Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone Regret Buying a PDK?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2009, 12:20 AM
  #91  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

There is no delay when shifting a PDK, put it in manual mode and sport mode and it will bang them off as...turn on the PLUS Chrono mode and it will change gears faster than a Ferrari.

Originally Posted by afridi
I drove a Maserati a few yrs ago which had the Ferrari paddle shifter. Was very intuitive and not complicated to drive.

I drove the PDK today for the first time. In auto it was smooth and surprisingly good.

In manual I had to think every time "push or pull" whether I was usingthe stick or the rather silly buttons.

Personally I would prefer paddles. But I could live with the buttons ifit was pull for "up" and push for "down" just like one would expect in a sequential shifter. At least to me, on the track as you are braking hard with the momentum going forwards, if you have to be pulling or pushing things, its better to "push" and vice versa.

In manual mode it seemed to have a delay in shifting gears and was odd. Almost as if I had to predict where it would actually shift. Maybe this is lack of familiarity, or maybe I needed sport plus on, I dont know. OTOH inmanual, if I lifted as I changed gears if felt more normal.
Old 03-22-2009, 01:43 AM
  #92  
boolala
Race Car
 
boolala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,019
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by afridi
...... At least to me, on the track as you are braking hard with the momentum going forwards, ....
Just a tiny technical note here but if you are decelerating then your momentum vector is actually pointing "backward" i.e., opposite in direction to your velocity.
Old 03-22-2009, 01:48 AM
  #93  
ADias
Nordschleife Master
 
ADias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southwest
Posts: 8,309
Received 395 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boolala
Just a tiny technical note here but if you are decelerating then your momentum vector is actually pointing "backward" i.e., opposite in direction to your velocity.
For the car yes there is a force opposite its velocity vector, but for the driver his momentum is forward... the driver is an isolated body without brakes, except his seatbelt...

Last edited by ADias; 03-22-2009 at 04:07 AM.
Old 03-22-2009, 03:02 AM
  #94  
PAULSPEED
Pro
 
PAULSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SAN CARLOS, CALIFORNIA
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you kidding!!! Best thing I ever bought in
my life. This car is the best car I have ever owned.
Paul
Old 03-22-2009, 04:32 AM
  #95  
boolala
Race Car
 
boolala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,019
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
For the car yes there is a force opposite its velocity vector, but for the driver his momentum is forward... the driver is an isolated body without brakes, except his seatbelt...
The momemtum of the driver is in a net negative direction too as his forward speed before being restrained is tiny compared to the cars deceleration.
Old 03-22-2009, 05:09 AM
  #96  
ADias
Nordschleife Master
 
ADias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southwest
Posts: 8,309
Received 395 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boolala
The momemtum of the driver is in a net negative direction too as his forward speed before being restrained is tiny compared to the cars deceleration.
My friend... when you brake hard your body is pushed forward... at least in the Newtonian gravity field we live in.
Old 03-22-2009, 04:51 PM
  #97  
boolala
Race Car
 
boolala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,019
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Of course we're talking about the change in momentum as the your forward momemtum is always positive unless you are in reverse gear.

My point is that within a fraction of a second you are restrained by the seatbelt and the change in momentum for both the vechicle and the occupant is rearwards.
Old 03-22-2009, 07:59 PM
  #98  
lockmk
Track Day
 
lockmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Eh? Right car..?

"While the manual is absolutely great in light to no traffic, especially on a winding road, I was hardly ever getting a chance to do that with my 07, and trust me, it is no fun driving a manual in Houston traffic.

With my new 09, the PDK not only takes away the tediousness of continually manually shifting in stop-and-go traffic, but it is fantastic for allowing me to quickly maneuver when an opening presents itself.

It would still be nice to have a manual transmission-equipped car to play with, but I am getting far more use from the 09 C2S PDK than I ever did with the 07 C2S and really now almost look forward to my daily 22 mile one-way commute."

This really puzzled me. If you rarely encounter light traffic or winding roads it seems your Porsche problem is not the transmission, it's where you live and how you use the car. I'm not sure I would be choosing a 911 primarily for commuting in heavy traffic...
Old 03-22-2009, 08:20 PM
  #99  
jfr0317
Rennlist Member
 
jfr0317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston & Austin
Posts: 883
Received 118 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lockmk
"While the manual is absolutely great in light to no traffic, especially on a winding road, I was hardly ever getting a chance to do that with my 07, and trust me, it is no fun driving a manual in Houston traffic.

With my new 09, the PDK not only takes away the tediousness of continually manually shifting in stop-and-go traffic, but it is fantastic for allowing me to quickly maneuver when an opening presents itself.

It would still be nice to have a manual transmission-equipped car to play with, but I am getting far more use from the 09 C2S PDK than I ever did with the 07 C2S and really now almost look forward to my daily 22 mile one-way commute."

This really puzzled me. If you rarely encounter light traffic or winding roads it seems your Porsche problem is not the transmission, it's where you live and how you use the car. I'm not sure I would be choosing a 911 primarily for commuting in heavy traffic...
I didn't choose it primarily for commuting in heavy traffic. I have another vehicle I use primarily for commuting. My point was that I can and do now use the 09 C2S to sometimes make the commute when I feel like it. I do use the Porsche in more proper elements such as the trip to the Texas Hill Country we just made this weekend.

As for my reasons for choosing a Porsche and choosing to sometimes drive it to work in Houston, I am near retirement (within two years, state of the economy notwithstanding), and we plan on moving to the Hill Country at that time. In the meantime, I am thoroughly enjoying my new car and plan to continue to do so, even if I sometimes have to drive it in traffic. Hope that is OK.
Old 04-18-2009, 01:44 PM
  #100  
useridchallenged
Instructor
 
useridchallenged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hillsborough, CA
Posts: 200
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Mini physics and math lesson...

Originally Posted by boolala
Of course we're talking about the change in momentum as the your forward momemtum is always positive unless you are in reverse gear.

My point is that within a fraction of a second you are restrained by the seatbelt and the change in momentum for both the vechicle and the occupant is rearwards.
Sorry about the geekery...

Momentum is proportional to the first derivative of position = Mass x Velocity

Force is proportional to the second deriviative of position = Mass x Acceleration

When you say "change in momentum", you are in fact talking about the first derivative of momentum, which is force.

So when you are slowing down, you are experiencing negative acceleration while you continue to move with forward momentum.

For even more geekery, I'll admit that when I was in college decades ago, I took an entire engineering class devoted to vehicle dynamics.
Old 04-18-2009, 01:58 PM
  #101  
OCBen
Banned
 
OCBen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Back in the OC
Posts: 15,022
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

^^ Excellent!
Old 04-18-2009, 06:00 PM
  #102  
boolala
Race Car
 
boolala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,019
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by useridchallenged
Sorry about the geekery...

Momentum is proportional to the first derivative of position = Mass x Velocity

Force is proportional to the second deriviative of position = Mass x Acceleration

When you say "change in momentum", you are in fact talking about the first derivative of momentum, which is force.

So when you are slowing down, you are experiencing negative acceleration while you continue to move with forward momentum.

For even more geekery, I'll admit that when I was in college decades ago, I took an entire engineering class devoted to vehicle dynamics.
Correct. No disagreement. As long as you are going forward (even though decelerating) your momentum is forwards (or positive as the convention may be). However, if you are decelerating the change in your momentum is pointing backwards. Thus it seems natural to me that that the paddle direction should be backwards for deceleration (lower gear). Conversely accelerating forwards (higher gear) has the momentum increasing in the forward direction and thus the natural paddle motion should be forwards.

I don't know why people are confused and think that the gear selector directions chosen by Porsche are wrong when , in fact, they simply don't understand the forces at play when changing speed. In fact the forward body motion when decelerating is not caused by any force in Newtonian mechanics. It is analogous to the Coriolis effect in rotating reference frames.
Old 04-18-2009, 07:11 PM
  #103  
Coochas
Rennlist Member
 
Coochas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 01776
Posts: 9,955
Received 426 Likes on 221 Posts
Default

Having recently driven a PDK on a C2S at Barber (3-day PSDS course), I feel that the shift levers are actually quite well designed and very natural to use at speed. I am also a person who thought the design looked bad before actually using it IRL. It could also be that I have not driven any other +/- automatic style cars with the exception of our Cayenne which is needless to say not a track car.
The easiest way to use the PDK in a braking zone is to simply pull pull pull pull and let the car find the lowest usable gear. I did not bother manually upshifting.
I guess my feeling is that regardless of whether or not you are experiencing accelerative or decelerative forces, I don't think the orientation of the +/- is important....they seem to work well the way they are.
Old 04-18-2009, 07:18 PM
  #104  
f4 plt
Rennlist Member

 
f4 plt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,128
Received 157 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coochas
Having recently driven a PDK on a C2S at Barber (3-day PSDS course), I feel that the shift levers are actually quite well designed and very natural to use at speed. I am also a person who thought the design looked bad before actually using it IRL. It could also be that I have not driven any other +/- automatic style cars with the exception of our Cayenne which is needless to say not a track car.
The easiest way to use the PDK in a braking zone is to simply pull pull pull pull and let the car find the lowest usable gear. I did not bother manually upshifting.
I guess my feeling is that regardless of whether or not you are experiencing accelerative or decelerative forces, I don't think the orientation of the +/- is important....they seem to work well the way they are.
I used a PDK car on the track also when I went through the Performance driving course last month (since my C2S is PDK) and I first let it do the shifting, I then tried the manual mode but found the best combination was to leave it in the auto mode but manually downshift when I wanted and if i got busy (easy to do) the transmission would accomplish the up shift when needed. If I had any doubts about the PDK using it on the track made me a believer. As with you i found the paddles to be very well placed. I have driven the Tip on my wife's Cayenne and several times on a Cayman S and the PDK is no Tip and the paddles or switches on the PDK are much better than the Tip. Back to the Masters course in September and a Summer of gaining track time in the SC to get ready. This old guy is hooked.
Old 04-18-2009, 10:44 PM
  #105  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

I wish all of you could have taken a ride with me at Sebring today. PDK is AWESOME....lightning quick shifts, perfect rev matches...made shifts like Patrick Lomg!!!!. The toggle levers on the steering wheel worked great.



Quick Reply: Anyone Regret Buying a PDK?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:44 AM.