April Road & Track Article
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
April Road & Track Article
Just received my April R&T and found an article comparing a Carrera S to a GT3RS. Makes me question the accuracy of R&T articles when they claim the deletion of spare tire in the RS contributes to its 80 lb. weight reduction, and they claim a 0-60 of 4.1 sec for Carrera S (vs 3.9 for RS).
#2
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Deletion of spare tire...too funny
They are spot on as far as the S being a more livable everyday drive
For others to read
THE ARTICLE
They are spot on as far as the S being a more livable everyday drive
For others to read
THE ARTICLE
#3
Wait, they did not quite say that, they said the deletion of the spare tire PLUS the deletion of the rear seats contributed to the 80 lb. weight reduction.
Actual quote:
"The GT3 RS is about 80 lb. lighter, thanks in part to deleting the rear seats and replacing the spare tire with a small electric air compressor and tire sealant."
Actual quote:
"The GT3 RS is about 80 lb. lighter, thanks in part to deleting the rear seats and replacing the spare tire with a small electric air compressor and tire sealant."
#4
Wait, they did not quite say that, they said the deletion of the spare tire PLUS the deletion of the rear seats contributed to the 80 lb. weight reduction.
Actual quote:
"The GT3 RS is about 80 lb. lighter, thanks in part to deleting the rear seats and replacing the spare tire with a small electric air compressor and tire sealant."
Actual quote:
"The GT3 RS is about 80 lb. lighter, thanks in part to deleting the rear seats and replacing the spare tire with a small electric air compressor and tire sealant."
That said, automotive journalists are far more accurate about facts than journalists in general. I've been quoted several times for articles in the local paper and trade magazines, and have found that journalists routinely butcher the facts, often to the point of getting the heart of the story wrong.
#5
Deletion of spare tire...too funny
They are spot on as far as the S being a more livable everyday drive
For others to read
THE ARTICLE
They are spot on as far as the S being a more livable everyday drive
For others to read
THE ARTICLE
#6
Instructor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just received my April R&T and found an article comparing a Carrera S to a GT3RS. Makes me question the accuracy of R&T articles when they claim the deletion of spare tire in the RS contributes to its 80 lb. weight reduction, and they claim a 0-60 of 4.1 sec for Carrera S (vs 3.9 for RS).
As for the 0-60 times, I'm not sure what the issue is. Those are not "claims" - they are the results of actual tests. In fact, R&T's last official roadtest of a 997 C2S resulted in a 3.9 second time (clearly that was one good running P-car - and sorely abused at the launch).
#7
Race Car
Maybe they are comparing it to the 996 GT3?
Some of the weight savings is due to the aluminum doors that the GT3 shares with the TT, because no way the rear seats weigh 80lbs. I mean, ****, the bottom cushions are only secured by velcro!
And for some reason, the aluminum makes the doors sound much nicer when slamming shut compared to my 997C2S. I'm sure it will trickle down to the rest of the 997 line.
Some of the weight savings is due to the aluminum doors that the GT3 shares with the TT, because no way the rear seats weigh 80lbs. I mean, ****, the bottom cushions are only secured by velcro!
And for some reason, the aluminum makes the doors sound much nicer when slamming shut compared to my 997C2S. I'm sure it will trickle down to the rest of the 997 line.