3.8 RS vs 4.0 RS AERO changes
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
3.8 RS vs 4.0 RS AERO changes
Why do I not see more talk about matching the rear wing settings, spring rates, dive planes, camber etc. of the 4.0 to the 3.8? Or do most track guys just eventually end up there anyway? Please hold the learn how to drive first comments . I'm actually very curious. Here is the Excellence Mag info from AP. Educate me..
https://www.excellence-mag.com/issue...3#.Wt5EQWbMz6Y
https://www.excellence-mag.com/issue...3#.Wt5EQWbMz6Y
#2
Why do I not see more talk about matching the rear wing settings, spring rates, dive planes, camber etc. of the 4.0 to the 3.8? Or do most track guys just eventually end up there anyway? Please hold the learn how to drive first comments . I'm actually very curious. Here is the Excellence Mag info from AP. Educate me..
https://www.excellence-mag.com/issue...3#.Wt5EQWbMz6Y
https://www.excellence-mag.com/issue...3#.Wt5EQWbMz6Y
From my experience, on our NorCal tracks, which do not have huge/high speed straight-aways, the addition of aero made a huge difference in lap times but was a bear to balance properly before the car became really enjoyable.
#3
Drifting
Thread Starter
I think aero makes a huge difference, which is why it's so tightly regulated in motorsports. Part of the issue is setup and proving it's effectiveness. Unlike mechanical grip you just have to trust it, which opens it up to variables like driver skill, tire choice, etc.. While logically the process seems straight forward (i.e. more downforce in the back, requires more downforce in the rear) the reality is that it impacts many components of the car, including suspension geometry, required spring rates, specific tire settings/sizing and so on. It seems that for DE most people just stay away from the headache and on the street you can't really feel it regardless.
From my experience, on our NorCal tracks, which do not have huge/high speed straight-aways, the addition of aero made a huge difference in lap times but was a bear to balance properly before the car became really enjoyable.
From my experience, on our NorCal tracks, which do not have huge/high speed straight-aways, the addition of aero made a huge difference in lap times but was a bear to balance properly before the car became really enjoyable.
#4
Agreed and thanks Adi. AP pretty much spells out the what they did to improve high speed aero on the 4.0 from the 3.8. The factory pretty much gets this stuff right. I'm just surprised I don't see more people adopting that set up if it's proven, on to a 3.8. Then again I see guys with Cup wings and no dive planes and every combo under the sun. So I was just curious to see if it was plug in play. It's not lost on me that these changes only make a difference in drivers much much further along the me! I am curious about this stuff however and love to learn..
#5
Rennlist Member
On the assumption that the driver is there to take advantage of the aero:
1. The front splitter is the most important aspect of these cars' aero. Lose that and the car will noticeably understeer in anything beyond low/mid-speed corners.
2. The front dive planes on the 4.0 help. But not nearly as big of a deal as the splitter
3. The two rear wing positions on the street car don't make much difference. More about balancing the FvR if you've added a cup lip or dive planes to the front.
4. 4.0 end plates are larger and increase efficiency by limiting the roll-off from top of your wing to the bottom. Trivial in real life.
So there you go: (1) is the same in the 3.8 and the 4.0; (2)(3)(4) are really marginal improvements.
Now whether a non-pro driver can objectively tell the aero difference between the 3.8 and 4.0 just from driving--that's a completely different matter.
1. The front splitter is the most important aspect of these cars' aero. Lose that and the car will noticeably understeer in anything beyond low/mid-speed corners.
2. The front dive planes on the 4.0 help. But not nearly as big of a deal as the splitter
3. The two rear wing positions on the street car don't make much difference. More about balancing the FvR if you've added a cup lip or dive planes to the front.
4. 4.0 end plates are larger and increase efficiency by limiting the roll-off from top of your wing to the bottom. Trivial in real life.
So there you go: (1) is the same in the 3.8 and the 4.0; (2)(3)(4) are really marginal improvements.
Now whether a non-pro driver can objectively tell the aero difference between the 3.8 and 4.0 just from driving--that's a completely different matter.
#6
Drifting
Thread Starter
On the assumption that the driver is there to take advantage of the aero:
1. The front splitter is the most important aspect of these cars' aero. Lose that and the car will noticeably understeer in anything beyond low/mid-speed corners.
2. The front dive planes on the 4.0 help. But not nearly as big of a deal as the splitter
3. The two rear wing positions on the street car don't make much difference. More about balancing the FvR if you've added a cup lip or dive planes to the front.
4. 4.0 end plates are larger and increase efficiency by limiting the roll-off from top of your wing to the bottom. Trivial in real life.
So there you go: (1) is the same in the 3.8 and the 4.0; (2)(3)(4) are really marginal improvements.
Now whether a non-pro driver can objectively tell the aero difference between the 3.8 and 4.0 just from driving--that's a completely different matter.
1. The front splitter is the most important aspect of these cars' aero. Lose that and the car will noticeably understeer in anything beyond low/mid-speed corners.
2. The front dive planes on the 4.0 help. But not nearly as big of a deal as the splitter
3. The two rear wing positions on the street car don't make much difference. More about balancing the FvR if you've added a cup lip or dive planes to the front.
4. 4.0 end plates are larger and increase efficiency by limiting the roll-off from top of your wing to the bottom. Trivial in real life.
So there you go: (1) is the same in the 3.8 and the 4.0; (2)(3)(4) are really marginal improvements.
Now whether a non-pro driver can objectively tell the aero difference between the 3.8 and 4.0 just from driving--that's a completely different matter.
#7
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
So what I've done on my car is to install the Cup front splitter and 4.0 dive planes in the front. I raised the rear wing by 4" using the Cup uprights but did not change the angle. The wing now operates in much cleaner air and is more efficient even at the stock angle. I'd like a set of the larger 4.0 wing end plates and started a group buy thread to have replicas made (OEM are NLA last time I checked) but there was very little interest...
Trending Topics
#8
So what I've done on my car is to install the Cup front splitter and 4.0 dive planes in the front. I raised the rear wing by 4" using the Cup uprights but did not change the angle. The wing now operates in much cleaner air and is more efficient even at the stock angle. I'd like a set of the larger 4.0 wing end plates and started a group buy thread to have replicas made (OEM are NLA last time I checked) but there was very little interest...
#9
Drifting
Thread Starter
So what I've done on my car is to install the Cup front splitter and 4.0 dive planes in the front. I raised the rear wing by 4" using the Cup uprights but did not change the angle. The wing now operates in much cleaner air and is more efficient even at the stock angle. I'd like a set of the larger 4.0 wing end plates and started a group buy thread to have replicas made (OEM are NLA last time I checked) but there was very little interest...
I remember your thread...
I'm still interested in 4.0 end plates if they can be painted. How many do you need to make it work? My guess is helluva lot more than 2 or 3. In terms of the 4.0 dive planes Suncoast still has them but a crazy *** prices. FVD has copies which I am considering if they are really accurate copies and I can paint them I would consider...
#11
Drifting
Thread Starter
https://www.fvd.net/us-en/FVD505997G...-40-style.html
If you give them your blessing I'll pick up a set as well..
#12
Quite a few of the german 3.8RS I've seen at the 'ring have fitted the dive planes and maxed out the rear wing angle. I really don't think the aero changes are significant at all between the 2 cars.
There is something a bit different for sure on the rear suspension though and seemingly overall damping and optically it did look like the 4.0 has slightly wider front track (although I could have sworn the specs state the same). Was with a friend on track a few weeks ago and he jumped into my car for a (very gentle) go so it was a back to back comparison.
There is something a bit different for sure on the rear suspension though and seemingly overall damping and optically it did look like the 4.0 has slightly wider front track (although I could have sworn the specs state the same). Was with a friend on track a few weeks ago and he jumped into my car for a (very gentle) go so it was a back to back comparison.
#13
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think Crex's comments are correct. I am unsure what you are trying to achieve, but assume it to be better aero grip and balance in general. I still own and have raced 997 cups in IMSA and have a 4.0 street car which i do not track. Both cars chronically understeer. If you think the splitter isn't critical, try losing one mid race at a high speed track and you will come to appreciate it mightily. I've had this happen at Road America and Mosport, the latter particularly unpleasant. I have always wanted to use 4.0 type front dive planes on a cup car to see that they would do, but never could per the regulations. I think any additional downforce up front would help
We have generally found rear wing adjustments to have a modest effect on rear aero grip. A rake adjustment might help you somewhat and we have found a gurney helps stabilize 997s under heavy braking at high speed.
All that said, my experience is limited to the tightly regulated envelope in cup cars and some limited toying around with the 4.0. With an anything goes approach you may have more options. Just bear in mind that each adjustment may solve or improve one problem but induce another. Only trial and error can help you optimize.
We have generally found rear wing adjustments to have a modest effect on rear aero grip. A rake adjustment might help you somewhat and we have found a gurney helps stabilize 997s under heavy braking at high speed.
All that said, my experience is limited to the tightly regulated envelope in cup cars and some limited toying around with the 4.0. With an anything goes approach you may have more options. Just bear in mind that each adjustment may solve or improve one problem but induce another. Only trial and error can help you optimize.
#14
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Here you go..
https://www.fvd.net/us-en/FVD505997G...-40-style.html
If you give them your blessing I'll pick up a set as well..
https://www.fvd.net/us-en/FVD505997G...-40-style.html
If you give them your blessing I'll pick up a set as well..