Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New 997 owner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2008, 03:01 PM
  #16  
Kevin K
Instructor
 
Kevin K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rockville, Maryland
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

To each their own - I think the 997 cab is the best looking convertible on the road with the top down. Top up, well a coupe is always going to look better.

Boxster, 90% as good? Extrapolating that just a bit, wouldn't that mean that a Cayman is basically 90%as "good" as a Carrera coupe for a helluva lot less money? "Good" is a tough term to define.
Old 01-27-2008, 11:31 AM
  #17  
Putt-Putt
Pro
 
Putt-Putt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 703
Received 251 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin K
..wouldn't that mean that a Cayman is basically 90%as "good" as a Carrera coupe for a helluva lot less money? "Good" is a tough term to define.
Good is easy to grok. It's good the Base Boxster weighs 2866 lbs. It's good that it's mid engine. It's good that it's better balanced than a 911. It's good that it costs almost thiry thousand dollars less than a base Carrera.

The base 911 is a better car, but only a little better for a 'helluva lot' more money.
Old 01-27-2008, 12:42 PM
  #18  
Kevin K
Instructor
 
Kevin K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rockville, Maryland
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm still not sure if you're suggesting then that a Cayman is 90% as good as a Carrera coupe. I'm not a car expert by any means, but I read that the Cayman is basically a coupe version of a Boxster.

What I do know is that the basic tenets of economics always apply. If a Cayman cost exactly the same as a Carrera, no one would ever buy the Cayman. If, as you suggest, the Cayman and the Boxster were really 90% as good as the Carrera coupe and Carrera cab respectively, but cost $30K+ less, then no one would buy the Carreras. Carreras seem to sell just fine, though.

So why do they? They do because there is something that makes your definition of "good" faulty. Maybe it's pedigree, prestige, the shape of the metal, whatever, but people value the Carerra far more than the "only 10% better" you suggest. You might be right on weight, horsepower, etc, you obviously know more about that than I do. But the Caymans and Boxsters can't be 90% as "good" and sell for 50% or so less.

So my point was that "good" is hard to define, because there is something going on that makes the Carreras a helluva lot more valuable. If you could really define "almost as good," you could be the guy setting prices for Porsche and optimizing their supply and demand curves. Sweet job, that would be.

In any case, I respect your opinion.

Kevin

Last edited by Kevin K; 01-27-2008 at 12:44 PM. Reason: typo
Old 01-27-2008, 03:57 PM
  #19  
Putt-Putt
Pro
 
Putt-Putt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 703
Received 251 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin K
I'm still not sure if you're suggesting then that a Cayman is 90% as good as a Carrera coupe. I'm not a car expert by any means, but I read that the Cayman is basically a coupe version of a Boxster.

What I do know is that the basic tenets of economics always apply. If a Cayman cost exactly the same as a Carrera, no one would ever buy the Cayman. If, as you suggest, the Cayman and the Boxster were really 90% as good as the Carrera coupe and Carrera cab respectively, but cost $30K+ less, then no one would buy the Carreras. Carreras seem to sell just fine, though.

So why do they? They do because there is something that makes your definition of "good" faulty. Maybe it's pedigree, prestige, the shape of the metal, whatever, but people value the Carerra far more than the "only 10% better" you suggest. You might be right on weight, horsepower, etc, you obviously know more about that than I do. But the Caymans and Boxsters can't be 90% as "good" and sell for 50% or so less.

So my point was that "good" is hard to define, because there is something going on that makes the Carreras a helluva lot more valuable. If you could really define "almost as good," you could be the guy setting prices for Porsche and optimizing their supply and demand curves. Sweet job, that would be.

In any case, I respect your opinion.

Kevin
Carrera's have great brand appeal, and sell. But put a C2S engine on the Cayman platform and it will eat into Carrera sales. 90% as good? Yes, better, some would say, since it's mid engine.
Old 01-27-2008, 09:07 PM
  #20  
WAC
Instructor
 
WAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The Cayman is a totally different car built for different purposes than the 911. It is an awesome car with great looks and terrific handling. With the S motor it's got plenty of power but I'd love to drive a RUF conversion or something similar. If you could live without the back seats that'd be a a helluva ride for the money.
Old 01-28-2008, 10:31 PM
  #21  
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Edgy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 17,699
Received 235 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WAC
The Cayman is a totally different car built for different purposes than the 911. It is an awesome car with great looks and terrific handling. With the S motor it's got plenty of power but I'd love to drive a RUF conversion or something similar. If you could live without the back seats that'd be a a helluva ride for the money.
A neighbor of mine had Alois Ruf supercharge his Cayman S. 400ps. Have not driven it yet but he is always smiling!
Attached Images  



Quick Reply: New 997 owner



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:58 AM.