gonna fughettaboutit.
Attached Files
File Type: doc
RoFR.doc (24.0 KB, 1835 views)
Old 08-25-2007, 05:34 PM
  #11  
smlporsche
Drifting
 
smlporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA & NC
Posts: 3,082
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frayed
Those Eyetalians are not gonna fughettaboutit.

HEY, u talkin' about me?
Old 08-25-2007, 06:46 PM
  #12  
TT Gasman
Drifting
 
TT Gasman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What they should do is make the warranty valid for the original owner only.
Old 08-25-2007, 08:44 PM
  #13  
richk
Drifting
 
richk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: los angeles and nyc
Posts: 3,240
Received 883 Likes on 366 Posts
Default

my neighbor is a nissan dealer and he confirmed they will void the warranty if the car is sold within the first 12 months
Old 08-25-2007, 10:22 PM
  #14  
nkhalidi
Rennlist Member
 
nkhalidi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC / FL
Posts: 1,314
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YA911Fan
A seller can't control or restrict the disposition of an item after the sale. One way around this would be a lease only deal where the seller maintains an ownership interest. I think this is what Ferrari does on some models.
It's what Ferrari did with the F50 to prevent the kind of speculation that surrounded the F40. F40 prices initially ballooned and then stabilized after a few years, while F50 prices have tottered around the same level since they all came off lease.
Old 08-26-2007, 11:03 AM
  #15  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,518
Received 5,812 Likes on 2,382 Posts
Default

haha, to really prevent speculation, they ought to write into contract, if you dont put 50k miles on the car in year one, they will take the car back and you lose all your money.


Quick Reply: OT: Nissan considering voiding warranty on second-owner GT-Rs



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:15 PM.