Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Interesting video talking about the value of the 997.1 with Matt Farah

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2016 | 09:01 AM
  #1  
JayRace's Avatar
JayRace
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati
Default Interesting video talking about the value of the 997.1 with Matt Farah

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-cult...4s-matt-farah/
Old 02-08-2016 | 09:05 AM
  #2  
Quadcammer's Avatar
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,716
Likes: 1,451
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

yeaah, matt farah's input on pretty much anything is not something I need in my life.
Old 02-08-2016 | 10:47 AM
  #3  
Philster's Avatar
Philster
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 7
From: Greater Philadelphia Area, USA
Default

All the buzz words were there, such as 'analogue', so... cringe.

I like my 911, but it's not trying to kill me, and talk of where the engine is at only matters in 10/10ths driving.

I mean, feel free to correct me, but with 750,00 miles of driving enthusiast cars in my life, my 2004 Celica GTS was more 'analogue'. Even loosening up modern electro-nannies still gets you a car with modern dynamics and other built-in safety features.

There is no aura about the 997. It's not analogue. It has light steering and good feedback, and getting the car to squat and dig in with its rear-engined *** is neat, but I'm done with all this analogue nonsense and the talk of 997's being raw yet modern.

Puke.

I like the steering, the squat when pulling out of a corner, and the gearbox/clutch work good and can be taken to new heights. Very good brakes make it complete. But enough with romanticizing the whole rear-engine trying to teach you thing.

Last edited by Philster; 02-08-2016 at 11:56 AM.
Old 02-08-2016 | 11:20 AM
  #4  
Quadcammer's Avatar
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,716
Likes: 1,451
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

that owner made be want to stab my eyes and ears out.
Old 02-08-2016 | 11:36 AM
  #5  
997_Toronto's Avatar
997_Toronto
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 3
From: Toronto
Default

It's just one persons opinion, nothing to lose sleep over.
Old 02-08-2016 | 11:54 AM
  #6  
Little Green's Avatar
Little Green
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 101
From: Hortonville, Wi
Default

Good lord that's terrible. Got about a third of the way through and had to stop.
Old 02-08-2016 | 01:04 PM
  #7  
Para82's Avatar
Para82
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 38
From: Bogota / Navarre Beach
Default

Stellar.

Last edited by Para82; 02-09-2016 at 02:11 AM.
Old 02-08-2016 | 01:36 PM
  #8  
yelloporsche's Avatar
yelloporsche
Advanced
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 4
Default

lol
Old 02-08-2016 | 01:52 PM
  #9  
user 72902's Avatar
user 72902
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Quadcammer
that owner made be want to stab my eyes and ears out.
I wasn't going to watch it but with a review that bad I couldn't resist. Can I use your knife when your done?
Old 02-08-2016 | 02:49 PM
  #10  
JayRace's Avatar
JayRace
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati
Default

haha.. I knew everyone would enjoy it :-)
Old 02-08-2016 | 03:21 PM
  #11  
Carmichael's Avatar
Carmichael
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 974
Likes: 4
From: The Windy City
Default

Damn, that intake sounds good. The car probably has PSE too.

But I know better than to slap an intake on my car. Heatsoak, etc.

... But it sounds so good!
Old 02-09-2016 | 12:27 AM
  #12  
rodH's Avatar
rodH
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 132
From: Orange County
Default

Originally Posted by Philster
All the buzz words were there, such as 'analogue', so... cringe.

I like my 911, but it's not trying to kill me, and talk of where the engine is at only matters in 10/10ths driving.

I mean, feel free to correct me, but with 750,00 miles of driving enthusiast cars in my life, my 2004 Celica GTS was more 'analogue'. Even loosening up modern electro-nannies still gets you a car with modern dynamics and other built-in safety features.

There is no aura about the 997. It's not analogue. It has light steering and good feedback, and getting the car to squat and dig in with its rear-engined *** is neat, but I'm done with all this analogue nonsense and the talk of 997's being raw yet modern.

Puke.

I like the steering, the squat when pulling out of a corner, and the gearbox/clutch work good and can be taken to new heights. Very good brakes make it complete. But enough with romanticizing the whole rear-engine trying to teach you thing.
I think this terminology comes about because of the direction cars are going. Cars like the GTR, and now so many of the cars that use a dual clutch system and have launch control (also, electronic steering) are almost to the point where you are playing a video game (ie-"Digital"). The cars that you have to shift, and have no driver "aides" have more of an "analogue" feel. I think the terminology works quit well, but I would guess that cars that never had any ABS, stability control, would be considered even more "analogue"?

I thought the video was a fun watch. The prices were a little on the low side (not many C4S in $35k range unless they are talking about cars with over 100k miles).

And, yes, I always thought intake was a "no-no" on these cars due to heat soak, and everyone knew that?
Old 02-09-2016 | 12:54 AM
  #13  
chuck911's Avatar
chuck911
Race Car
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,522
Likes: 59
Default

Main thing I want to know, why analog suddenly gets extra British-y vowels? "Analogue?" They're the exact same words, with the exact same meaning. So why suddenly switch from the American "analog" to the British "analogue?" Because if there's no reason, then its pure plain old pretentiousness. Which no I will not give you odds on that.
Old 02-09-2016 | 01:49 AM
  #14  
rodH's Avatar
rodH
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 132
From: Orange County
Default

Originally Posted by chuck911
Main thing I want to know, why analog suddenly gets extra British-y vowels? "Analogue?" They're the exact same words, with the exact same meaning. So why suddenly switch from the American "analog" to the British "analogue?" Because if there's no reason, then its pure plain old pretentiousness. Which no I will not give you odds on that.
same reason I tell my wife that if she had a proper british accent, or even an australian accent, it would instantly give her an "extra" point. Also the same reason all my Navi's are programed with british accents.

Actually, reality is, I freakin spelled it wrong
Old 02-09-2016 | 09:42 AM
  #15  
Philster's Avatar
Philster
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 7
From: Greater Philadelphia Area, USA
Default

Originally Posted by chuck911
Main thing I want to know, why analog suddenly gets extra British-y vowels? "Analogue?" They're the exact same words, with the exact same meaning. So why suddenly switch from the American "analog" to the British "analogue?" Because if there's no reason, then its pure plain old pretentiousness. Which no I will not give you odds on that.
I've always spelled it that way. Colour me pretentious, but it's good theatre. Now, if you don't mind, I have to throw me sack in the boot and get to work.

For the record, Chucky, you have no idea on who does what all day, where they work, where they're from, the languages they speak, the people they interact with, where their laptop was issued, etc.

Since we're labeling people, I consider you ignorant.

CIAO!

(And I'm being sarcastic, because I enjoy your posts, Chuck)


Quick Reply: Interesting video talking about the value of the 997.1 with Matt Farah



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:55 AM.