Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PASm good idea on base 911 with 18" wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2009, 11:43 AM
  #16  
GreggT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GreggT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,842
Received 50 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by casaforte9
NYCA,
S gives ya 1) PASM 2) 40 HP more and 23 lb ft more torque 3) 19" wheels with bigger brakes and 4) some aluminium trim inside
And quad tips ..... want mine?
Old 01-21-2009, 12:02 PM
  #17  
RavenDog
Rennlist Member
 
RavenDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 28
Received 29 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

How about the option of order LSD alone with no PASM, and then adding an aftermarket coilover suspension. Would this setup perform better than Sport PASM/PASM?
Old 01-21-2009, 04:49 PM
  #18  
Minok
Drifting
 
Minok's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 2,415
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by casaforte9
NYCA,
S gives ya 1) PASM 2) 40 HP more and 23 lb ft more torque 3) 19" wheels with bigger brakes and 4) some aluminium trim inside
So the added $8k past the PASM gives you:
1) 3.8l motor
2) bigger brakes

It wasn't something that made sense for me, so I've got the base model, but for others, that may be a selling point.
Old 01-21-2009, 06:21 PM
  #19  
hellgelb
Advanced
 
hellgelb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'm fairly sure the S no longer has bigger brakes, and that the C2 / C4 brakes have been upsized to match the S models. Certainly read this in an '09 review. Somewhere...
Old 01-21-2009, 06:39 PM
  #20  
GreggT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GreggT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,842
Received 50 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

S has 13" rotors ..... non S 12.5
Old 01-21-2009, 07:36 PM
  #21  
Le Chef
Three Wheelin'
 
Le Chef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If you track that 1/2" is likely of value, if you're a cruiser then it's probably not worth it.
Old 01-22-2009, 12:20 AM
  #22  
RonCT
Moderator
Rennlist Member
 
RonCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,993
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I read as well in a magazine that the brakes on the C2 and C2S are now the same, but that's not what the Porsche brochure says and shows. There's a photo and the black brakes are very different looking... Maybe the rotors are the same sizes now?
Old 01-22-2009, 04:18 PM
  #23  
Minok
Drifting
 
Minok's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 2,415
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The brakes form the 2 to the 4 are a bit of a puzzle as there was lots of confusing and contradictory information out there before the 997.2 launch. I guess I should go measure mine to know what I have on my car.. not that it matters to me that much.

I recall seeing documentation indicating that all 997.2's would get upsized brakes, and the 3.8l would get bigger calipers or something... but then there was an issue for that being ROW and the North America market would not get larger brakes on the 997.2 3.6l cars. So in the end I don't know. I know the calipers are black.. which is groovy, and the 3.8l's get red calipers.. which I assume are probably beefed up (maybe more pistons).. though not sure if that means anything about the rotors.
Old 01-22-2009, 04:35 PM
  #24  
Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Fahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

I believe the rotors are the same diameter but they are thicker on the S?
Old 01-27-2009, 05:10 PM
  #25  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,900
Received 1,313 Likes on 610 Posts
Default

Press materials with re: to brakes are a mess.

In the C4/C4S book, the rotors on the S are indeed larger in diameter and in width.

As to the original question: previous experience with 987/997 cars suggested that 19s and no PASM were a very bad call, as the damper valving couldn't keep up with the spring rates once the heavier wheels were in place.

The setups that worked from 2005-2008 were:
-18s with standard suspension
-19s with PASM
-18s with PASM

I did get a response from a reader back then suggesting that the type of 19 mattered due to truly light 19s leveling the playing field, which sounds plausible to me. YMMV.

With the new cars, I just don't have the seat time in the various setups to make a solid suggestion. And if I don't...few will. Porsche is becoming very lean in its press fleet, which makes getting useful information for you, its customers, from reliable third-party sources and drivers (i.e. the press, or at least some of it) is not getting any easier. There was one article in a British pub on a loaded and non-loaded 997, and that's all I've seen. Porsche GB's press office made it possible via smart ordering for its press fleet.

It looks like the U.S. isn't getting a SPASM press car, which is a pity. I'll be working on them...

So, based on previous experience, I suspect 18s and PASM would offer the most compliant ride, and that PASM would work well with 18s, even though it is clearly optimized for 19s.

I wish I could be more helpful here...but hopefully this is at least a little helpful.

pete
Old 01-27-2009, 10:17 PM
  #26  
Cpa4S
Three Wheelin'
 
Cpa4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario - Ottawa area
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by casaforte9
NYCA,
S gives ya 1) PASM 2) 40 HP more and 23 lb ft more torque 3) 19" wheels with bigger brakes and 4) some aluminium trim inside
the brakes are no longer bigger on the S - they are just painted red rather then black.

you also get dual tail pipes if that is worth anything and alum gauges vs black; finally the inside stock trim bits are a different shade of alum/metal.
Old 01-27-2009, 11:35 PM
  #27  
RonCT
Moderator
Rennlist Member
 
RonCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,993
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cpa4S
the brakes are no longer bigger on the S - they are just painted red rather then black.
Not so - they are a totally different caliper design. Both are 4-piston, but the C2 is a closed-top design with "bulging" points where the pistons are, where C2S gets the same old "Big Red" type.
Old 01-28-2009, 12:14 AM
  #28  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

RonCt, I seem to keep hearing that the rotors are not the same thickness between the 2 either and the S brakes are superior still to the standard Carrera brakes. Also like you mentioned the calipers are totally different amkeing pad changes in the standard Carrera a pain.

I will take the S red brakes any day.
Old 01-28-2009, 09:24 AM
  #29  
casaforte9
Racer
Thread Starter
 
casaforte9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 490
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Excemag,
Thx for the analysis, I think u r accurate when u say PASM and 18" wheels will give the most compliant ride and probably 19s and PASM are optimal from a ride/handling perspective

I felt a targa C4s and PASm in Normal mode had the best ride over other 19s and PASM but cleraly S has that extra mid range that deifnetly can be felt though



Quick Reply: PASm good idea on base 911 with 18" wheels



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:49 PM.