Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

996 vs. 997, but then which 997?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2013, 12:14 PM
  #61  
USMC_DS1
Drifting
 
USMC_DS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,024
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slideruyle
So what does frequent oil changes have to do with this issue?
Some of us cut the paper filter during an oil change to inspect for any signs of IMS and/or any engine issues... you're looking for metal or plastic bits. Some will also send in their oil for analysis. If the bearing seals goes then clean oil may save you for a short time. Btw has anyone tried the LNE IMS Guardian? Also someone please point us to a definitive case of the new IMS causing this issue.
Old 02-06-2013, 12:16 PM
  #62  
P0rsch3F113
Three Wheelin'
 
P0rsch3F113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: between TO and Barrie
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
@Joe, to ensure you get M97 engine, just buy a car that has build date of later in 2006, or just get a 2007!
My car's build date is 02/2006 and I have the M97 engine (checked the numbers). Why get one built later in 2006 (don't understand)?
Old 02-06-2013, 02:24 PM
  #63  
Cloudspin
Rennlist Member
 
Cloudspin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 916
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Palmbeacher
The local Porsche dealer here (Champion) uses 5W-40, I think it's a Pennzoil product. They (and their Champion Motorsports division) recommend it for warmer climates like ours. Given that your climate in Austin is also warm, I'd think the same applies. I don't see how an authorized Porsche dealer could promote violating Porsche's specifications, so I have to believe Porsche doesn't forbid anything but Mobil One 0-40, even if they have some contractual deal to promote it.

My indie, a race-engine-building shop, carries Mobil One, but it's also 5W-40, not 0W-40. They also carry some German oil they use for racing.
Orbit?
Old 03-12-2013, 02:31 PM
  #64  
smongiovi
Track Day
 
smongiovi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2008 997C4S IMS question

I currently own a 1991 C2 Cabriolet and I am considering purchasing a 2008 C4S. I'm aware that 996/997's have an 'isssue' with RMS and IMS bearing failures. From all I've read I can't really tell if the IMS/RMS bearing problem is specific to certain model years. Can anyone shed light on this?

Specifically, I want to know if IMS failure is a known/chronic problem with the 2008 C4S model year.

Any reply/advice would be much appreciated
Old 03-29-2013, 11:57 PM
  #65  
Gooddog
Track Day
 
Gooddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Late MY-05 987

I have a late MY-05 987 Boxster S with a M-97 motor. It's IMS bearing has failed at 40k miles. I think we'll find that this beefier IMS band aid solution was a flawed design as well. It was short lived for a reason. A lot of the failures of these more recent cars have been masked by repair solutions under warranty. As these cars fall out of warranty, the IMS problems for this series will surface as well.



Originally Posted by MLindgren
The change was implemented midway through the '05 MY. ALL 2006 cars and later production '05 cars had the change which minimized the IMS failure (I personally have never seen/read of a failed IMS on an '06 or later car).
Old 03-30-2013, 12:57 AM
  #66  
cvtbenhogan
Rennlist Member
 
cvtbenhogan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Downers Grove, Illinois
Posts: 1,119
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pewter82
If non 911 owners would listen to some of you, nobody would every buy a 997...

It's hard to justify paying more for a 07-08 997, if its the same car as the 05-06. The DFI 09 and newer, you could make a case, but the premium for a 997.2 over a 05-06 997.1 is large, without a huge performance gain, excluding the PDK.

The 05 engine problems are very very small, and just about any make or model has something that's come up. Read the TSB's on Honda's , MB's, Toyota's ect.

If you have worries, buy a warranty.
On board with every bit of this.
Old 03-30-2013, 01:31 PM
  #67  
Wormer
Rennlist Member
 
Wormer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Elmhurst, IL (USA)
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Addict,

I have a 2002 996 and read all about the IMS issue. My 996 does not leak a drop of oil and it has a magnitized oil plug in it which is checked once a year to see if any metal filings from the IMS shows up. I was thinking of moving up to a 997, perhaps a '06, '07 or '08. Would I have the same IMS issue with those non-turbo engines?

Your thoughts please?

From a glider pilot in Ohio
Old 03-31-2013, 12:07 AM
  #68  
mgordon18
Rennlist Member
 
mgordon18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 1,616
Received 241 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wormer
Addict,

I have a 2002 996 and read all about the IMS issue. My 996 does not leak a drop of oil and it has a magnitized oil plug in it which is checked once a year to see if any metal filings from the IMS shows up. I was thinking of moving up to a 997, perhaps a '06, '07 or '08. Would I have the same IMS issue with those non-turbo engines?

Your thoughts please?

From a glider pilot in Ohio
Hi Wormer - welcome to the board! You really should try doing a search on this forum for "IMS." Try not to drown in the posts.

The short answer is this: For 997s the IMS setup changed over from the "old" design to the "new" design around Feb 2005. This means that later-build MY05 cars have the new design, as do all 06, 07 and 08 cars.

We've heard of multiple failures fromt the "old" design IMS bearings. I haven't heard of any proven "new" bearing failures. The "new" design is supposed to be much more resilient.

So technically, you'll still have a possible IMS issue in an 06, 07, or 08 engine, since the IMS and its bearings still exist in the engine, but so far this board has not seen a proven failure from the "new" design.
Old 03-31-2013, 12:15 AM
  #69  
mgordon18
Rennlist Member
 
mgordon18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 1,616
Received 241 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gooddog
I have a late MY-05 987 Boxster S with a M-97 motor. It's IMS bearing has failed at 40k miles. I think we'll find that this beefier IMS band aid solution was a flawed design as well. It was short lived for a reason. A lot of the failures of these more recent cars have been masked by repair solutions under warranty. As these cars fall out of warranty, the IMS problems for this series will surface as well.
Hi Gooddog,

Are you sure you have the "new" design IMS? How do you know? If you did, in fact, have the new design, you will represent the first failure of that bearing setup that we've heard of here on the board. I'm not saying you're lyin' - I just want to make sure!

Let us know...
Old 03-31-2013, 06:03 PM
  #70  
DoninDen
Three Wheelin'
 
DoninDen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,406
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flavorflavorflav
guys, I appreciate all the wisdom.

I have purchased a 05 997 with an m97 motor --car build date 2/05--from my research, it was built 600 engines BEFORE the beefier ims upgrade may have gone into effect.

Going to take it in for a ppi tomorrow.

I got a good deal and love the car.

But I have the ability to return the car by Thursday and get my money back--on general principles I could, and just wait for another deal, and get an 06 or 07. For that matter, could also plunk down some more money to just be safe (997.2?)

I just want to be able to sleep at night and won't be for the next couple nights until I figure out what I should do.

Thanks in advance for any advise. It's do or die decision time for me!
The only occurrences of an IMS bearing failure on this board or 6speedonline have been with the earlier engine, which the car you are considering apparently has. (Both boards have threads where owners can report if they have had an IMS failure*). The OP on this thread's point was isn't the earlier version of the engine better because the IMS bearings can be replaced and in the newer models (like my '07), they can't. That's an interesting point and so far the answer seems to be the new IMS bearing is working...

To answer your question on whether you should buy this car, I think the answer is yes, as long as you check out or replace the IMS bearing as a condition of purchase. Ask to have the oil changed and oil filter inspected for metal shavings -or- to split the cost of installing a LN Enginerring IMS bearing. This way you will not need to worry if the IMS is on the verge of going out.

But buy the car knowing that when you sell the car, you will have the perceived IMS issue with a few buyers, that should be solved with showing you had the IMS bearing replaced. In truth the failure rate appears so low, that with the IMS bearing upgrade you will be in great shape with this car.

There does not seem to be a definitive percentage as to what the IMS failure rate on early '05 models is, but it is considered very low. Some early '05 owners have stated on the boards that because it is so low they are not concerned, but if it was me, I would have it changed for the peace of mind. And you will have a wonderful car.

I don't know if the IMS bearing upgrade is a onetime fix, how long the LN bearing holds a warrantee or if it needs to be subsequently replaced and checked overtime.

As far as the newer 997.1 models with the larger IMS bearings, there have been zero documented IMS failures to date and there are cars out there with well over 100,000 miles on them. I hope it's not a problem that will be slow to turn up and believe we all are watching for this on the boards pretty intently. Porsche's decision to a replace a bearing that had a rare propensity to failure with a bearing that could not be serviced without completely tearing down the engine was either based on arrogance or a very strong belief that the bearing would well out live the life of the vehicle. The zero occurrence rate so far is the strongest indicator that it was a true fix, beyond any unsubstantiated opinions.

*Both boards have threads where owners can report if they have had an IMS failure. I think this is a great way to track the issue because I would suspect the vast majority of those who have their engines shredded because of the IMS would Google for an idea of what has happened and find the boards. An uninteneded result of this query is that instead of only those who have experienced a failure posting, every Tom, Dick and Harry seem to want to post that they have not had any problems, so the threads have a great volume of unneeded responses and are hard to read. But so far there have been zero posts of a larger IMS bearing failure.

Did you buy the car?

Last edited by DoninDen; 03-31-2013 at 07:40 PM.
Old 03-31-2013, 06:08 PM
  #71  
pissedpuppy
Nordschleife Master
 
pissedpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 5,260
Received 490 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smongiovi
I currently own a 1991 C2 Cabriolet and I am considering purchasing a 2008 C4S. I'm aware that 996/997's have an 'isssue' with RMS and IMS bearing failures. From all I've read I can't really tell if the IMS/RMS bearing problem is specific to certain model years. Can anyone shed light on this?

Specifically, I want to know if IMS failure is a known/chronic problem with the 2008 C4S model year.

Any reply/advice would be much appreciated
Definitely not a chronic problem!



Quick Reply: 996 vs. 997, but then which 997?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:46 AM.