When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The cover story for the October issue of Motor Trend is a comparison of 10 high performance cars including cars like the Corvette ZR1, Audi R8, and Shelby GT500.
"The winner will be a car that delivers a balance of useable performance, accessible handling, and driver-friendly design; a vehicle with a multidimensional personality that will delight and reward the enthusiast driver on any road at any time, regardless of weather and traffic conditions."
The winner? The Cayman S!!!
(They didn't have the 911 in the "test")
Any road, any time, regardless of weather and traffic? ... C4S PDK.
Take a Caymen S and a 997S that are about as comparable as possible (same year, same options, same transmission, etc.) and ask the Cayman owner if he'd trade his car straight up for the 997S. Ask the owner of the 997S if he'd trade his car for a similar Cayman S. I think most of us would know the answer in these two situations. Pretty much sums up my answer to this dilemma.
Take a Caymen S and a 997S that are about as comparable as possible (same year, same options, same transmission, etc.) and ask the Cayman owner if he'd trade his car straight up for the 997S. Ask the owner of the 997S if he'd trade his car for a similar Cayman S. I think most of us would know the answer in these two situations. Pretty much sums up my answer to this dilemma.
Yeah, I don't get that scenario either. Even someone who preferred the Cayman would take that trade. Then they could sell the 997S and buy a better Cayman S. I prefer the 911 but it's myopic to assume that that's a universal preference. Plenty of people prefer mid-engined handling and there isn't a wrong answer when choosing between the two cars.
No, not about the money. I think there's already been a few responses on the last 5 pages stating that it's not about a money issue. That's why I used the example of trading one car for another straight up (no trades and pocketing money options, etc.). For me, it's about the "soul" of the Porsche heritage/lineage.
Take a Caymen S and a 997S that are about as comparable as possible (same year, same options, same transmission, etc.) and ask the Cayman owner if he'd trade his car straight up for the 997S. Ask the owner of the 997S if he'd trade his car for a similar Cayman S. I think most of us would know the answer in these two situations. Pretty much sums up my answer to this dilemma.
I'm one of these guys... traded a Cayman S for a 997.2 C4S... Completely different dynamics and power. The CS handled better. The 997.2 has much more power and I really love to drive it.
For me, it's about the "soul" of the Porsche heritage/lineage.
There is no doubt that the 40 years of 911 heritage has earned the respect it gets in the Porsche and world-at-large community, but to not equally respect the heritage of the mid-engine Porsche which pre-dates the rear-engine design is a mistake.
I would trade my beloved C2S in a heartbeat for this Cayman S.
506rwhp 400+ft/lbs rwt
JRZ's, GT3 brakes - it's awesome!
Most probably would but what I stated was, "Take a Caymen S and a 997S that are about as comparable as possible (same year, same options, same transmission, etc.) and ask the Cayman owner if he'd trade his car straight up for the 997S. Ask the owner of the 997S if he'd trade his car for a similar Cayman S."
I wonder if your 997S was optioned out the way this Caymen S is, would you still be making the trade in a heartbeat?
There is no doubt that the 40 years of 911 heritage has earned the respect it gets in the Porsche and world-at-large community, but to not equally respect the heritage of the mid-engine Porsche which pre-dates the rear-engine design is a mistake.
Same goes for the diesel tractors. Or Ferdinand Porsche's hybrid designs.
Can we just say they 911 and Cayman are different and avoid a 'better' label? Fratricide is ugly.
That's kind of a silly comparison as others have pointed out.
IIRC the guy with the turbo Cayman has roughly $150K into it.
My C2S had a sticker of ~ 100K
A comparably equipped Cayman S would be what - 75-80K?
Who wouldn't take the pricey car and sell it?
This is what I said in my post #65 above:
"No, not about the money. I think there's already been a few responses on the last 5 pages stating that it's not about a money issue. That's why I used the example of trading one car for another straight up (no trades and pocketing money options, etc.). For me, it's about the "soul" of the Porsche heritage/lineage."
Driven one. Nice car and it does drive well. Chased one on a rally two weeks ago just outside of Salem as well and I had to focus to keep up. Again, nice car. One of my close friends also has one. He likes it but looks at it as a stepping stone before moving up to a 997. End of the day, we all have our own opinions and that's just my two cents.
Stunning Porsche 356A Super GT Speedster Auction Fails to Meet Reserve
Slideshow: One of the rarest Porsche 356 Speedsters ever built has resurfaced, offering a glimpse into a little-known chapter of the model's competition history.
Theon Goes Full Carbon Fiber With Stunning New Build
Slideshow: Built around a carbon-bodied 964 and a naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six, this bespoke commission highlights how far the restomod formula has evolved.
Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes
Slideshow: A Polish Porsche specialist is moving ahead with one of the most unusual 911 conversions in recent memory: a shooting brake version of the 991-generation sports car.
This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917
Slideshow: A Porsche Carrera GT has been transformed into a one-off coachbuilt machine that blends analog supercar engineering with styling inspired by the legendary 917 race cars.
Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?
Slideshow: A heavily modified Porsche Cayenne convertible with faux wood trim and a long list of flaws recently sold at auction for surprisingly little money.