Sunroof saga round 2 - PCNA response to my letter
#31
The Rebel
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by Flying Finn
Come on man, you'll fit right in, especially next year when we can even start wearing those Ferrari F1 t-shirts again!
Although I have to warn you, first time you'll show up in front of me with that CS, I'll probably have to punch you, it's so god damn great looking & sounding thing! Wednesday could work. Let's call later today.
Although I have to warn you, first time you'll show up in front of me with that CS, I'll probably have to punch you, it's so god damn great looking & sounding thing! Wednesday could work. Let's call later today.
To punch me first you'd have to catch me
#32
The Rebel
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by ryce
One of the things that makes the 996 gt3 special is the chassis. It bears the c4 chassis that is purportedly seam welded. The suckers are stiff. The cars are built on a special production line.
I've said it before about a 997 with a sunroof; I don't think you can really consider it a gt.
I'm keeping mine.
I've said it before about a 997 with a sunroof; I don't think you can really consider it a gt.
I'm keeping mine.
#33
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Between rock and hard place
Posts: 3,674
Received 1,099 Likes
on
606 Posts
For me it is principle as well. I just want what I want in a car that cost over 100k. I just dont understand why the ROW gets what they want, but here in the USA we get screwed??
BMWNA does not let customers have access to the "Individual" program, yet USA has surpassed Germany as a larger market.
I am still pissed off about the GT3, I still have hope for the RS. If Porsche lets me down on the RS, then f*ck them.
I will be looking for a Cup Car soon and have a M coupe on order. It has no roof and is much more raw then the Cayman and as for looks, I think it is awesome. I did a 2 year lease, so incase I am called even this October for an RS, I am good with it.
BMWNA does not let customers have access to the "Individual" program, yet USA has surpassed Germany as a larger market.
I am still pissed off about the GT3, I still have hope for the RS. If Porsche lets me down on the RS, then f*ck them.
I will be looking for a Cup Car soon and have a M coupe on order. It has no roof and is much more raw then the Cayman and as for looks, I think it is awesome. I did a 2 year lease, so incase I am called even this October for an RS, I am good with it.
#34
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by 94Speedster
I had never experienced PSM until two weeks ago at PDE, and throughly hated it on the skidpad and track. Sure, it would work wonders on a wet/snowy road, but IMHO it has no place on the track. It just felt too controlling.-B
If you are doing everything right, it will not rear it's head..except for a flicker cresting the turn 4 hill at 90+mph
#35
The Rebel
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by cosmos
For me it is principle as well. I just want what I want in a car that cost over 100k. I just dont understand why the ROW gets what they want, but here in the USA we get screwed??
BMWNA does not let customers have access to the "Individual" program, yet USA has surpassed Germany as a larger market.
I am still pissed off about the GT3, I still have hope for the RS. If Porsche lets me down on the RS, then f*ck them.
I will be looking for a Cup Car soon and have a M coupe on order. It has no roof and is much more raw then the Cayman and as for looks, I think it is awesome. I did a 2 year lease, so incase I am called even this October for an RS, I am good with it.
BMWNA does not let customers have access to the "Individual" program, yet USA has surpassed Germany as a larger market.
I am still pissed off about the GT3, I still have hope for the RS. If Porsche lets me down on the RS, then f*ck them.
I will be looking for a Cup Car soon and have a M coupe on order. It has no roof and is much more raw then the Cayman and as for looks, I think it is awesome. I did a 2 year lease, so incase I am called even this October for an RS, I am good with it.
#37
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by ryce
One of the things that makes the 996 gt3 special is the chassis. It bears the c4 chassis that is purportedly seam welded. The suckers are stiff. The cars are built on a special production line.
#38
Rennlist Member
NJ-GT: Your car is absolutely gorgeous. Enjoy it!
MJones: Let me first say that PDE was completely amazing. I should have done that years ago! With regard to PSM, I know that what I said is controversial. I am just a fan of the old school I guess - I like feeling a car's limits and not having it "taken" from me by a computer. Sure, the new technology is certainly safer and may even be a life saver, but I find it less exciting and therefor undesireable.
I first noticed PSM on the skidpad (instructor recommended we activate it) and then it came on a few times on the track as I tried to push the limits of the car. From memory, the first time was the rise after turn 4 (hill crest) when I was off line, and then again later in the day at turn 5 (late braking, with early turn in). I agree with you completely when you infer that driving the track flawlessly should not activate it at all... (Hey, I still occasionally ski on straight skis because they are more fun that the new shapes - and much harder to ski)
And by the way - thanks for all of your posts over the years extolling PDE. I am already planning my next event.
-B
MJones: Let me first say that PDE was completely amazing. I should have done that years ago! With regard to PSM, I know that what I said is controversial. I am just a fan of the old school I guess - I like feeling a car's limits and not having it "taken" from me by a computer. Sure, the new technology is certainly safer and may even be a life saver, but I find it less exciting and therefor undesireable.
I first noticed PSM on the skidpad (instructor recommended we activate it) and then it came on a few times on the track as I tried to push the limits of the car. From memory, the first time was the rise after turn 4 (hill crest) when I was off line, and then again later in the day at turn 5 (late braking, with early turn in). I agree with you completely when you infer that driving the track flawlessly should not activate it at all... (Hey, I still occasionally ski on straight skis because they are more fun that the new shapes - and much harder to ski)
And by the way - thanks for all of your posts over the years extolling PDE. I am already planning my next event.
-B
#40
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
jason is right on. my mech chk'd my two gt3, they are NOT 100% seam welded.
rad, now that's a f'k awesome interior. once you are done with AX competition, weld in a cup car cage, you are set. screw the 997gt3
rad, now that's a f'k awesome interior. once you are done with AX competition, weld in a cup car cage, you are set. screw the 997gt3
#42
Rennlist Member
When you see the 997 GT3 in person as I did... the main body does not look much different that the 996 GT3, really! Bumper covers and the angular 996 GT3 Mark I rear wing are what catch one's eye.
Wheel/tire combination looks the same (yes, I know they are 19").
Wheel/tire combination looks the same (yes, I know they are 19").
#43
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 94Speedster
NJ-GT: Your car is absolutely gorgeous. Enjoy it!
MJones: Let me first say that PDE was completely amazing. I should have done that years ago! With regard to PSM, I know that what I said is controversial. I am just a fan of the old school I guess - I like feeling a car's limits and not having it "taken" from me by a computer. Sure, the new technology is certainly safer and may even be a life saver, but I find it less exciting and therefor undesireable.
MJones: Let me first say that PDE was completely amazing. I should have done that years ago! With regard to PSM, I know that what I said is controversial. I am just a fan of the old school I guess - I like feeling a car's limits and not having it "taken" from me by a computer. Sure, the new technology is certainly safer and may even be a life saver, but I find it less exciting and therefor undesireable.
Besides it has been reported in the press that some form of stability management may be mandated on all vehicles in the US in the future, so better get used to it. Coming to a future GT3 delivered to you....and with a sunroof to boot
I first noticed PSM on the skidpad (instructor recommended we activate it) and then it came on a few times on the track as I tried to push the limits of the car. From memory, the first time was the rise after turn 4 (hill crest) when I was off line, and then again later in the day at turn 5 (late braking, with early turn in). I agree with you completely when you infer that driving the track flawlessly should not activate it at all...
BTW, did the PDE instructors require PSM on?
#44
Rennlist Member
Icon - PDE was awesome. I think I will take some time later this week to recount my experience on the 'list.
MJB - Good point. I do not mean to come across as cocky/aggressive/arrogant, but I do have a pretty good handle on what blows my hair back (perhaps I should have kept those previous posts/thoughts to myself). For me, I want a 911 that can challenge me (i.e. scare me) and demand my complete attention. Having driven 911 SCs, Carrera 3.2s and 964s, I understand that a lot has changed with Porsche over those years. However, those cars were raw. The 996 GT3 was the first of the new water cooled breed that got me excited. All it took was one test drive, and I was hooked. To add to this new addiction, I absolutely LOVE the looks of the 997 GT3, and am still praying that they continued the evolution (which they have on paper) with more HP, better drag coefficient, improvements in stock suspension, and of course the same viseral feel (uh oh... some one noted in a previous thread that this word is a cliche...oops) that I miss from the older 911s.
Until I drive one, all I can do is conjecture. Certainly the hole in the roof was not the right direction. Time will tell.
And thanks for the heads-up regarding the potential for mandatory stability management for future US cars... If that does transpire, then the GT3 Cup will become the weapon of choice.
Thanks!
-B
MJB - Good point. I do not mean to come across as cocky/aggressive/arrogant, but I do have a pretty good handle on what blows my hair back (perhaps I should have kept those previous posts/thoughts to myself). For me, I want a 911 that can challenge me (i.e. scare me) and demand my complete attention. Having driven 911 SCs, Carrera 3.2s and 964s, I understand that a lot has changed with Porsche over those years. However, those cars were raw. The 996 GT3 was the first of the new water cooled breed that got me excited. All it took was one test drive, and I was hooked. To add to this new addiction, I absolutely LOVE the looks of the 997 GT3, and am still praying that they continued the evolution (which they have on paper) with more HP, better drag coefficient, improvements in stock suspension, and of course the same viseral feel (uh oh... some one noted in a previous thread that this word is a cliche...oops) that I miss from the older 911s.
Until I drive one, all I can do is conjecture. Certainly the hole in the roof was not the right direction. Time will tell.
And thanks for the heads-up regarding the potential for mandatory stability management for future US cars... If that does transpire, then the GT3 Cup will become the weapon of choice.
Thanks!
-B