Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997.1 vs 997.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2018, 11:51 AM
  #31  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

I want all the performance of a Porsche with the reliability of a Toyota. Am I asking for too much?
Old 08-16-2018, 12:16 PM
  #32  
Petersa9
Rennlist Member
 
Petersa9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 442
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I’ve had 2 996’s and now a 997.2 C4S with PDK. If your budget allows for it go with a 997.2. Otherwise find a well sorted and documented 997.1. I wouldn’t track a m96/97 engine because of the failures noted.
Old 08-16-2018, 12:25 PM
  #33  
Bruce In Philly
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Bruce In Philly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 5,990
Likes: 0
Received 1,419 Likes on 861 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NuttyProfessor
I want all the performance of a Porsche with the reliability of a Toyota. Am I asking for too much?
Yes.

First, when a Camry breaks, the cost to fix is going to be way lower than a Porsche on average (reasons: way lower volumes therefore higher unit costs and just because they can)
2 - Camrys are designed to be driven by the average person (a knucklehead) so some design aspects are compromised such as performance as tolerances are such to allow for starting up in sub-zero temps and flooring it.
C - Differences in market demands.... The market demands a low cost, long lasting Camery..... Porsche market demands that other look at them when they yell "Look at me! Look at me!"

Peace
Bruce in Philly
Old 08-16-2018, 12:34 PM
  #34  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bruce In Philly
Yes.

First, when a Camry breaks, the cost to fix is going to be way lower than a Porsche on average (reasons: way lower volumes therefore higher unit costs and just because they can)
2 - Camrys are designed to be driven by the average person (a knucklehead) so some design aspects are compromised such as performance as tolerances are such to allow for starting up in sub-zero temps and flooring it.
C - Differences in market demands.... The market demands a low cost, long lasting Camery..... Porsche market demands that other look at them when they yell "Look at me! Look at me!"

Peace
Bruce in Philly
Thank you. Makes sense. But I'm an average person that wants to daily drive a Porsche fast so that I can get around all those stupid Prius cars on the roads screaming, "Kiss my bumperettes!!!"
Old 08-17-2018, 05:59 AM
  #35  
Zoefhaus
Racer
 
Zoefhaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Belgium
Posts: 328
Received 46 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Get a 997.1 built after mid-2006 and save some money for nice upgrades/tires/maintenance.
The "major problems" you read about on the forums are mostly internet phenomena; talk to any Porsche specialist (except those selling preventive measures of course) and they will confirm.

If you believe all the internet-talk, you would not dare to buy any car whatsoever (997.2 has pdk-issues, I am sure there are plenty of "issues" to be found with 991's as well, etc. etc.).

Besides, the 997.1 sounds way better than the 997.2, and that's a lot more important
Old 08-17-2018, 06:03 PM
  #36  
Hi-Arc
Rennlist Member
 
Hi-Arc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 524
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Go with the 997.2 MT ! Gen 2 DFI Motor is awesome
Old 08-18-2018, 03:08 AM
  #37  
sandwedge
Nordschleife Master
 
sandwedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,456
Received 1,008 Likes on 716 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fined
This stuff isn't particularly mysterious guys.. 911 which cost less up front have reasons why. Like anything else you pay money for. You get the option of;

1. Paying more up front for a newer car (with a reliable engine that doesn't have known problems) and piece of mind
2. Paying less up front for an older car with a number of known engine problems which may not ever impact your ownership. The likelihood of those problems is small.
3. Paying less up front for an older car and doing preventative maintenance that may or may not protect you from an engine failure

IMS, bore scoring, timing chain failure..

Think of what'll happen if you have an engine failure. Its not like you just pay for your engine to be fixed.. you're going to be without use of your car for months, possibly even a year or two if you have it rebuilt by well known top talent engine builders. On the other hand there could be $15-20k difference in price. But if you have your engine rebuilt for $15k due to a failure did you save the money? Or did you just buy an older car and end up paying the same you could have paid for the newer car that will always be worth more money.

I certainly would not want to be driving around in a 997.1 that I paid $30k for initially, engine fails, cars down 8 months, pay $20k for a quality rebuild.. now I have a $50k 2007 Carrera S that I can sell for $36k...
Great summary. Especially since it discreetly points out that the IMS issue isn't eliminated if you buy a mid year -06 or later or something along those lines. There are well documented IMS failures for every model year 997 with IMS bearings so the problem was not eliminated until the IMS itself was eliminated with the introduction of the new 9A1 DFI engine starting with the 2009 model year cars. I'm not delusional, thinking that engine can't fail but I can't recall reading or hearing about the failure of a 9A1 engine. Plenty of stories about failures of its predecessor though.



Quick Reply: 997.1 vs 997.2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:02 PM.