Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Seriously looking at purchase of 997, need advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2013, 10:14 AM
  #31  
DoubleA
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
DoubleA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the insight. Carbon build-up issue aside, I will continue to look at the .2's...
Old 01-17-2013, 10:22 AM
  #32  
DoubleA
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
DoubleA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris from Cali
I had an '09 C4S, but PDK put me off. Now I'm back to a 997.1 with manual. I'm very happy with my decision. The biggest advantage for me with the 997.2 was the improved interior (switches, PCM, etc.).
Interesting because I was convinced by a dealer to go in and try the PDK. I am a manual guy but having said that, I have never driven the pdk (which was the dealers point). So, I was going to go give it a spin. I also read that the next GT3 will be pdk ONLY! Suppose if I am on the track and looking to drop a half-second on my lap times, sure but I think I enjoy pulling off a perfect heel-toe down-shift manually even if its once every 100 tries.
Old 01-17-2013, 10:42 AM
  #33  
rodsky
Rennlist Member
 
rodsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Los Angeles & Truckee, CA
Posts: 3,971
Received 843 Likes on 572 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DoubleA
Thanks for all the insight. Carbon build-up issue aside, I will continue to look at the .2's...
There has been no issues on this front. I'd much rather take my chances with this (and the DFI engine that is Porsche's 911 future since 2009) than RMS/IMS which is a factual (albeit) minor concern.

I'm damn impressed with my 997.2 PDK. My fourth 911 - first PDK and first DFI. Best one to date.
Old 01-17-2013, 06:09 PM
  #34  
Chris from Cali
Race Car
 
Chris from Cali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Not to beat the horse to death, I never said 997.2 was a bad choice. Quite the opposite. When I picked up my latest 997, I was most interested in the specific color, manual trans, and manual sports seats. This car popped up (CPO), so I moved on it. If the identical car (esp. with sport buckets!) had popped up in 997.2 guise, I would have bought it. As for my faith in Porsche's engineering, I wouldn't be on my 4th Porsche in 7 years if I didn't trust them. I was merely trying to point out one of the few downsides of DFI...
Old 01-17-2013, 07:33 PM
  #35  
pissedpuppy
Nordschleife Master
 
pissedpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 5,260
Received 490 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sqweak
Why would you tell someone to avoid an engine with improved economy, higher power, and eliminated IMS/RMS issues?
1st - most don't drive a P-car for its "economy" - so that's BS on your part
2nd - the IMS/RMS issues are totally overblown. totally
3rd - the "so called power" is negligible
4 - the same reason I like a 6sp manual tranny, I just don't care for direct fuel injection
5 - i think its funny as hell to watch guys like you get all wound up

now, if you're taking a position from a better motor stand point, then lets be honest and tell him to get a GT3 with the mezger engine

there, that's why
Old 01-17-2013, 08:53 PM
  #36  
wwest
Drifting
 
wwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: redmond wa
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CAVU
With an open mind I ask, why would the DFI engine incure anymore carbon build up than and manifold injection?
Not exactly on point, but a good point anyway.

SFI engines are subject to carbon buildup, LOTS of it, due to EGR, exhaust gas residue being recirculated into the intake manifold. I should take pictures of the inside of my 1995 LS400 intake manifold w/260,000 miles. The only thing new with DFI is that the EGR residue now also cakes on the intake side of the intake valves.

A throttle body injector, or 2, just downstream of the MAF/IAT, and used only during engine idle, would solve both problems
Old 01-17-2013, 08:58 PM
  #37  
wwest
Drifting
 
wwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: redmond wa
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris from Cali
It has been a big problem in DFI RS4s and BMWs (cars from 2007 or so). Unless Porsche has a magic trick, it'll get the same issue. Here's some scoop:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCUpSyuUPqY
More SNAKE OIL.

Real problem, poor solution.
Old 01-17-2013, 09:28 PM
  #38  
Chris from Cali
Race Car
 
Chris from Cali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I guess you didn't bother reading the rest of the explanation below that post before firing from the hip....
Old 01-19-2013, 07:26 AM
  #39  
trcox57
Instructor
 
trcox57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chesapeake Beach, MD
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

+1 on the PPI(well worth the piece of mind) and according to other threads and a guy I know in the business, CARFAX isn't a guarantee of anything. I saw in another thread that a car with clean report had new paint all over it. The comment was high end shops can't be bothered with Carfax reporting.
Good luck with the purchase..you are gonna love it!
Old 01-19-2013, 09:01 AM
  #40  
Spokane5150
Banned
 
Spokane5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

+1

Originally Posted by pissedpuppy
1st - most don't drive a P-car for its "economy" - so that's BS on your part
2nd - the IMS/RMS issues are totally overblown. totally
3rd - the "so called power" is negligible
4 - the same reason I like a 6sp manual tranny, I just don't care for direct fuel injection
5 - i think its funny as hell to watch guys like you get all wound up

now, if you're taking a position from a better motor stand point, then lets be honest and tell him to get a GT3 with the mezger engine

there, that's why
Old 01-19-2013, 09:33 AM
  #41  
nylezengch98
6th Gear
 
nylezengch98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good luck with your decision.
Old 01-19-2013, 12:44 PM
  #42  
rodsky
Rennlist Member
 
rodsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Los Angeles & Truckee, CA
Posts: 3,971
Received 843 Likes on 572 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pissedpuppy
Originally Posted by sqweak
Why would you tell someone to avoid an engine with improved economy, higher power, and eliminated IMS/RMS issues?
1st - most don't drive a P-car for its "economy" - so that's BS on your part
2nd - the IMS/RMS issues are totally overblown. totally
3rd - the "so called power" is negligible
4 - the same reason I like a 6sp manual tranny, I just don't care for direct fuel injection
5 - i think its funny as hell to watch guys like you get all wound up

now, if you're taking a position from a better motor stand point, then lets be honest and tell him to get a GT3 with the mezger engine

there, that's why
Pot meet kettle.

Power difference was not negligible to me. That's why i didn't "upgrade" my 40th to a .1S. There wasn't a discernible performance difference between them. There was a noticeable difference that you could feel going to the .2S.
Old 01-19-2013, 02:55 PM
  #43  
pissedpuppy
Nordschleife Master
 
pissedpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 5,260
Received 490 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rodsky
Pot meet kettle.

Power difference was not negligible to me. That's why i didn't "upgrade" my 40th to a .1S. There wasn't a discernible performance difference between them. There was a noticeable difference that you could feel going to the .2S.
Hmmm, my 996 to 997 was noticeably different, both S's, but not a 40th
Old 01-19-2013, 03:52 PM
  #44  
Jasper1
Advanced
 
Jasper1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 2 cents. They are all great cars and will bring the same smiles to your face. If you can afford the newest and more powerful, then fantastic. If your budget takes you to a .1, it is just as wonderful a car as a .2 or a 991, the basic formula is still magical. Everyone should just relax
Old 01-19-2013, 04:24 PM
  #45  
CAVU
Rennlist Member
 
CAVU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,909
Received 375 Likes on 276 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jasper1
My 2 cents. They are all great cars and will bring the same smiles to your face. If you can afford the newest and more powerful, then fantastic. If your budget takes you to a .1, it is just as wonderful a car as a .2 or a 991, the basic formula is still magical. Everyone should just relax
+1


Quick Reply: Seriously looking at purchase of 997, need advice



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:01 AM.