Interesting video talking about the value of the 997.1 with Matt Farah
#1
Interesting video talking about the value of the 997.1 with Matt Farah
#3
All the buzz words were there, such as 'analogue', so... cringe.
I like my 911, but it's not trying to kill me, and talk of where the engine is at only matters in 10/10ths driving.
I mean, feel free to correct me, but with 750,00 miles of driving enthusiast cars in my life, my 2004 Celica GTS was more 'analogue'. Even loosening up modern electro-nannies still gets you a car with modern dynamics and other built-in safety features.
There is no aura about the 997. It's not analogue. It has light steering and good feedback, and getting the car to squat and dig in with its rear-engined *** is neat, but I'm done with all this analogue nonsense and the talk of 997's being raw yet modern.
Puke.
I like the steering, the squat when pulling out of a corner, and the gearbox/clutch work good and can be taken to new heights. Very good brakes make it complete. But enough with romanticizing the whole rear-engine trying to teach you thing.
I like my 911, but it's not trying to kill me, and talk of where the engine is at only matters in 10/10ths driving.
I mean, feel free to correct me, but with 750,00 miles of driving enthusiast cars in my life, my 2004 Celica GTS was more 'analogue'. Even loosening up modern electro-nannies still gets you a car with modern dynamics and other built-in safety features.
There is no aura about the 997. It's not analogue. It has light steering and good feedback, and getting the car to squat and dig in with its rear-engined *** is neat, but I'm done with all this analogue nonsense and the talk of 997's being raw yet modern.
Puke.
I like the steering, the squat when pulling out of a corner, and the gearbox/clutch work good and can be taken to new heights. Very good brakes make it complete. But enough with romanticizing the whole rear-engine trying to teach you thing.
Last edited by Philster; 02-08-2016 at 11:56 AM.
Trending Topics
#12
All the buzz words were there, such as 'analogue', so... cringe.
I like my 911, but it's not trying to kill me, and talk of where the engine is at only matters in 10/10ths driving.
I mean, feel free to correct me, but with 750,00 miles of driving enthusiast cars in my life, my 2004 Celica GTS was more 'analogue'. Even loosening up modern electro-nannies still gets you a car with modern dynamics and other built-in safety features.
There is no aura about the 997. It's not analogue. It has light steering and good feedback, and getting the car to squat and dig in with its rear-engined *** is neat, but I'm done with all this analogue nonsense and the talk of 997's being raw yet modern.
Puke.
I like the steering, the squat when pulling out of a corner, and the gearbox/clutch work good and can be taken to new heights. Very good brakes make it complete. But enough with romanticizing the whole rear-engine trying to teach you thing.
I like my 911, but it's not trying to kill me, and talk of where the engine is at only matters in 10/10ths driving.
I mean, feel free to correct me, but with 750,00 miles of driving enthusiast cars in my life, my 2004 Celica GTS was more 'analogue'. Even loosening up modern electro-nannies still gets you a car with modern dynamics and other built-in safety features.
There is no aura about the 997. It's not analogue. It has light steering and good feedback, and getting the car to squat and dig in with its rear-engined *** is neat, but I'm done with all this analogue nonsense and the talk of 997's being raw yet modern.
Puke.
I like the steering, the squat when pulling out of a corner, and the gearbox/clutch work good and can be taken to new heights. Very good brakes make it complete. But enough with romanticizing the whole rear-engine trying to teach you thing.
I thought the video was a fun watch. The prices were a little on the low side (not many C4S in $35k range unless they are talking about cars with over 100k miles).
And, yes, I always thought intake was a "no-no" on these cars due to heat soak, and everyone knew that?
#13
Main thing I want to know, why analog suddenly gets extra British-y vowels? "Analogue?" They're the exact same words, with the exact same meaning. So why suddenly switch from the American "analog" to the British "analogue?" Because if there's no reason, then its pure plain old pretentiousness. Which no I will not give you odds on that.
#14
Main thing I want to know, why analog suddenly gets extra British-y vowels? "Analogue?" They're the exact same words, with the exact same meaning. So why suddenly switch from the American "analog" to the British "analogue?" Because if there's no reason, then its pure plain old pretentiousness. Which no I will not give you odds on that.
Actually, reality is, I freakin spelled it wrong
#15
Main thing I want to know, why analog suddenly gets extra British-y vowels? "Analogue?" They're the exact same words, with the exact same meaning. So why suddenly switch from the American "analog" to the British "analogue?" Because if there's no reason, then its pure plain old pretentiousness. Which no I will not give you odds on that.
For the record, Chucky, you have no idea on who does what all day, where they work, where they're from, the languages they speak, the people they interact with, where their laptop was issued, etc.
Since we're labeling people, I consider you ignorant.
CIAO!
(And I'm being sarcastic, because I enjoy your posts, Chuck)